What's new

Bangladesh - India Relationship: Challenges for Progressive Politics

i totally agree, muslim bd women should not use anything that is associated with hindu culture, that is the only way to protect bd's identity... :)
only salwar kameez from now on, and no more funny half hindu names.... if you are bdian, its your duty to explain it to your fellow countrymen.... mom, wife, girlfriend... start small at local level...
 
Born of chaos, India lumbers amid turmoil
By Qian Feng Source:Globaltimes.cn Published: 2017/10/4 10:01:02
India, a country frequently covered in the Chinese media, seems to be in constant chaos.
Not long ago, Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, the head of Dera Sacha Sauda, a quasi-religious body based in Sirsa in Haryana state, was convicted and jailed for rape, triggering large-scale violence. In addition, according to a BBC report in August, more than 100 children have died at a public hospital in northern India, which raised concerns over healthcare in the country of 1.3 billion.

And the clashes between police and Gurkha activists in the Darjeeling hills for a separate state for the ethnic minority within the borders of India have been ongoing for several months with no signs of abating. Moreover, the country has seen frequent military frictions with Pakistan in Kashmir. From diplomacy to people's livelihood, India is caught up in disorder.

The cause for the chaos in India, to a large extent, is rooted in history. India experienced short-term unity but long-term separation, and endured frequent invasions. Modern India was born from blood and fire 70 years ago. In 1947, when the British withdrew from the Indian subcontinent, they divided colonial India into two states — one with a Muslim majority (Pakistan), and the other with a Hindu majority (India), leading to the partition of the Indian subcontinent.

The mass migration that followed triggered massive turmoil. There were countless conflicts, killings and clashes between Hindus and Muslims. It was estimated that the partition of India and Pakistan led to at least 500,000 deaths and made 12 million people homeless. The resulting hatred between the two countries is the main source of conflict in Kashmir nowadays.

Chaos has become so pervasive that the country with numerous ethnicities, races, religions and languages, seems to be steeped in disorder. In nationality, with thousands of years of migration, India has a complex mix of nationalities. At present, five ethnicities have a population of over 100 million each and 15 ethnicities have a population of over 10 million. There are also hundreds of minority groups and tribes.

India is not only the birthplace of Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Jainism, but also the home to more than 200 million Muslims and tens of millions of Christians. The country speaks 1652 languages and dialects, and there are as many as 15 languages on its currency notes. In addition, the more than 3,000-year-old caste system in India has divided Hindus into four main social classes, with each enjoying different social status, leading to confrontations. Moreover, after independence from British rule, a pluralistic and diverse society has given birth to many political parties.

Prior to independence, India saw continuous wars and clashes between different religions, nationalities and ethnicities. After independence, a multi-party system was set up. The different parties contested for their own political rights and economic benefits. Parties at the national level engage in partisan fights while the regional ones often stage demonstrations. Such turmoil occurs almost every day. Once confrontations increase, violence may lead to bloodshed.

With the rapid transformation of society, the increasing gap between rich and poor, the fierce competition because of partisan politics, the rising civil rights consciousness, and the amplifying effect of new media, chaos in India will continue to simmer, accompanied once in a while by a cyclical outbreak. It can affect the country's economic development, social stability and international image.

Nevertheless, considering the history of India since independence, chaos in the country will likely be controllable owing to the flexibility of its political system, tolerance of its society, the patience of its people and improved governance. It is unlikely that conflict and chaos will evolve into a subversion of its system and bring adversity to its people.
The author is a research fellow at the National Strategy Institute of Tsinghua University and executive director at the Chinese Association for South Asian Studies. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1069033.shtml
 
Just add some points here...Bindi is not an exclusive and sole identity of Hindu women...You might see women from South and North East India do not wear Bindi for themselves...Rather, i see even Muslim women and in general Bengali women wear Bindi as a sign of Bengali culture along with their cotton saree...
 
Born of chaos, India lumbers amid turmoil
By Qian Feng Source:Globaltimes.cn Published: 2017/10/4 10:01:02
India, a country frequently covered in the Chinese media, seems to be in constant chaos.

