Barak: Israel may Invade Syria, Seize Advanced Weapons

[Hasbara Buster]

go arm the Palestinian resistance, since 1948 saudi ''arabia'' have done nothing, but talk and talk, no actions nothing, Gaza 2008 did any Arab nation act but Syria? and even blackeagle admitted it, so stop the BS of saying ending the bloodshed, you are no one to speak about that,

and Syria have hosted many dialogues which you the "Arabs" and the west didn't encourage, look at Russia and even Iran now is supporting peace by hosting Dialogues, but Saudi never spoke of dialogue but instead adding oil to the fire and send weapons and terrorism.

and go help the muslims in Burma, they are dying, 20k died in one week.

Exactly my thoughts. Syria and evil shias Hizbullah and Iran have helped Palestinians and Lebanese more than Saudi Arabia and all other Muslim countries combined.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

When the "Arabs" meet with the NATO leaders, what does that mean to you? just drinking coffee ? dude you guys even posted Articles of Saudi Arabia sending forces to Jordan so they will be sent to Syria. and we saw the no fly zone in Libya where Qatar took a big role in killing 50k Libyans.

and dont forget the ''arabs'' support chapter 7 on Syria, what does that mean?

Chapter 7 means air-force intervention like what happened in Libya.
Man, your army fought Iraq side by side with Nato in 1991. You regime sent armors and scud missles to Iran to shell Iraqi cities in GW1. Your regime agreed to get NATO intervention in Lybia through Arab league. Why are you forgeting all of that? Regarding Lybia:
Estimated total casualties on both sides, including civilians:
25,000[35]–30,000 killed, 4,000 missing,[36]
50,000 injured[37]
Libyan civil war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Check the sources in this link.

go arm the Palestinian resistance, since 1948 saudi ''arabia'' have done nothing, but talk and talk, no actions nothing, Gaza 2008 did any Arab nation act but Syria? and even blackeagle admitted it, so stop the BS of saying ending the bloodshed, you are no one to speak about that,

and Syria have hosted many dialogues which you the "Arabs" and the west didn't encourage, look at Russia and even Iran now is supporting peace by hosting Dialogues, but Saudi never spoke of dialogue but instead adding oil to the fire and send weapons and terrorism.


and go help the muslims in Burma, they are dying, 20k died in one week.

Category:Wars involving Saudi Arabia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Syrian Lion]

Chapter 7 means air-force intervention like what happened in Libya.
Man, your army fought Iraq side by side with Nato in 1991. You regime sent armors and scud missles to Iran to shell Iraqi army in GW1. Your regime agreed to get NATO intervention in Lybia through Arab league. Why are you forgeting all of that? Regarding Lybia:
Estimated total casualties on both sides, including civilians:
25,000[35]–30,000 killed, 4,000 missing,[36]
50,000 injured[37]
Libyan civil war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Check the sources in this link.


Category:Wars involving Saudi Arabia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mr, BS, first of all Syria did the right thing in the 91 war, Iraq had no right to take Kuwait, we defended our brothers in Kuwait, and Syria didn't vote in the AL to attack Libya, what are you talking about?? In the source you provided Syria is not even included in the war, stop making stuff up and say Syria voted to destroy Libya, give me a source that says Syria voted yes to destroy Libya, we are not western puppets like GCC and Jordan to vote and ask nato to destroy Libya.

And saudi Arabia didn't do anything the six day war, they just gave Pakistani pilots airplanes, so basically it was Pakistan. and we didn't see Saudi arabia do anything in Gaza 2008 or Lebanon 2006

and chapter 7 allows military intervention, chapter 7 means war.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

Mr, BS, first of all Syria did the right thing in the 91 war, Iraq had no right to take Kuwait, we defended our brothers in Kuwait, and Syria didn't vote in the AL to attack Libya, what are you talking about?? In the source you provided Syria is not even included in the war, stop making stuff up and say Syria voted to destroy Libya, give me a source that says Syria voted yes to destroy Libya, we are not western puppets like GCC and Jordan to vote and ask nato to destroy Libya.

And saudi Arabia didn't do anything the six day war, they just gave Pakistani pilots airplanes, so basically it was Pakistan. and we didn't see Saudi arabia do anything in Gaza 2008 or Lebanon 2006

Yeh, the 16 pilots?
Syria voted for it. Anyway, what I meant by saying Syria fought with Nato in 1991 war, is that not every time Nato can be on the wrong side. Lybia was destroyed by Qaddafi and his African mercenaries. Nato helped Libyans by raiding selected military targets.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Yeh, the 16 pilots?
Syria voted for it. Anyway, what I meant by saying Syria fought with Nato in 1991 war, is that not every time Nato can be on the wrong side. Lybia was destroyed by Qaddafi and his African mercenaries. Nato helped Libyans by raiding selected military targets.

give me a source that shows Syria voted to destroy Libya? and NATO wasn't involved in the 91 war, yes there were countries who were in NATO, but NATO wasn't involved at all. and we didn't go to 91 war for the west, we went to help out brothers in Kuwait, we don't care who was in it. anyway now give me the prove that Syria approved NATO destruction of Libya and destroying the country and making Libya a place for the west, where 35% of oil goes to france for free.

