.....look at the history and tell me there are so many nations would went thought many troubles but did not declare independence or inviting enemy to divide it such an example i find it only in Bangladesh...
Those nations--if at all any--lacked severely in self-respect.
Pak Army's carnage on human life & dignity in 1971 was the last solid proof that Pakistani politicians & Army have no respect in Islam--at least on issues of those days.
So, our boys decided to go for independence. Islam never teaches a muslim to play blind to those muslims who kill and rape other human beings (irrespective of religion) because they are muslims.
I myself is a Muslim and Freedom Fighter without any political loyalty (at that time) and 95% of all FFs were like me. Pure AL activists joined in higher numbers after June-July 71 when FFs' resistance appeared to be really sustainable, and Mujib Bahini was formed in Dehradun by RAW so that they can snatch the leadership & 'ownership-of-freedom struggle' once Bangladesh is free. Yet we took as far assistance India provided us that time, and shall not deny that today. We knew fully clear that certain string is attached to that package of assistance, and perhaps we have to shed more blood to battle a second enemy-in-the-process but we also knew that we--at this very moment--must protect us and our diginity from the 'rogue' brothers who used Islam to exploit us.
Later---after we lost each other---it was found that Pakistan still has some islamic fabric on, so we tried to extend our best to Pakistan, its Army & people. On the other hand, we found India did many good and bad to us---but none so nakedly as 'genocide' and rape.
In fact Pakistan made us suffer also as "Muslims' by making us face questions like: How could Islam allow muslims do such thing to another muslims ? Bads done by India never surpassed the pain inflicted by this salt of question to our raw & open bleeding injury---because here sufferers are 2: we and Islam.
Now, unless you apologise for the crimes Pak Army & politicinas perpetrated or do not pay Bangladesh its due, if any, you still remain as a state of
criminal muslims.
You may be required to pay debts in your own coins by undergoing severe opressions by USA or even India or by your own talibans. Poetic justice can occur.
So, please, do not be too rude to Bangladeshis to whom you have committed serious crimes. 'Tawba' for unlawful grasping of someothers 'haquk' or wealth is not accepted by Allah and Allah does not pardon him till the sufferer does not pardon---you sure know that.
Nuke or any thing will not save you from Allah's wrath if really your Army & politicians had done wrongs to people of the-then-East Pakistan---even few of those were non-muslims. Please do more self-searching & -criticism to ascertain your past mistakes, if any. The best way, if you find the truth, will be to apologize and settle the score amicably.
I have travelled both Pakistan and India recently. As a Muslim I must tell the truth:
1.
People of both countries are friendly to Bangladesh. Pakistanis look at Bangladeshis as brothers, and privately apologize the mistakes of the past. Few also check out whether we know that India is not a real friend. Indians look at Bangladeshis as
good neighbours, and few just check out that we have not forgotten the 1971 assistance. Indians are vastly more secular than they had been 10 years back, and more focussed on economic progress than religious issues. Muslims in India are quite happy to be Indians and are highly patriotic.
Here I stumbled by thinking why Pakistan could not be above regional disparity so as to make the former East Pakistanis equally happy and patriotic. Indian political leadership appear to be highly matured and responsible than Pakistanis' or Bangladeshis'. India indeed has made spectcular progress. I wonder why India is so friendless among SAARC ? They must find out their fault here, and redress appropriately to get 'Neighbors' Certificate' on their way to greater arena
2. Indians, in general, do not have high respect in RAW, and are not much aware in (I) activities of RAW in Bangladesh (II) Plight of Bangladesh due to Farrakka. They are too pre-occupied in own issues to fight their Govt. on our behalf.
Pakistanis are more interested to speak of Islam than to demonstrate Islamic justice or behaviour. If Indians are found to be self-centered, it is understood and is not painful whereas when Pakistanis are found selfish with Islamic slogans at the mouth only, it pains---because Bangladeshis tend to see Indians as 'neighbours' and Pakistanis as 'brothers'.
3. If India continues to shed 'communalism' at the current rate, and becomes 'truly' more secular, and can maintain the parity between various states at current rate, one day Bangladeshis may repent for 'those years with Pakistan'. However, it will be unlikely that Bangladesh would like to be part of Union of India because they already purchased Independence at very high rate of bloods. On the other hand---based on how fast India is changing positively with trustworthy attitude of parity among its own states and population--India, Pakistan and Bangladesh now should think of forming a greater Union. Under current progressive Indian model of central administration, Islam is not under any threat.
4. If India Govt. shows sensible attitude towards Bangladesh in respect of Farakkha, Tipaimukh, and Trade deficit etc., and refrain from one-eyed attitude to AL Govt., and do not press hard for Corridor etc. Bangladesh and India may grew as very good friends.
Similarly if Pakistan apologizes to Bangladesh and settle its scores, if any, and shows few more friendly acts in Islamic way, Pakistan too will become like brothers to all Bangladeshis. AL propaganda will not last too long.
trust me upon request China can choke u to death without military assistance and vice versa..
