What's new

Bangladesh's per capita income rises to $2,227

nationalists of both countries won't see it this way, but this is fact. Doesn't matter if BD is 2% more or less than India. It's not a competition. reality is both countries suck.
True but what matters is which sucks more. If one poops on the beach and rape people and kill people for eating beef, it definitely sucks much more than the one with one party power struggle
 
.
. .
Only uttar pradesh and bihar are dumping bodies in rivers.
Rest of India which has 1 billion population alone are not.

Many states are dumping bodies, it's just more noticeable in densely populated states like UP (828 persons/km²) .
 
.
Many states are dumping bodies, it's just more noticeable in densely populated states like UP (828 persons/km²) .
Fake.
Not a single state other than UP and Bihar.
National lockdown is not imposed by Modi, but local governments (provincial level) do impose lockdown where 80 percent of them are doing it now.
Not really.
Almost all industries in the Industrial states are open.
For example during national lockdown in April 2020 not a single car was sold by dealers, but now during a states lockdown total nation wide car sales in May 2021 will cross 150,000!
 
.
You can Thank one man's incompetence, his destructive/divisive philosophies and ill-considered economic actions in India for this.

The irony is, we did not have to do anything special, we simply avoided the big eff-ups that happened in India.


I am surprised just how much Modi has managed to mess up the Indian economy as he did really well in Gujarat when he was CM.

Looking a bit more deeply, it is probably accurate to say that the boom in the Indian economy during the Singh-era was probably not sustainable and whoever replaced Singh as PM would have presided over slightly lower economic growth anyway.
 
.
Being a BAL chamcha living in Dhaka you are again falsifying with that 1971. Much of our infrastructure was built long before 1971 and the country was quite industrialized.

-Think of the thousands of km of Zilla roads across the nation including bridges and culverts. Were these built by your Hasina Bibi after 1971 or were built before 1971?

- Urea Fertilizer factories, TSP Fertilizer Factory, Chittagong Cables, Chittagong Steel Mills, Chandraghona paper Mills, Dry Dock at Patenga, Kaptai Dam, All the Jute Mills, a few cement factories, Tongi industrial zone, Motijheel C/A, Dilkusha C/A, Dhanmondi R/A, GK Project, and many hundred others were built before your Hasina Bibi came to power in 1971.

- Do you think the railway system in Bd was done by your Hasina Bibi? It was done during the British time in around 1920s. BAL people came to power and destroyed 200 km stretch. Now, the total track line is only 2,800 km. So, learn from history that was created long before your BAL/Hasina came to power in 1971.

- Most were done through govt money. When your BAL came to power after 1971, Chamchas like you destroyed almost all the industries including the Jute Mills.

-Your Hasina Bibi is just continuously building 100 Export Processing Zones for the last twenty years. But, no one is coming to invest.

Do not ever falsify history. It is not your storybook, you shameless idiot!! I will keep on watching over your falsification of everything. You belong to BBS, live in Dhaka but come here with two English flags. Liers must be dealt with properly.


I am going to ignore your ranting and focus on key metrics:


1. BD 1971


Literacy: 18%

Life Expectancy: 47 years



2. China 1978

Literacy: 78%

Life Expectancy: 66 years.


By 1978, China already had a lot of heavy industries and was able to build its own trains/ships/planes and had a nearly full nuclear arsenal that included ICBMs capable of hitting the European part of the former Soviet Union. Mao had laid the groundwork over the last 30 years with his single minded and at times ruthless policies(Great Leap Forward).

All it needed was a leader like Deng Xioping to come into power and allow capitalism to flourish, and with the financial expertise of Hong Kong and advanced manufacturing industries of Taiwan thrown in, it boomed with 10% growth per annum average from 1980-2020.

You need to take a step-back and see that China and BD were in totally different positions when BD gained independence in 1971 and China opened itself up to the West in 1978.
 
Last edited:
.
I am surprised just how much Modi has managed to mess up the Indian economy as he did really well in Gujarat when he was CM.

Looking a bit more deeply, it is probably accurate to say that the boom in the Indian economy during the Singh-era was probably not sustainable and whoever replaced Singh as PM would have presided over slightly lower economic growth anyway.

