@
alaungphaya @
the just @
Mockingjay
Well. Let's talk about the fact you have provide as #1, #2 and #3. You said there was no where in the history of Bengal you ever had any ethnic groups call rohingya. There was non in Myanmar as well. I would here provide logic. Please think really carefully on the following.
In History, which is the fact, After Sultan Jalaluddin Muhammad Shah's death in 1433, Narameikhla's successors repaid Bengal by occupying Ramu in 1437 and Chittagong in 1459. Arakan would hold Chittagong until 1666.
It had been over 200 years that Rakhine (
Kingdom of Mrauk U) ruled over Chittagong. During those long years, people (let says here Bengali ethnic, Rohingya ethnic, Rahkine enthnic and Maramagyi ethnic) moved and migrated back and forth between arakan regions and Chittagong. Because of those migration, you can see Rakhine ethnic and Marama gyi ethnic in BD. Also we see Bangali ethnic in all over Myanmar.
But why not Rohingya ethnic in your BD? Isn't it strange? If Rohingya ethnic did exist in history, BD would see this ethnic group in ethnic list in BD and they should be somewhere in your history.
But unfortunately, no where in BD history and not included in the ethnic of BD. No Where in the history of Myanmar as well. WHY? WHY? WHY? 3 big whys.
The fact is that they Rohingya has created themselves as Rohingya ethnic and it were a part of MYANMAR. Educated people from their side went through a lot of history books and fortunately, they found just one word from a record and they gave birth to Rohingya and they adopted it. Since then, They have been sitting on that lie. Their ambition is to claim to the land in where they would have a chance to rule by their own government. This is why Rakhine ethnic reject this lie and they want to kick out of their land.
It is the fact.