Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow what a scheme, first kill the innocent people and then call it a collateral damage. Perfect.Looks like the good commetary have no clue about International Law.
The French call the dead "Collateral Damage".
She interprets this as a mistake, which shows her lack of knowledge.
That is because of Your racist belief that killing Muslims is a worse crime than killing a non Muslim.
Also You obviously believe that if a non Muslim kills one Muslim, it is a worse crime than
if a Muslim kills thousand Muslims.
You also expect non Muslims to share Your views.
Pakistan as a Nation has signed the Geneva Conventions which defines the Laws for Warfare.
The difference between France and Muslim Terrorists is that they consider themselves bound
by International Law, and Muslim Terrorists do their utmost to break every law on Warfare.
There is nothing in the article that indicates any crimes have been committed.
Your support for International Crimes makes a you a traitor to Pakistan.
It's coming from a rabidly anti-Muslim hatemonger. He loves to twist the words of the people he hates. Hatred is what keeps these maggots running. Show where he claimed that if non-Muslims kill Muslims it's a worse crime? Matter of fact, it's the other way round. When non-Muslims in Myanmar indiscriminately massacre Muslims it is not a big problem but if one non-Muslim is murdered in a Muslim state like Pakistan all western nations immediately send their emissaries to investigate.
Wow what a scheme, first kill the innocent people and then call it a collateral damage. Perfect.
The only difference between France and her created ISIS is the former calls it a collateral damage.
It is shown by the Focus on 120 Muslims killed by what is claimed by France to be a Military Target,
and the Non Focus on the 200,000 Muslims killed by other Muslims in Syria.
Each country has a responsibility towards its own citizens.
Why should any country have a responsibility to investigate murders on non-citizens
in a remote part of the world?
NGO like Amnesty does that even if they have no responsibility, so the conflict in Myanmar is still known here.
The "innocent" people should not have stayed close to a Military Target,
or rather, a Military Target should not have been located close to civilian areas.
Cowardly ISIS terrorists rarely dare to attack anything but pure civilian targets,
Racists don't see the difference.
The word 'racist' was coined to describe your type so refrain from using the word if you have any shame. As for investigating non-citizens, your hypocrisy in this case is applied to the Rohingas in Burma but when it comes to those non-citizen Hindus or Christians murdered in Muslim states like Pakistan or BD you forget this. Enough of your hypocritical crap, now take a hike.
I am not aware that the Swedish Government is investigating murders of non-citizens in any of Pakistan, BD or Burma, so You are barking up the wrong tree.
Press is covering the plight of the Rohingas in Burma much more than that of Hindus or Christians
in Pakistan or BD, so You are displaying the typical Muslim victim role, even when others are worse off.
You group together all of the west and make everyone there responsible for what some may or may not be doing.The Swedish Government is not exactly the leader of the west. I was talking about the gang leaders. Either you are ignorant of what they have been doing in Pakistan and BD or you are just pretending. The US administration's top dogs don't waste time to personally come down to see the progress of the investigations. Anyway, talking to born racists is waste of time.
What exactly do you mean by MUslims terrorists ?Muslim Terrorists
How different is that As you labelled terrorists as muslims. As if you are trying to imply that Islam supports and promotes terrorism ?You group together all of the west and make everyone there responsible for what some may or may not be doing.
That is definitely racism.
What exactly do you mean by MUslims terrorists ?
I sense hatred and biased here
@Oscar could you please define Muslim terrorist for me
How different is that As you labelled terrorists as muslims. As if you are trying to imply that Islam supports and promotes terrorism ?
Because of the hatred you have. Just because you consider them MUSLIMS doesn't mean they are.I consider it to be Muslim Terrorism.
Why would a mercenary or a terrorist follow anything for that matter ?But those groups are not trying to follow International Law at all.
Because of the hatred you have. Just because you consider them MUSLIMS doesn't mean they are.
How much of Islam are you aware of ? DO you even know the mainstream Muslims and the clerics reject them as such, So who do you think you are to label them as such? Unless, of course you have biased like most of you lot do, due to sheer lack of knowledge and distorted information
Why would a mercenary or a terrorist follow anything for that matter ?
Hes a bloody terrorist, A psychotic killer, supported and funded by powers who have interests in keeping them alive, to keep the population in total fear so that MIC keep on running
Where does Quran states kill innocent people ?They seek arguments for their actions in the Qur'an.
Where does Quran states kill innocent people ?
State that !
Nope they seek people from war ravage countries like Iraq, Its not hard to find such psychotic killers when coalition forces collaterally kill their family, You can find easy recruit. When NAto Invaded Iraq under false pretext of WMD people will lose their civility and have hardcore militant minded mentality
Funding from muslim societies ? Please prove it. Otherwise its just your typical rant. In fact EU support and ufnds illegal jewish settlements.
Enough for you ! is because based on limited information and total hatred this is what you want to believe.
Before jumping into illogical conclusion care to read about Islam first. You cannot judge anything with limited information