On Chinese...for their attitude towards India, I remember a saying from Gandhi which incidentally is proving correct......I guess India has reached to the third stage now, per saying.

upload_2017-10-4_14-55-45.png
 
চীনের সঙ্গে বন্ধুত্বে বাংলাদেশের ওপর ক্ষোভ পিনাক রঞ্জনের

pinak.jpg


ঢাকায় নিযুক্ত ভারতীয় সাবেক হাই-কমিশনার পিনাক রঞ্জন চক্রবর্তী বলেছেন, রোহিঙ্গা সংকটে সমাধানে বাংলাদেশের উচিত চীনের সঙ্গে আলোচনা করা। কারণ চীন রোহিঙ্গা ইস্যুতে মিয়ানমারের পুরোপুরি পক্ষে এবং মিয়ানমারের বিশেষ বন্ধু। যেহেতু প্রয়োজনে বাংলাদেশ চীনের কাছে ছুটে যায় এখন তারাই সাহায্য করুক।

রোহিঙ্গা সমস্যা ও সমাধানে ভারতের ভূমিকা ও বাংলাদেশের প্রত্যাশা নিয়ে বিবিসি বাংলার সঙ্গে এক সাক্ষাৎকারে তিনি এসব কথা বলেন।

‘ইন্ডিয়া ইকোনমিক সামিটে’ অংশগ্রহণ করতে পররাষ্ট্রসচিব শহীদুল হক দিল্লি সফর করছেন। বৃহস্পতিবার (৫ অক্টোবর) সন্ধ্যা ৬টার দিকে রোহিঙ্গা সংকট নিয়ে ভারতীয় পররাষ্ট্রসচিব এস জয়শঙ্করসহ ভারত সরকারের শীর্ষ নেতৃত্বের সঙ্গেও আলোচনায় বসার কথা রয়েছে। বাংলাদেশ চায় মিয়ানমারের সঙ্গে ভারতের সুসম্পর্ক কাজে লাগিয়ে রোহিঙ্গা সংকট নিরসনে আরও ইতিবাচক ভূমিকা পালন করুক। কিন্তু ভারতের পক্ষে সমস্যা সমাধানে বাস্তবে কতটুকু এবং কী করা সম্ভব?

এমন প্রশ্নের জবাবে পিনাক রঞ্জন বলেন, আমার মনে হয় না ভারত বেশি কিছু করতে পারবে। বাংলাদেশে ভাবছে ভারত সমস্যা সমাধান করে দেবে। এটাতো আর ভারতের সমস্যা নয়, এটা মিয়ানমারের সমস্যা। চীন এই সমস্যার সমাধান চায় কিনা জানিনা। কারণ চীন মিয়ানমারের পুরোপুরি পক্ষে আছে। এখন চীনও বাংলাদেশের বিশেষ বন্ধু হয়েছে। চীনকে জিজ্ঞেস করুক চীন কি চায়? যখন কিছু দরকার হয় তখনতো চীনের কাছে ছুটে যায় বাংলাদেশ। এখন চীনই সাহায্য করুক। বাংলাদেশ চীনকে বলতে পারে, তোমরা অন্যদিকে সাহায্য করছো, তবে রোহিঙ্গা সংকট সমাধানেও সাহায্য করো।

বাংলাদেশ এবং মিয়ানমার দুই দেশই ভারতের বন্ধু। এই সম্পর্ক ভারতের কূটনীতিকদের জন্য উভয় সংকট তৈরি করেছিল। আপনার কি মনে হয়, বিদ্যমান সংকটে ভারত ভারসাম্য আনতে পেরেছে?

এ প্রসঙ্গে পিনাক রঞ্জন চক্রবর্তী বলেন, রোহিঙ্গা সমস্যা যতদিন থাকবে ততদিন ভারসাম্য করা মুশকিল হবে। রোহিঙ্গারা কি বাংলাদেশেই থাকবে, নাকি মিয়ানমারে চলে যাবে- এ বিষয়ে একটি সমাধান দরকার। মিয়ানমারের সরকার বলেছেন, আমরা রোহিঙ্গাদের ফিরিয়ে নিয়ে যাব। তার জন্য অপেক্ষা করতে হবে।

রোহিঙ্গা সমস্যা সমাধানে বাংলাদেশ ভারতের সহায়তা চায়। দু’দেশের মধ্যস্তততার ক্ষেত্রে ভারত এগিয়ে আসতে পারে বলে আপনি মনে করেন?

