What's new

Bangladesh to China ordered 16 F-7BGI light fighter

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bangladesh won't be able to afford SU-35 anytime soon. Procuring the increasingly expensive F-35s is merely a pipe dream.

Look, this year BD has made quite a purchase to make BN strong. BD also is buying land-based air defence system, self-propelled howitzers and many others for BA. It is again buying one sq. of F-7BGI planes. All these require dollar money. This may be one reason why our foreign currency reserve is going down.

Only five years ago it was unimaginable for BD to purchase so many hundreds of millions worth of military hardwares from abroad. BD economy is projected to be rising @7% per anum. In the next 10 years BD's GDP will be almost double of what is today. So, under the changed situation it may be possible to buy something that we cannot dream of today.

BD is certainly looking for the most sophisticated 4.5+ generation fighter planes in the future. There is no doubt about it. The present policy is to strengthen the BN and BA. After this, it will go after big purchase for the BAF. This is what I believe. Our airforce Chief also talked about it in London. However, he cannot be expected to be very frank about the sensitive defence matter in a foreign country, when we are still a 3rd world country.

---------- Post added at 12:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:15 PM ----------

How u can think that Americans will give u F 35 and Russians will give u Su 35 , wat u think after 5years your budget can afford such expensive planes?

BAF does not need 6 sqs. of any of these planes. One or two sqs. would suffice. I think, our economy will allow us to buy those planes if the selling countries agree to it. But, anyway, it is all in the dreams. USA is certainly ready to sell its F-16 planes, but which block I do not know. F-35 could be too expensive for us. And, US may not supply this plane to a country which is not its strategic ally. For example, US has agreed to sell this plane to Japan.
 
In future if BDAF will look to replace MiG29(Air Superiority) they may go for F16 BLK60+, EFT, Su35BM, Grippen or some 5th Gen fighter. If they will replace F7s(point defense) they may go for F16 (Lower block), LCA, FC1.

BD is a poor country. It cannot afford to replace all its fleets. For now, it wants to replace only its A-5s with F-7BGIs. In a few years time BAF will enlarge its fleet with purchase of 2 sq. of 4.5+ generation fighters. Both F-7BGIs and Mig-29s are not supposed to be replaced at that point.
 
F-7MG standard munition:

f7mg-6.jpg
 
Hey, I am kinda noob at this. Can anyone give a brief intro for BD Air Force.
present Strength and future goals (like maintaining parity with neighboring countries)
 
Missiles of BAF:

F-7BG.jpg


f-7m_baf_01016.jpg


pl-7.jpg


f-7m_baf_01021.jpg


f-7m_baf_01019.jpg


Q-5_LT-2.jpg


LS-6a.jpg


---------- Post added at 01:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:00 AM ----------

BAF SAR Helicopter in action:

bell-212_bnaf_01010.jpg
 
As JF-17 is nothing but a F-7 then BD made the right choice of choosing the most advance derivatives of F-7BGI for less money.
 
As JF-17 is nothing but a F-7 then BD made the right choice of choosing the most advance derivatives of F-7BGI for less money.

I must appreciate your decision for choosing a third generation aircraft over a fourth generation aircraft...

And in one line, Design of JF-17 has nothing to do with design of F7...

---------- Post added at 12:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 AM ----------

For those souls who believe JF-17 is not a derivative of Chengdu J-7:


variants_of_j-7_warplane.jpg

Major Sahib now prove what you have stated...
 
For those souls who believe JF-17 is not a derivative of Chengdu J-7:


variants_of_j-7_warplane.jpg

why not those poor who dreaming for f-16 jf-17 j-10 and there poor gov looking for 50 years old world weakest junk third gen fighter which nations throw in garbage now ?:rofl:
 
I must appreciate your decision for choosing a third generation aircraft over a fourth generation aircraft...

And in one line, Design of JF-17 has nothing to do with design of F7...

---------- Post added at 12:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 AM ----------



Major Sahib now prove what you have stated...

Global Security: Reports:

It is widely reported that the FC-1 is a continuation of the "MiG-33 [R33]" program developed in the 1980s. The Russian company Mikoyan OKB Design Bureau, which designs all MIG series of aircraft, sold the design of MIG-33 to the China and Pakistan. This report is the source of considerable confusion, and indeed some rather fanciful speculation. The so-called MiG-33 design used in conjunction with the FC-1 program was apparently a the poorly attested "Product 33" lightweight single-engine project of the mid-1980s. A decade later, the MiG-33 nomenclature was briefly associated with the much larger twin-engine Mig-29M. This confused history has led to observations that the "FC-1 features air inlets on the lateral sides of the fuselage rather than the ventral inlets of the MiG-33. ... the most apparent modifications to the MiG-33 design is the repositioning of the ventral fins from the engine compartment..." These supposed modifications to the mid-90s MiG-33 design actually reflect the fact that the FC-1 has no design relationship to the MiG-33 [MiG-29M].

In July 2003 it was reported that the "SUPER-7" fighter jet was ready to take its maiden flight, although a detailed timetable was not released. China's Super-7 Fighter completed its taxiing test on July 03, 2003 at a test ground of Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Corporation (CAC). As one of the eight major ground tests that must be completed before test flight, the taxiing test is aimed at trying the correctness of the design of electricity supply system, as well as signal connections between the electricity supply system and other external systems so as to provide important data to guarantee a successful first fly. Leiqiang, deputy director of the Chengdu Flight Group's trial flight department under the Chinese Air Force, said on Tuesday he will carry out the maiden flight task. On the day of the first flight, China Central Television (CCTV) will dispatch a special report group to broadcast the whole flight live. Leiqiang, also a "SUPER-7" pilot, and Yangwei, the jet's designer, who is also regarded as the father of "SUPER-7," will be featured on the CCTV program "Face to Face." On 25 August 2003 the FC-1 airplane carried on the initial flight. It flews 17 minutes before it returned to the airport. The serial production of the aircraft was to begin by January 2006.


Wikipedia:

In 1999, Pakistan and China signed the contract to jointly develop the FC-1/Super 7. Initial difficulties in acquiring an avionics and radar package from Europe led to many problems, which was solved in 2001, when design of the airframe was "de-coupled" from the avionics. In 2003, the maiden flight of the first prototype occurred in China. The Pakistani designation "Super-7", meanwhile, were replaced with "JF-17". Later test flights with a modified design occurred in 2006. Deliveries to the PAF for further flight testing and evaluation began in 2007[11] and the aircraft's first public aerial display took place that year in Islamabad. The PAF officially inducted its first JF-17 squadron, No. 26 Squadron, on 18 February 2010 with fourteen aircraft.

Defense Industry Daily: Reports:

Sino Defense reminds us that the JF-17/FC-1 ‘Xiaolong’ has a long history. The site recalls that China signed a $550 million agreement with Grumman in 1986 to modernise its J-7 fighter (MiG-21 copy) under the “Super-7” upgrade project, with US and British firms competing to provide the engine and avionics. The project was canceled after the Tienanmen Square massacre, but Chengdu Aircraft Industry Corporation managed to continue the program with its own resources, and the project was eventually re-branded as FC-1 (Fighter China-1).
 
For those souls who believe JF-17 is not a derivative of Chengdu J-7:


variants_of_j-7_warplane.jpg

Wiki, 2003 GS report and bdmil are your sources, that tells lot about your depth. Perhaps you could tell us what is the evolution path for F7 series? BAF bought these F7 as stop gap for replacing A5. Are you suggesting these will fulfill purpose of fourth generation aircraft?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom