What's new

Bangladesh is ancient Gangaridai

It is quite difficult to assume to be honest if Gangaridai was an independent sovereign or not.But from the extracts of Diodorus, Curtius or Plutarch, it is clear that they were quite convinced that Gangaridai was indeed a sovereign nation apart from Prasii or Praisoi (Prachi). The nation was armed with such a massive number of foot soldiers, horses or elephants that it is little difficult to assume them not to be independent and as tributary of the Nandas. Most possibly they enjoyed full scale sovereignty with a very active and prosperous port like Tamralipta on the mouth of Ganges.

You are saying a kingdom without a King. Where is the king?
 
.
Bangladesh was never part of India. It was part of British Pakistani empire. These Bangladeshis are descendants of Arabs, Turks, Persians. Unfortunately it is in South Asia instead of Middle East. :omghaha:

They are in South East Asia, ask Kalu miah. :rofl:
 
. . . . . .
I was always led to believe on PDF that all Bangladeshis are descendants of Arab conquerors :undecided:


yes yes, Arabs threw sperm from Arabia that landed in Bangladesh and all became Mulsim.. Big Lolwa...

Some one yesterday called it "Stolkholm syndrom" I call it Zombification... Once bitten by zombies, Human forget there real identities..
 
. . . . . . . .
Back
Top Bottom