এ প্রসঙ্গে পিনাক রঞ্জন চক্রবর্তী বলেন, ভারত তো সাহায্য করছে। ভারত বাংলাদেশকে ঋণ দিচ্ছে, রোহিঙ্গাদের ত্রাণ দিচ্ছে। আমরা মিয়ানমারের উপর চাপ সৃষ্টি করিয়ে দেব, মানে মিয়ানমারের সমস্যা আমরা সমাধান করে দিব- এটাতো হবে না। ওদিকে চীনতো এক পায়ে দাঁড়িয়ে সরাসরি মিয়ানমারের পক্ষ নিয়েছে। বাংলাদেশ ভারতে কাছে আশা করতে পারে কিন্তু এটা সমস্যাটা যে ভারত একাই সমাধান করে দিবে তাতো হয় না।
 
চীনের সঙ্গে বন্ধুত্বে বাংলাদেশের ওপর ক্ষোভ পিনাক রঞ্জনের

pinak.jpg


ঢাকায় নিযুক্ত ভারতীয় সাবেক হাই-কমিশনার পিনাক রঞ্জন চক্রবর্তী বলেছেন, রোহিঙ্গা সংকটে সমাধানে বাংলাদেশের উচিত চীনের সঙ্গে আলোচনা করা। কারণ চীন রোহিঙ্গা ইস্যুতে মিয়ানমারের পুরোপুরি পক্ষে এবং মিয়ানমারের বিশেষ বন্ধু। যেহেতু প্রয়োজনে বাংলাদেশ চীনের কাছে ছুটে যায় এখন তারাই সাহায্য করুক।

রোহিঙ্গা সমস্যা ও সমাধানে ভারতের ভূমিকা ও বাংলাদেশের প্রত্যাশা নিয়ে বিবিসি বাংলার সঙ্গে এক সাক্ষাৎকারে তিনি এসব কথা বলেন।

‘ইন্ডিয়া ইকোনমিক সামিটে’ অংশগ্রহণ করতে পররাষ্ট্রসচিব শহীদুল হক দিল্লি সফর করছেন। বৃহস্পতিবার (৫ অক্টোবর) সন্ধ্যা ৬টার দিকে রোহিঙ্গা সংকট নিয়ে ভারতীয় পররাষ্ট্রসচিব এস জয়শঙ্করসহ ভারত সরকারের শীর্ষ নেতৃত্বের সঙ্গেও আলোচনায় বসার কথা রয়েছে। বাংলাদেশ চায় মিয়ানমারের সঙ্গে ভারতের সুসম্পর্ক কাজে লাগিয়ে রোহিঙ্গা সংকট নিরসনে আরও ইতিবাচক ভূমিকা পালন করুক। কিন্তু ভারতের পক্ষে সমস্যা সমাধানে বাস্তবে কতটুকু এবং কী করা সম্ভব?

এমন প্রশ্নের জবাবে পিনাক রঞ্জন বলেন, আমার মনে হয় না ভারত বেশি কিছু করতে পারবে। বাংলাদেশে ভাবছে ভারত সমস্যা সমাধান করে দেবে। এটাতো আর ভারতের সমস্যা নয়, এটা মিয়ানমারের সমস্যা। চীন এই সমস্যার সমাধান চায় কিনা জানিনা। কারণ চীন মিয়ানমারের পুরোপুরি পক্ষে আছে। এখন চীনও বাংলাদেশের বিশেষ বন্ধু হয়েছে। চীনকে জিজ্ঞেস করুক চীন কি চায়? যখন কিছু দরকার হয় তখনতো চীনের কাছে ছুটে যায় বাংলাদেশ। এখন চীনই সাহায্য করুক। বাংলাদেশ চীনকে বলতে পারে, তোমরা অন্যদিকে সাহায্য করছো, তবে রোহিঙ্গা সংকট সমাধানেও সাহায্য করো।

বাংলাদেশ এবং মিয়ানমার দুই দেশই ভারতের বন্ধু। এই সম্পর্ক ভারতের কূটনীতিকদের জন্য উভয় সংকট তৈরি করেছিল। আপনার কি মনে হয়, বিদ্যমান সংকটে ভারত ভারসাম্য আনতে পেরেছে?

এ প্রসঙ্গে পিনাক রঞ্জন চক্রবর্তী বলেন, রোহিঙ্গা সমস্যা যতদিন থাকবে ততদিন ভারসাম্য করা মুশকিল হবে। রোহিঙ্গারা কি বাংলাদেশেই থাকবে, নাকি মিয়ানমারে চলে যাবে- এ বিষয়ে একটি সমাধান দরকার। মিয়ানমারের সরকার বলেছেন, আমরা রোহিঙ্গাদের ফিরিয়ে নিয়ে যাব। তার জন্য অপেক্ষা করতে হবে।

রোহিঙ্গা সমস্যা সমাধানে বাংলাদেশ ভারতের সহায়তা চায়। দু’দেশের মধ্যস্তততার ক্ষেত্রে ভারত এগিয়ে আসতে পারে বলে আপনি মনে করেন?