Right wing, populist rulers often seem like good administrators and do become super electable - but usually end up ruining a country for generations to come.

The same happened in Pakistan with Zia ul Haq, Erdogan's Turkey, which is in massive trouble, and Brazil under Bolsenaro.
 
.
I am going to ignore your ranting and focus on key metrics:


1. BD 1971


Literacy: 18%

Life Expectancy: 47 years



2. China 1978

Literacy: 78%

Life Expectancy: 66 years.


By 1978, China already had a lot of heavy industries and was able to build its own trains/ships/planes and had a nearly full nuclear arsenal that included ICBMs capable of hitting the European part of the former Soviet Union. Mao had laid the groundwork over the last 30 years with his single minded and at times ruthless policies(Great Leap Forward).

All it needed was a leader like Deng Xioping to come into power and allow capitalism to flourish, and with the financial expertise of Hong Kong and advanced manufacturing industries of Taiwan thrown in, it boomed with 10% growth per annum average from 1980-2020.

You need to take a step-back and see that China and BD were in totally different positions when BD gained independence in 1971 and China opened itself up to the West in 1978.
Shut your ignorant and big mouth up. I have already started ignoring you because you are unable either to teach others or learn from others. Most ignominious guy/girl in this Forum.

You will remain stupid throughout your life spewing false information and learning nothing.
 
.
Fake.
Not a single state other than UP and Bihar.

Not really.
Almost all industries in the Industrial states are open.
For example during national lockdown in April 2020 not a single car was sold by dealers, but now during a states lockdown total nation wide car sales in May 2021 will cross 150,000!

If you have to compare India to Bangladesh that’s when you know India has fucked up.

India should be trying to beat Chinese statistics on development ..... oh wait they can’t
 
.
Shut your ignorant and big mouth up. I have already started ignoring you because you are unable either to teach others or learn from others. Most ignominious guy/girl in this Forum.

You will remain stupid throughout your life spewing false information and learning nothing.


Hey I was about to ignore you as well and so it is all good between us now. :D
 
.
I am going to ignore your ranting and focus on key metrics:


1. BD 1971


Literacy: 18%

Life Expectancy: 47 years



2. China 1978

Literacy: 78%

Life Expectancy: 66 years.


By 1978, China already had a lot of heavy industries and was able to build its own trains/ships/planes and had a nearly full nuclear arsenal that included ICBMs capable of hitting the European part of the former Soviet Union. Mao had laid the groundwork over the last 30 years with his single minded and at times ruthless policies(Great Leap Forward).

All it needed was a leader like Deng Xioping to come into power and allow capitalism to flourish, and with the financial expertise of Hong Kong and advanced manufacturing industries of Taiwan thrown in, it boomed with 10% growth per annum average from 1980-2020.

You need to take a step-back and see that China and BD were in totally different positions when BD gained independence in 1971 and China opened itself up to the West in 1978.

Well buddy we don’t have time for silly corruption or games , we either industrialize or DIE.

Bangladesh has only 1 chance , hopefully it doesn’t mess it up
 
.
I am surprised just how much Modi has managed to mess up the Indian economy as he did really well in Gujarat when he was CM.

Looking a bit more deeply, it is probably accurate to say that the boom in the Indian economy during the Singh-era was probably not sustainable and whoever replaced Singh as PM would have presided over slightly lower economic growth anyway.

Well I would not bring Singh into this, Manmohan Singh was a superbly talented economist.

And this nincompoop under discussion is only good at fascist propaganda, nothing else. He cannot rise above that level of mediocrity. Chhagal dia langol chash hoina. Can't use a goat to till land.

Rather than me explain this, let's look at what Nikkei (a Japanese media outlet) published last year, by a highly-placed Indian fiscal expert himself.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Narendra Modi has left India's economy a shattered mess

Instead of bold reforms, PM has relied on cash handouts and divisive culture wars

Ritesh Kumar Singh

August 31, 2020 17:00 JST
https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F5%252F8%252F2%252F1%252F29011285-3-eng-GB%252FCropped-1598369309G20200825%2520Narendra%2520Modi.jpg

Modi relies too heavily on a select group of bureaucrats to implement his vision. © Hindustan Times/Getty Images

Ritesh Kumar Singh is chief economist of Indonomics Consulting and a former assistant director of the Finance Commission of India.

