Bangladesh Protests against human rights violations in India Occupied Kashmir

[Abu Zolfiqar]

it must feel unpleasant that the people you feel you liberated are accusing you of the very thing you claimed to be liberating them from.

Ouch!!!!

 

[Spring Onion]

Okay, so they were loyal to Pakistan and traitors to Bangladeshi Govt in exile.

BD govt in exile at a time when there was NO country by name of Bangladesh ??

Its like if tomorrow there is a Indian Maoist Govt in Exile or Indian Muslim Govt in exile for fomenting terror against a legitimate country

anyway back to the topic Kashmir human rights violation by India

 

[kobiraaz]

The title of this thread is not appropriate. . . . BNP protested against human rights violations in India occupied Kashmir. Not Bangladeshi Government. . . . . The situation in Kashmir Just reminds me 1969 East Pakistan . . .

 

[Tshering22]

The title of this thread is not appropriate. . . . BNP protested against human rights violations in India occupied Kashmir. Not Bangladeshi Government. . . . . The situation in Kashmir Just reminds me 1969 East Pakistan . . .

There's only one difference. We were adversely affected because of inflow of refugees from east Pakistan, whereas in the case of the state of J&K, we'd gladly ask those who've problems with India to leave and join Pakistan. The land remains ours though. Anyone is free to try and take it... and suffer its consequences.

 

[IBRIS]

Since you are an ignorant in Urud language so let me inject some brain in your vege brain.

Razakar mean volunteer so these Bangladeshi nationalist volunteered to protest against maloon occupation behalf of their Muslims brother and sisters in Kashmir. Today or tomorrow, Kashmir will be free because real musalman can not and will not accept the rule of kuffar.

Go tell that to the Arabs and Middle easterners. Because they seem to be cozying up to kuffars.

Why don't you try your own luck first. Before trying to be a spokesperson of musalman's of this world. BTW...what are you doing in country that is ruled by kuffars to begin with. Your bigotry flies out the window when Uramqi is run kuffars.

Kashmir will remain with India and kissi mai kay lal meh dumm nahi, kai aa kay laiy jai.

 

[Ras]

Assamese population will tilt today or tomorrow towards a muslim majority. It is because the Muslim birth rate is higher than the Hindus.

.

So then Assam should leave the Indian union?.

Muslims all over the world go on and on about other people occupying "their" lands but here you are openly saying that a Hindu majority land should be overrun and taken away from them because outsider Bengali's may outnumber them?

Hypocrisy anyone?

Edit: This is the type of thing which scares everyone in the world who are not Muslim. Why do you think people in the west are getting scared of concentrated Muslim populations in their cities. All this will lead is more discriminations by the scared indigenous populations against immigrants.

 

[LaBong]

BD govt in exile at a time when there was NO country by name of Bangladesh ??

Its like if tomorrow there is a Indian Maoist Govt in Exile or Indian Muslim Govt in exile for fomenting terror against a legitimate country

anyway back to the topic Kashmir human rights violation by India

By your logic the world is full of traitors, including whole Pakistani population and perhaps Indian population as well.

 

[kobiraaz]

We were adversely affected because of inflow of refugees from east Pakistan

It happened in 1971.... not in 1969....

we'd gladly ask those who've problems with India to leave and join Pakistan

So, U r asking them to leave their own land coz they hav problem wid india.... !! pathetic... Stop Killing & violating human rights .. Otherwise India wil face the same situation that Pakistan faced in 71 ....

 

[Tshering22]

It happened in 1971.... not in 1969....

Everything doesn't happen spontaneously you know. Takes time. Don't study history from Jamaati leaders.

So, U r asking them to leave their own land coz they hav problem wid india.... !! pathetic... Stop Killing & violating human rights .. Otherwise India wil face the same situation that Pakistan faced in 71 ....

When they slaughtered Kashmiri Buddists Hindus and Sikhs in 89, wasn't it their land? Where was the pan-Kashmiri so called euphoria then? Religious terror disguised as "national struggle" is an old tactic we've seen many times. Yes we're asking them to get our of our land.


About bolded part; who's gonna do it? You or Pakistanis? We welcome you both to try it at your peril.

 

[KS]

So, U r asking them to leave their own land coz they hav problem wid india.... !! pathetic... Stop Killing & violating human rights .. Otherwise India wil face the same situation that Pakistan faced in 71 ....

Whats the big deal..??

Millions left thei ancestral lands,properties and homes during the partition of 1947..Kashmiris are not some Gods chosen ppl.

If they want to finish the unfinished business of Partition,they are welcome to do what the others did during that time - PACK THEIR BAGS AND LEAVE.

 

[LaBong]

It happened in 1971.... not in 1969....

So, U r asking them to leave their own land coz they hav problem wid india.... !! pathetic... Stop Killing & violating human rights .. Otherwise India wil face the same situation that Pakistan faced in 71 ....