এ প্রসঙ্গে পিনাক রঞ্জন চক্রবর্তী বলেন, ভারত তো সাহায্য করছে। ভারত বাংলাদেশকে ঋণ দিচ্ছে, রোহিঙ্গাদের ত্রাণ দিচ্ছে। আমরা মিয়ানমারের উপর চাপ সৃষ্টি করিয়ে দেব, মানে মিয়ানমারের সমস্যা আমরা সমাধান করে দিব- এটাতো হবে না। ওদিকে চীনতো এক পায়ে দাঁড়িয়ে সরাসরি মিয়ানমারের পক্ষ নিয়েছে। বাংলাদেশ ভারতে কাছে আশা করতে পারে কিন্তু এটা সমস্যাটা যে ভারত একাই সমাধান করে দিবে তাতো হয় না।

Another Kolkata Aatel who is still deluded about Indian political/cultural 'superiority' and 'thought leadership'. :lol:

Who asks these people about their 'opinion'....?? Our journalists are a bunch of d*mb-f*cks.

Another 'has been' govt. servant trying to stay relevant, another 'nobody'.
 
Then I realized that in the Bangladesh context it means "Wannabe Kolkata Aantel (intellectual)", i.e. "Chetona subscriber", or if you want to be really direct - "Indian lackey".
Yes, this is the truth and this Chetona subscribers are a bunch of cowards. This cowardice has percolated to them from the Kolkata Babu intellectuals.
 
Yes, this is the truth and this Chetona subscribers are a bunch of cowards. This cowardice has percolated to them from the Kolkata Babu intellectuals.

I know some back-boneless people in Bangladesh really want to imitate other people, but what would prompt someone here to imitate a rotted away, 'has been' shell of a self-important 'babu' culture that has pretty much nothing to claim anymore, even in mostly down-in-the-dumps Eastern India.
 
Unhelpful neighbors thrust entire responsibility for Rohingyas on Bangladesh
P K Balachandran
551219528-1_mini.jpg

Abdul Rahman, 21, cares for his four-month-old daughter Sangida. Her mother was shot dead by soldiers in Myanmar while trying to flee to Bangladesh. Tommy Trenchard/Caritas

Unhelpful and hostile neighbors have thrust the enormous burden of looking after 400,000 Rohingya refugees from Myanmar on the slender shoulders of Bangladesh when the latter is just beginning to make progress on the economic front.

After telling Bangladesh that it is fully with it on the Rohingya issue (to assuage anger in that country over India’s statement that the Rohingya problem is a terrorist one), the Indian government told the Supreme Court on Monday, that the Rohingyas are a “serious threat” to India’s security and that the court must not interfere with plans to deport 40,000 “illegal immigrants”.

It is not clear if the Rohingyas will be shipped to Myanmar or pushed into Bangladesh from where they entered India. If Myanmar refuses to take them, as they well might, the hapless refugees may have to be pushed into Bangladesh to add to the lakhs already there. In fact, The Hindu has reported that the BJP-ruled Indian state bordering Bangladesh like Assam and Manipur have already told their police to “push back” incoming Rohingyas.

Myanmar’s stand is even more unhelpful than India’s. Myanmar seems to be determined to push the entire population of one million Rohingyas out of the country because they are not considered to be native to Myanmar, but as Bengali Muslim immigrants.

The entire Myanmarese nation, military and civilian, has joined together to support State Counselor Aun San Suu Kyi’s tough military line against the Rohingyas.

While Russia has said that outside intervention will only further divide the communities in Myanmar and that the Suu Kyi government is doing its best to look after the Rohingyas, China like Myanmar and India, sees the Rohingya issue as a terrorist one. And unlike India and Russia, China has forthrightly supported military action.

Thus, Bangladesh has been caught in a cleft stick, between an adamant Myanmar on the one hand and an unsympathetic and non-cooperative neighboring countries on the other.

All that India is willing to do is to send some relief material and make feeble attempts to persuade the Aung San Suu Kyi to keep civilian casualties and displacement to the minimum.