 

[Serpentine]

Man, your army fought Iraq side by side with Nato in 1991. You regime sent armors and scud missles to Iran to shell Iraqi cities in GW1.

What's the problem with that?Syria did help Iran. Because Iraq was the aggressor.
So according to your logic,invasion of Iran by Iraq was a good thing,but invasion of Kuwait was a bad thing?Again,hypocrisy.
Kuwait also paid the price for its actions against Iran.It supported Iraq,gave them huge amounts of money,and at the end,Iraq was bankrupt and couldn't pay back,so they asked Kuwait to forgive that money to Iraq,Kuwait refused and Iraq attacked it.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

give me a source that shows Syria voted to destroy Libya? and NATO wasn't involved in the 91 war, yes there were countries who were in NATO, but NATO wasn't involved at all. and we didn't go to 91 war for the west, we went to help out brothers in Kuwait, we don't care who was in it. anyway now give me the prove that Syria approved NATO destruction of Libya and destroying the country and making Libya a place for the west, where 35% of oil goes to france for free.

What is this BS? ****!! From where do you get this crap... This is over. Man, Nato only and only raided Qaddafi's troops who is the one who destroyed Libya. There are videos show that Qaddafi and his sons threatening of destroying Libyan oil infrastructures as a punishment. And they tried to do that and destroyed parts of them.

 

[Syrian Lion]

What is this BS? ****!! From where do you get this crap... This is over. Man, Nato only and only raided Qaddafi's troops who is the one who destroyed Libya. There are videos show that Qaddafi and his sons threatening of destroying Libyan oil infrastructures as a punishment. And they tried to do that and destroyed parts of them.

Show me the approval of Syria saying NATO may destroy Libya, and wth Libyans troops are Libyans, and NATO now caused civil war in Libya, so its all NATO fault, every death in Libya after Qadaffi is NATO and the "Arabs" who approved NATO intervention fault.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

What's the problem with that?Syria did help Iran. Because Iraq was the aggressor.
So according to your logic,invasion of Iran by Iraq was a good thing,but invasion of Kuwait was a bad thing?Again,hypocrisy.
Kuwait also paid the price for its actions against Iran.It supported Iraq,gave them huge amounts of money,and at the end,Iraq was bankrupt and couldn't pay back,so they asked Kuwait to forgive that money to Iraq,Kuwait refused and Iraq attacked it.

I am not saying it's a good thing or a bad thing. It was to prove my point about sth. However, Saying who started the war would derail the thread. May another time in another thread.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

Show me the approval of Syria saying NATO may destroy Libya, and wth Libyans troops are Libyans, and NATO now caused civil war in Libya, so its all NATO fault, every death in Libya after Qadaffi is NATO and the "Arabs" who approved NATO intervention fault.

Syria was part of Arab league they voted in favor of it man! What's wrong with you? It wouldn't have been issued if one Arab countey didn't vote in it's favor.

 

[Hasbara Buster]

You regime sent armors and scud missles to Iran to shell Iraqi cities in GW1.

You should be happy they did, because it was not Iran that attacked Iraq. Saddam was not only evil, but also an unbelievable idiot. The Americans told him that Iran was about to attack Iraq any moment (pure fabrication). That idiot believed the Americans and attacked Iran first.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Syria was part of Arab league they voted in favor of it man! What's wrong with you? It wouldn't have been issued if one Arab countey didn't vote in it's favor.

three countries didn't agree to sanction Syria, but the AL still did it, so stop saying Syria agreed to it, you making stuff up, SYRIA NEVER AGREED TO SUCH ATTACK ON AN ARAB COUNTRY, WE ARE NOT JORDAN. YOU TRAITOR. AGAIN BRING ME THE PROVE.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

You should be happy they did, because it was not Iran that attacked Iraq. Saddam was not only evil, but also an unbelievable idiot. The Americans told him that Iran was about to attack Iraq any moment (pure fabrication). That idiot believed the Americans and attacked Iran first.

Oh my God...That's hilarious man. Anyway, I don't have any desire to derail the thread into Iraq-Iran war.

 

[Hasbara Buster]

Oh my God...That's hilarious man. Anyway, I don't have any desire to derail the thread into Iraq-Iran war.

It's hilarious isn't it. Ask Husnu (Hosni) Mahalli, a Syrian top expert on Middle East affairs who was in both Iran and Iraq during the war. It's his field of expertise, but of course you know better.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

three countries didn't agree to sanction Syria, but the AL still did it, so stop saying Syria agreed to it, you making stuff up, SYRIA NEVER AGREED TO SUCH ATTACK ON AN ARAB COUNTRY, WE ARE NOT JORDAN. YOU TRAITOR. AGAIN BRING ME THE PROVE.

Let me say that you are rude and don't deserve to be taken seriously. All Arab countries voted in it's favor except Algeria which abstained. All you are doing here is lying.

It's hilarious isn't it. Ask Husnu (Hosni) Mahalli, a Syrian top expert on Middle East affairs who was in both Iran and Iraq during the war. It's his field of expertise, but of course you know better.

I have read many books about this war and watched many interviews with former Iraqi, soviet, Western, and Arab officers/high rank diplomats, as well as documentaries. And I have never heard sth like that.