Despite his pro-business image, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is proving increasingly inept at managing India's economy, with his dream of building a $5 trillion behemoth by 2025 now looking increasingly unachievable.

A native Gujarati, one of India's most advanced industrial states, Modi has consistently raised hopes that he'd fix the economy and create enough jobs for the 12 million youths who join the country's workforce each year.

Yet six years after riding a wave of optimism into office, India's economy is a shattered mess, with gross domestic product contracting by a whopping 23.9% in the April-June quarter for the first time in four decades and unemployment at an all-time high. None of the major growth engines -- consumption, private investment, or exports -- are firing. Worse, the government doesn't have the capacity to try and spend its way out of the downturn.

Managing the economy hasn't been Modi's only fumble. After promising to rein in corruption, Modi approved a disastrous banknote demonetization scheme aimed at eradicating the black market economy and clamping down on tax evasion. In addition to the chaos it created, the scheme ruined the prospects of hundreds of thousands of farmers and small to medium enterprise owners, the two sectors which relied most on cash transactions. While supporters insist the adverse impact of the note ban was short-term, the supposed long-term gains in the fight against corruption remain a pipe dream.

Then came the introduction of a nationwide goods and services tax, which, weakened by inconsistent rates and a plethora of exemptions, hasn't been the game changer voters were promised. Instead of creating a seamless market of 1.3 billion people that businesses could tap to grow faster, it's been a compliance nightmare. In other words, Modi's attempts to use the note ban and the GST to help clean up the Indian economy have actually dampened India's growth prospects.

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F_aliases%252Farticleimage%252F5%252F6%252F4%252F1%252F29011465-3-eng-GB%252FCropped-1598369435R20200825%2520note%2520ban%2520Kolkata.JPG
People queue to deposit 500 and 1,000 Indian rupee banknotes inside a branch of Indian Bank in Kolkata in November 2016: Modi's attempts to use the note ban to help clean up the economy have dampened growth prospects. © Reuters

Another unfulfilled commitment was the promise to end the "tax terror" unleashed by the former Congress-led government. Instead, by empowering tax officials with draconian powers, Modi has added to India's tax uncertainties, further deterring existing and prospective investors. And if that was not enough, creeping trade protectionism is making it difficult for businesses to manage their supply chains efficiently. Not only does that sustain inefficient industries and discourage exports, it's a repeat of a lesson India already learned during the four decades of the license raj that saw GDP growth rates capped around 4%, and which was eventually dismantled in 1991.

Astonishingly, the Modi government has embraced this failed policy, raising import duties on over 3600 goods, with more and more products being placed on the restricted import list in order to indulge a few business cronies at the expense of consumers. Despite winning comfortable parliamentary majorities, Modi has squandered the opportunity to push through tougher labor and land reforms, instead doling out cash handouts to win short term popularity. No wonder private capital investment sentiment remains so bearish.

Foreign direct investment inflows look decent enough in absolute terms, but, as a proportion of GDP not much has changed, and it is still hovering at around 2.5%. Moreover, most of the FDI inflows are narrowly focused on a handful of sectors such as information technology, business process management, and e-commerce, adding little in the way of new capital assets or job creation. Sound policymaking requires quality technical inputs. While Modi is certainly not lacking advice, he does seem unwilling to act on it. No politician likes criticism, but the better ones know how to learn from their mistakes and adapt accordingly.

Modi also relies too heavily on a select group of bureaucrats to implement his vision, forgetting that civil servants are natural incrementalists with little incentive to push through radical reforms. And because reforming India means curtailing the discretionary power of the bureaucracy, why would the civil service cooperate in checking its own power? Transfixed by the stock market, which is in turn dominated by large corporate interests that are also Modi's major political donors, it's their concerns that get priority, particularly when it comes to keeping interest rates low and cutting corporate tax rates.