China, which believes in strong arm methods to quell rebellions, will do nothing of that sort. Russia, which has no direct stakes in Myanmar unlike India and China, will be silent.

Bangladesh’s ruling party, the Awami League, is to take up the Rohingya issue with Beijing during a forthcoming visit to China. But experience shows that the powers-that- be in Beijing rarely ever change policy on anybody’ appeal ignoring long term strategic and economic interests.
UN’s Role
In this context, the UN’s role becomes significant. But since the Aung San Suu Kyi regime is opposed to UN intervention (Suu Kyi is boycotting the on-going UN General Assembly session), the world body cannot play a political role. All it can do is to be allowed to look after the displaced and suffering Rohingyas in Myanmar and Bangladesh to some extent with financial and other assistance.
India’s Contentions
Meanwhile, the Indian government told the Supreme Court on Monday that any decision to deport Rohingyas would be an “executive decision” over which the court has no jurisdiction, India Today website reported.

The Rohingyas are a “very serious potential threat to national security”. They are “indulging in anti-national activities and channeling funds through hawala (private non-banking and illegal) channels, the government said citing intelligence reports.

“The Rohingyas are also found to be very active in Jammu, Delhi, Hyderabad and Mewat, and have been identified as having a very serious and potential threat to the internal/national security of India,” the government said.

Referring to “security agencies’ inputs and other authentic material”, the government said there were indications of “links between some of the Rohingyas with Pakistan-based terror organisations and similar organisations operating in other countries”.
Buddhists Under Threat
According to the centre, there is a “serious potential and possibility of eruption of violence by the radicalized Rohingyas” against Buddhists in India.

“The right to reside and settle in the country is available only to citizens and not to illegal immigrants,” the government argued, asserting that India is not bound by the UN convention on refugees, as it is not a signatory. It also said the influx of illegal immigrants had “a direct detrimental effect on the fundamental and basic human rights of country’s own citizens,” the government mentioned.

Chief Justice Dipak Misra posted the next hearing on October 3, and said: “We want to first see the legal position. What’s the jurisdiction of court and what kind of jurisdiction can we invoke.”
Case Background
The Supreme Court is hearing the petition of two Rohingyas registered as refugees under the UN – Mohammad Salimullah and Mohammad Shaqir – who have said that their deportation is against their fundamental rights.

Around 40,000 Rohingyas have settled in India. About 16,000 are registered with the United Nation’s refugee agency. Last month, minister of state for home Kiren Rijiju told Parliament that Rohingyas are illegal immigrants and that the government aims to deport them.

The United Nations’ top human rights body criticised the government plan to deport Rohingyas, saying India “cannot carry out collective expulsions, or return people to a place where they risk torture or other serious violations.”

The Indian government rebutted that sharply saying enforcing its laws to deal with possible security threats posed by illegal migrants cannot be seen as a lack of compassion. “This chorus of branding India as villain on Rohingya issue is a calibrated design to tarnish India’s image… It undermines India’s security,” Mr. Rijiju tweeted.
http://southasianmonitor.com/2017/0...t-entire-responsibility-rohingyas-bangladesh/
 
12:00 AM, October 24, 2017 / LAST MODIFIED: 03:50 AM, October 24, 2017
Bangladesh comes first
Says Sushma Swaraj about India's neighbours, promises to resolve 'irritants' in bilateral relations
sushma_4.jpg

Sushma Swaraj
Diplomatic Correspondent
India's External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj yesterday said Bangladesh comes first among all of India's neighbours as part of a neighbourhood policy her government adopted.

The countries' bilateral ties are becoming stronger, she added.

"Our foreign policy follows neighbourhood first approach. Parshi pehele, lekin Bangladesh sabse pehele [neighbours first, but Bangladesh before all]," she said in Hindi.

Sushma said these while inaugurating the new Chancery Complex of the High Commission of India at Baridhara and 15 India-funded development projects of Tk 71.64 crore in Bangladesh.

Sushma, who arrived in Dhaka on Sunday, jointly held the Fourth Joint Consultative Commission meeting with her Bangladesh counterpart AH Mahmood Ali.

Promising to sincerely resolve “irritants” between Bangladesh and India, she at Baridhara said the relations between the neighbours are now outstanding, and that both countries are working to resolve these issues in the spirit of “friendly relations and with right intention”.

Though she did not specify the nature of the issues, she apparently hinted at the question of sharing water of common rivers, particularly of the Teesta, which has been pending since September 2011.

“I can assure you we [India and Bangladesh] will solve all irritants with sincerity.” Sushma left Dhaka at 1:15pm.

Calling AH Mahmood Ali her 'brother and dada', she referred to the peaceful solution to the disputes over Maritime Boundary and Land Boundary Agreement with Bangladesh.

The prime ministers of the two countries laid a strong foundation of cooperation which is expanding day by day. "I am confident we would be able to take the relations to greater heights in the times to come."

She also emphasised on investing in young people and said they are the future leaders of the two nations.

The High Commissioner of India Harsh Vardhan Shringla described the achievements of the Indian High Commission here, including easing the visa process and development projects.

Inauguration of 15 development projects

The External Affairs Minister of India formally inaugurated 15 development projects in sectors including education, healthcare, IT, water supply and social welfare with the grant assistance of India.

According to documents, the 15 development projects have been chosen keeping in mind the geographical spread, socio-economic benefits and priorities of the Bangladesh government.

Eleven water treatment plants are being built in southern Bhandaria Upazila in Pirojpur. The plants will provide desalinated potable drinking water to 150,000 people.

Some 36 community clinics will also be built.

Reconstruction of Ramna Kali Temple, which was destroyed by the invading Pakistani army in 1971, is also included in the projects. The main temple, a five-storey guesthouse, a deep tube-well in the temple premises and a gate would be built.

In addition to three Lines of Credit of $ 8 billion, India has been extending grant assistance for small socio-economic projects.

In the past three years alone, Sushma said 24 India-funded grant assistance projects were completed. They included construction of students' hostels, installation of tube-wells, cultural centres and orphanages.

Presently 58 projects, including city development projects in Rajshahi, Khulna and Sylhet, are being implemented.

The Chancery Complex of the High Commission she inaugurated at Baridhara is on five acres of land allotted in 1993 through a reciprocal govt-to-govt arrangement.

The Chancery complex consists of the residence of the High Commissioner, a housing block, a sports complex, and a hall for recreation.

Foreign Minister AH Mahmood Ali, Health Minister Mohammed Nasim, Environment and Forest Minister Anwar Hossain Manju, Prime Minister's Political Affairs Adviser HT Imam, Foreign Secretary Md Shahidul Haque, Indian Foreign Secretary Dr Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and other high officials, educationists and journalists were present at the event.
http://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/bangladesh-comes-first-1480789
 
04:52 PM, October 26, 2017 / LAST MODIFIED: 04:58 PM, October 26, 2017
Constructive approach needed to repatriate Rohingyas
Indian Foreign Secretary Dr S Jaishankar says
Star Online Report
Indian Foreign Secretary Dr Subrahmanyam Jaishankar today said a ‘constructive’ approach is necessary to deal with the issue of repatriation of the displaced Rohingyas, who are staying in Bangladesh and India after fleeing persecution in their home state of Rakhine in Myanmar.
Dr Jaishankar said this while speaking at a discussion on prospects of India-Japan cooperation in the Bay of Bengal and Asia-Pacific regions, reports The Hindu.

Terming the exodus of a large number of Rohingyas from Rakhine state to Bangladesh a matter of concern, the Indian foreign secretary said it would have to be seen how they can return to their place of origin, adding that it would not be easy.

After holding talks with both Bangladesh and Myanmar, India feels that the situation is better addressed with practical measures and constructive conversation rather than doing very strong condemnation, he said.

The exodus has become a humanitarian emergency and a sober, locally sensitive approach is needed to deal with it, Jaishankar also said.

India is an ‘aspiring leading power’ in the South Asian and Bay of Bengal regions, and thus it has regional responsibilities to shoulder, he added.
http://www.thedailystar.net/rohingy...m_medium=newsurl&utm_term=all&utm_content=all
 
Does India want honest relation with Bangladesh?
Abdur Rahman Khan

front01.jpg

Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj’s visit to Dhaka last week manifested another round of commitment for stronger ties with Bangladesh. The visible outcome was the opening of the new chancery complex of the Indian High Commission in Baridhara, Dhaka.

During the ceremony, she also launched 15 development projects being funded by India in Bangladesh. The development projects, worth about $8.7 million, are in the areas of education, health care, information technology, water supply, and social welfare.
Beyond strategic partnership
“India is following a policy of neighbours first, and among the neighbours Bangladesh is foremost,” Swaraj said at the ceremony, describing bilateral relations as having gone beyond a strategic partnership.

