Kazhugu
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 2,128
- Reaction score
- 0
i'm extremely disappointed with the Bangladesh decision, as are many Pakistanis
especially give the fact that we've stood by them almost always on trade and commerce. . .i don't even know what they mean by ''aid for trade'' just because we are lobbying to have tariffs reduced (which incidentally, is a practice which the WTO strives for)
it's kind of ridiculous when the vote of a single country can have an impact on this trade agreement.....votes from so-called competitor nations should not count, for obvious reasons; they have a seperate panel for dispute resolution --if they take any offence or issue to the fact that we are working to end barriers to trade (in the interests of bringing revenues to companies which provide income to people in flood-affected areas)
huh bd is your biggest competitor for eu rmg market share...it doesnt make sense for them to starve themselves to feed you...its just national interest...
well done bd !
---------- Post added at 07:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:50 AM ----------
But weren't Indians earlier protesting against Pakistani arguments of Pakistan having 'preferential trade access to the EU/European markets'?
What happened to all that stuff about 'compete in the market on equal grounds'? Why no criticizm of Bangladesh's comparatively low tariffs on exports to the EU?
And similarly, arguments calling for Pakistan to limit Indian imports into Pakistan, or regulate them and apply higher tariffs, to protect local industry, should be supported by you and other Indians supporting the Bangladesh move.
I am pleasantly surprised by India's decision to not oppose the EU move - my comment was directed more towards specific members who had been arguing against preferential trade access for Pakistan and/or protectionist moves by Pakistan against imports from India to protect local industry.
because they are a LDC (least developed country) in wto terms...while you and us are not...