SMEs don't have any serious influence on stock markets. Hence, the issues faced by SMEs don't get the attention they deserve. The two policy initiatives that have most affected them -- demonetization and the GST implementation -- have been a disaster, completely missing the important role they have to play in boosting overall employment, ensuring fair income and wealth distribution, and boosting economic growth. What Modi doesn't seem to understand is that neglecting small businesses has hurt the overall prospects of India's economy.

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F_aliases%252Farticleimage%252F7%252F6%252F5%252F1%252F29011567-4-eng-GB%252FCropped-1598369763A20200825%2520dry%2520fruit%2520vendor%2520New%2520Delhi.jpg
A dry fruit vendor speaks to a customer in New Delhi: what Modi doesn't understand is that neglecting small businesses has hurt the prospects of the economy. © AP

India watchers may ponder why a government with a comfortable majority is not embracing bolder reforms. The answer also lies in the fact that India has been cursed by a weak and uninspiring political opposition, allowing Modi the luxury of governing in the knowledge that he can probably hang onto power irrespective of how the economy performs.

Given the inherent limitations of India's first-past-the-post voting system, it's easier to win an election by relying on cash handouts and polarizing voters along communal lines rather than implementing much-needed but politically unpopular reform measures. Better economic management may not necessarily lead to electoral wins. That sums up Modinomics.
 
.
I am going to ignore your ranting and focus on key metrics:


1. BD 1971


Literacy: 18%

Life Expectancy: 47 years



2. China 1978

Literacy: 78%

Life Expectancy: 66 years.


By 1978, China already had a lot of heavy industries and was able to build its own trains/ships/planes and had a nearly full nuclear arsenal that included ICBMs capable of hitting the European part of the former Soviet Union. Mao had laid the groundwork over the last 30 years with his single minded and at times ruthless policies(Great Leap Forward).

All it needed was a leader like Deng Xioping to come into power and allow capitalism to flourish, and with the financial expertise of Hong Kong and advanced manufacturing industries of Taiwan thrown in, it boomed with 10% growth per annum average from 1980-2020.

You need to take a step-back and see that China and BD were in totally different positions when BD gained independence in 1971 and China opened itself up to the West in 1978.

My dad recounted that Chinese govt. had an exposition of Chinese industrial products at Sher-e-Bangla Nagar in 1979. Among other oddities shown, a cabinet sized Shortwave radio that ran on large valves. They had not gone into transistor radios even at that point. My father meanwhile at that point had an IC equipped 25" Sony Trinitron TV and a Motorola vehicle-mounted "brick" cellphone courtesy of Citycell analog AMTS network in Dhaka.

But yes- China closed the gaps in spectacular fashion.
 
.
1. BD 1971


Literacy: 18%

Life Expectancy: 47 years
Have I ever said Bd was a Paradise on Earth before 1971? But, you say everything started after 1971 when I see many things were destroyed after 1971 and of course many things are now being built.

Now, note what Banglapedia says about the literacy of Bangladesh in 1951. So, do not please falsify things. Note it was only after 5 years that literacy grew from almost 0% (for Muslims) in 1947 to 21.1% in 1951. It was certainly far above this figure in 1971.

All development works including the social/education sector are an ongoing process. But, you claim BD was just a ZERO country before 1971 and everything came down from the sky after 1971. This is what I say falsification BAL style.

It is an ongoing process/progress since after1947. Even before 1947 BD had 3000 km of railway. How about now? Did our people develop it more? No. But, of course, Metro Rail is a good addition. But, trains in a City metro rail do not run at 100 kph superspeed.

You are such an ignorant fool not having been exposed to trains run in the cities. Learn from others who know better than you.

You forgot to protest my view on so many development works during Pakistan time that your BAL destroyed. BAL also successfully fed us Tk80 per kg salt.

Now, read Banglapedia:

"Literacy in the Pakistan period In the first census people were classified as literate if they could only read clear prints in any language. According to this definition, literates in East Pakistan (1951) constituted 24.7% of the population of age 5 and above and 21.1% of the total population."

The two figures above show that literacy was gradually progressing from 21.1% to 24.7% even within 5 years.

The thing is many guys like you have little ability to analyze data. You have static minds.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom