@
asad71 Bhai, I still did not receive the answers I asked in post #7 of this thread in previous page.
In a country like Bangladesh, where it is common to have incompetent political leadership (2 Begums) and incompetent Chief of Staff (Gen. Moeen), then my argument is that the Armed forces subordinate senior,. mid-level and junior officers must act outside the chain of command, in national emergencies, where clearly wrong and anti-national command or order is given by these known incompetent leaders.
1. First case for this kind of situation is Gen. Moeen extending Army rule illegally from 3 months allowed in constitution to 2 years, Army officers should have revolted against Moeen and removed him from power to maintain its pledge to uphold the constitution
2. 2nd case would be Gen. Moeen making a safe-exit deal with Hasina and help bring Hasina to power in a rigged election, Army should have revolted against it
3. 3rd case is finally the Pilkhana case, where Army should have violated both orders from Hasina and Gen. Moeen to storm the compound immediately after the Mutiny started
From my limited understanding, it is not Awami League or India, but rather our own Army, whose job is to protect the country from external threat, have failed us and have given the country to foreign agents, because they were not smart enough to understand what their duty really is? Or they are just too corrupt and callous?
In a way, it was poetic justice. Since the Army failed the nation twice (1&2), the same Awami League and India who came to power using the Army, then turned around and tried to deliver a near fatal blow to the Army, so they do not raise their head again, and remain subservient to AL and India.
Again another national emergency is coming up, AL and India trying to set up neo-BAKSAL rule with a sham election and people may rise up against this, what will Army do this time?