Bangladesh situation Can't be compared with Kashmir, let me tell you why.

1. In case of Bangladesh, the local culture and language of Bangladesh was being suppressed under alien culture of North India(yes, North India it is.), Kashmiris are not forced to abandon their Kashmiriyat.

2. Bangladesh had a large contribution to Pakistani GDP which was mainly used in West Pakistan's development, so when both India and Bangladeshi people led a 3rd world country's life, West Pakistanis were rather well-off, specially the feudals and elites.

On the contrary, India doesn't take away a single penny from Kashmir, mainly because there is nothing to take except apples and goats. India have been pumping astronomical amount to Kashmir for development work.

3. Much of Bangladesh's economic and political sphere was dominated by North Indian migrants when native Bangladeshis were made to live like a 2nd class citizen in their own country.

In case of Kashmiris, they are effectively super-citizens of India. They have special status, IPC don't work on them, heck, rest of Indians can't even buy land in Kashmir!

4. Bangladesh had larger population than West Pakistan, so any agitation by BD carried much weight than Kashmiris who are tiny fraction of our population.

5. Considering above points 1, 2 and 3, Kashmiris struggle has not been motivated by reasons which historically caused a nation to strife for independence. Rather, it is necessarily a struggle to create an Islamic state where non-Islamic population will have to live as they ought to live in an Islamic nation(this stance is confirmed by many Kashmiri leader). India, which was created on the basis of religious indifference/harmony(which still haven't been achieved fully yet) can't afford another religiously motivated partition.

 

[Peacefulll]

Since you are an ignorant in Urud language so let me inject some brain in your vege brain.

Razakar mean volunteer so these Bangladeshi nationalist volunteered to protest against maloon occupation behalf of their Muslims brother and sisters in Kashmir. Today or tomorrow, Kashmir will be free because real musalman can not and will not accept the rule of kuffar.

Ooooh, so "real Musalman will not accept rule of the Kuffar, is it"? I will remember this sentence when I read articles and blogs from Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, etc.

In case you don't know of them, I will tell you one of the things they usually say: "Muslim Immigration into the USA must be halted because when Muslims increase, they begin imposing their will on the population, and when they achieve critical mass they begin to violently demand Sharia law and start arguing that true believers are not to be governed by Kuffar (as per Quran). Hence Muslim immigration must be totally stopped into all Western countries."

know what? I used to think that such blogs (there are thousands of them nowadays) are built by rabid right-wing Americans, and I used to laugh at their paranoid Islamophobia. But I have been watching comments on this site (and many others) with great interest, and due to people like you I am being forced to think: "By any chance can it be true, what Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller and others are saying?". The attitude and mentality makes me wonder if they actually have a point.

 

[Skies]

On the contrary, India doesn't take away a single penny from Kashmir, mainly because there is nothing to take except apples and goats. India have been pumping astronomical amount to Kashmir for development work.

You forgot the cloths, beauty and the tourism industry in Kashmir?

 

[kobiraaz]

Bangladesh situation Can't be compared with Kashmir, let me tell you why.

1. In case of Bangladesh, the local culture and language of Bangladesh was being suppressed under alien culture of North India(yes, North India it is.), Kashmiris are not forced to abandon their Kashmiriyat.

2. Bangladesh had a large contribution to Pakistani GDP which was mainly used in West Pakistan's development, so when both India and Bangladeshi people led a 3rd world country's life, West Pakistanis were rather well-off, specially the feudals and elites.

On the contrary, India doesn't take away a single penny from Kashmir, mainly because there is nothing to take except apples and goats. India have been pumping astronomical amount to Kashmir for development work.

3. Much of Bangladesh's economic and political sphere was dominated by North Indian migrants when native Bangladeshis were made to live like a 2nd class citizen in their own country.

In case of Kashmiris, they are effectively super-citizens of India. They have special status, IPC don't work on them, heck, rest of Indians can't even buy land in Kashmir!

4. Bangladesh had larger population than West Pakistan, so any agitation by BD carried much weight than Kashmiris who are tiny fraction of our population.

5. Considering above points 1, 2 and 3, Kashmiris struggle has not been motivated by reasons which historically caused a nation to strife for independence. Rather, it is necessarily a struggle to create an Islamic state where non-Islamic population will have to live as they ought to live in an Islamic nation(this stance is confirmed by many Kashmiri leader). India, which was created on the basis of religious indifference/harmony(which still haven't been achieved fully yet) can't afford another religiously motivated partition.

I was not referring 2 financial, cultural similarities......... I was saying about violations of Human Rights...... anyway thanks for ur useful post......

 

[LaBong]

You forgot the cloths, beauty and the tourism industry in Kashmir?

What's beauty industry?

Kashmiri shawls are mostly internally consumed in India and only economically helpful for Kashmiris themselves, it's not large export oriented business.

Tourism industry is dead since the rise of insurgency.