MastanKhan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 21,269
- Reaction score
- 166
- Country
- Location
Actually---the only one of them who had any bit of character, a backbone and had a vision was Gen Musharraf. He did have his shortcomings---. His shortcoming was---
1. he had a very weak prime minister in the name of Nawaz Sharif---a pathetic and a gutless man---
2. he got the coalition of an equally disgusting Ch Shujaat
3. he was very weak when it came to providing justice.
If I have a choice to bring them back with a slight modification in their modus operandi---it would be Gen Musharraf.
Regardless of what I have said about this man---you cannot take one thing away from him----at every oppurtunity he gets----and at every oppurtunity he can creates----he comes out swinging for the defence of pakistan---there has been no a single critique who has gained an upper hand on Gen Musharraf.
Gen Kiyani is litetrally a 'coward'---whereas Musharraf always had pakistan as number 1-----Kiyani put his friendship top Mullen as number 1---.
Tomorrow we may open up nato routes and pak millitary start getting its stuff from u s---but the image of pakistan that has been smashed in front of the american public by Kiyani for not speaking up and fighting the media war---it is as close to being treasonous as it can get.
All of these generals had their moments of greatness---that would have literally put them in glowing tributes in the history books.
For Ayub---if he had not switched generals and given the opponents 48-72 hours reprive---Kiyani for acting during salala strike and then later speaking up for pakistan.
Sir,
A discussion without emotion is worthless---the execution needs to be ice cold---but unless there is no head butting---explosions---collisions---yellings and screamings in a discussion---it means that either the participants are not serious---nobody wants to give an honest opinion---participants are afraid to speak up---or they have no vision and are clueless.
1. he had a very weak prime minister in the name of Nawaz Sharif---a pathetic and a gutless man---
2. he got the coalition of an equally disgusting Ch Shujaat
3. he was very weak when it came to providing justice.
If I have a choice to bring them back with a slight modification in their modus operandi---it would be Gen Musharraf.
Regardless of what I have said about this man---you cannot take one thing away from him----at every oppurtunity he gets----and at every oppurtunity he can creates----he comes out swinging for the defence of pakistan---there has been no a single critique who has gained an upper hand on Gen Musharraf.
Gen Kiyani is litetrally a 'coward'---whereas Musharraf always had pakistan as number 1-----Kiyani put his friendship top Mullen as number 1---.
Tomorrow we may open up nato routes and pak millitary start getting its stuff from u s---but the image of pakistan that has been smashed in front of the american public by Kiyani for not speaking up and fighting the media war---it is as close to being treasonous as it can get.
All of these generals had their moments of greatness---that would have literally put them in glowing tributes in the history books.
For Ayub---if he had not switched generals and given the opponents 48-72 hours reprive---Kiyani for acting during salala strike and then later speaking up for pakistan.
i'm curious as to what metrics and parameters you guys are using to determine the best from the bestest....
this thread is emotional, in nature.......so therefore, quite useless!
Sir,
A discussion without emotion is worthless---the execution needs to be ice cold---but unless there is no head butting---explosions---collisions---yellings and screamings in a discussion---it means that either the participants are not serious---nobody wants to give an honest opinion---participants are afraid to speak up---or they have no vision and are clueless.