Gee, I don't know...
Well, gee you should since you're living in Germany.
Maybe because the 'Stalinist experience' which the peoples of the Soviet-Union endured is absent among the Germans? And that no one is propagating Stalinism in Germany?
So you're justifying the acceptance of one ideology of mass murder while criticizing the other? Wow, you're so not a hypocrite.
And the fact that present day 'communist' parties in Western countries never advocate the policies of mass starvation and mass execution that were employed by Stalin?
Not only Stalin, but all countries that came under the rule of that ideology of mass murder witnessed mass starvation, executions, labor camps, etc. Examples are China's cultural revolution, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, and brutal crushing of uprisings in Eastern Europe.
And secondly, how do you know if a Communist party would or would not apply similar if not more extreme policies as their predecessors did? I too can say "perhaps if a National Socialist party would be legalized and accepted, perhaps maybe this or that, blah blah blah, etc"???
Or the fact that almost no one is denying the mass murders that occurred at the hands of Stalin and his henchmen?
And who's denying the holohoax in Germany? Almost everyone in Germany is a devout holohoax believer, they take their daily dose of holohoax propaganda from schools and tv's.
So basically, just because no one is denying the mass murders committed under Stalin, Lenin, and other commie's therefore it is alright to allow this party in German politics. Wow, what a absurd logic.... So you're accepting that they and their ideology is responsible for the mass murder of millions in order to justify the acceptance of this ideology in Germany?
BTW, i find it strange how there are red army soldier monuments in Berlin, what a way to glorify the murderers and rapists of 2 million German women. A lot like stockholm syndrome.
Or the fact, among others, that by participating in a fair and free elections by present day 'communist' parties is in itself not communist at all as envisioned by Marxist himself, who was more thinking thinking in the line of a revolution by laborers?
But its still a ideology no different from Nazism (if we are to tag along with your thinking), according to what you said.
So you're justifying the existence of a communist party
Or the fact that Nazism is inherently linked with racism and and a extermination policy against specific groups and peoples
And communism is linked with flower girls and birthday parties?
(as witnessed and experienced by many Europeans), whereas Marxism in theory was intended to distribute the wealth equally among all and the strive for a classless society
Yeah, i'm sure those 60 million people murdered in cold blood got their distribution of wealth.
, and that perverted ideologies like Stalinism, Leninism or Maoism, that were derived from Marxism/Communism, have never taken root in and experienced by those countries that want to curb Nazism like Germany and Austria?
Marx was a German Jew, Engels was German and regardless of the different leaders it was the same ideology only different faces. Its like saying
"Oh, "Osamaism" is a tolerant ideology but "al-qaedaism" is extremist and new".
Seriously, is holohoax and self hatred all they teach you people in schools??
So, taken all this into account, why would it make sense to ban social democrats or socialists that are not against the fundamental achievements of a democratic, egalitarian and forbearing constitutional state?
Then going by what you said above Hitler was a democratically elected leader (which he was, but this is probably news to you since you were taught to believe otherwise).
Just a few thoughts why your comparison is so wrong and invalid....
How so? Are we not discussing mass murdering ideologies? One which you disregard but the other you justify?
Don't see the contradiction at all.
Actually, you'd don't see a lot of things, unfortunately.