Her visit however, did not produce any joint statement with her Bangladesh counterpart
.
On Rohingya issue, Sushma Swaraj said that they should return to their homeland and India was helping Myanmar to develop Rakhine state for better livelihood.

However, there was no discussion on major bilateral concerns like the Teesta water sharing that defied solution for years.

Prior to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Dhaka in June 2015, Bangladesh Foreign Minister AH Mahmood Ali had asked reporters to have patience on Teesta deal. He also had said the issue relating to sharing of Teesta waters was being discussed behind the scene. And after nearly long three years it still appears to have remained concealed “behind the scene.”

The maiden visit of Sushma Swaraj as Indian external Minister in 2014 had indicated a paradigm shift in India’s role in the matrix of political forces in Bangladesh. The 2014 Sushma Swaraj visit outlined the parameters within which the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government would conduct their bilateral relations with Bangladesh.

At that time Sushma Swaraj said, “I come to Bangladesh with a message of friendship and goodwill from the newly elected Government in India. I come with the goal of enhancing our relationship and mutual understanding. I come with the belief that the potential of our partnership is vast. I come with the faith that the people of both our countries desire and deserve closer relations and concrete results”.
It was less than a month after Swaraj visited Bangladesh in 2014, the UN’s Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) based in The Hague had delivered the verdict resolving the long standing maritime dispute between Dhaka and New Delhi.
However, people in Bangladesh witnessed helplessly that they had permanently lost their claim on South Talpatti Island.
Sushma’s difficult mission

This time Sushma said Bangladesh gets “priority among all its neighbours” as per India’s neighbourhood policy. She said the relationship between Bangladesh and India is moving ahead in a faster pace.

Indian External Minister also wished that Bangladesh should have a general election participated by all parties. It may be sounding a positive tone to BNP whose chairperson Begum Khaleda Zia met Sushma at Hotel Sonargaon.

In her first visit to Dhaka, Sushma also had held meeting with BNP chairperson showing an attitude to Bangladesh very different from what Indian Congress government did by lending total support to Awami League during the general elections held in 2014.

A number of left leaning political leaders, however, argued that contrary to what the Indians wanted Bangladesh to believe, Sushma came to press India’s own interest, not to look after Bangladesh’s interest. CPB Central leader Ruhin Hossain Prince commented that Sushma’s visit was an attempt to strengthen India’s ties with Bangladesh by providing financial assistance.

BSD central leader Razekuzzan Ratan said while providing financial help, India at the same time wanted to wrest Bangladesh out of Chinese military influence. The growing influence of China in Nepal has disturbed New Delhi and it wanted to ensure that this does not happen in Bangladesh.

However, Biplobi Workers Party’s General Secretary Saiful Huq had a different angle to the visit. He said India’s another concern was to suggest that Bangladesh should not depend too much and does not align with the US and the Western countries too closely on the question of Rohingya crisis since India has an interest in Myanmar.
He said, New Delhi wants that Bangladesh should remain tied to India’s sphere of influence regardless of what is happening in the region.
http://www.weeklyholiday.net/Homepage/Pages/UserHome.aspx
 
Rohingya crisis calls for new initiatives in regional politics
Faruque Ahmed
front02.jpg

With India and China supporting Myanmar’s ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in the region Bangladesh has become the unwilling victim of the exodus of refugees to shelter the homeless.
People had expected that Indian external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj during her visit to Dhaka would recognize the concern of Bangladesh and call upon Myanmar to stop the genocide.


Myanmar can’t destroy its ethnic Muslim minority and push them into Bangladesh. The entire world is denouncing the brutality of Myanmar military and as a regional power and Bangladesh’s best friend India was expected to play its due role to resolve the crisis.
Sushma’s guarded statement
But surprisingly her statements at all levels during the visit remained carefully limited to talk about the ‘displaced persons’ without naming Rohingyas by name. This is what the Myanmar government also does to refer to Rohingyas as the use of word Rohingya is banned in Myanmar.
Her suggestion that Bangladesh is India’s best neighbor therefore, appears hollow.

Sushma has voiced concern over the violence in the Rakhine state and hoped normalcy will return to the state with the return of the displaced persons. For this the recommendations of the Kofi Annan Commission need to be implemented. She said long term solution to the situation in Rakhine state is rapid socio-economic and infrastructure development.

India is helping Myanmar with financial and technical assistance for such development and all communities will benefit from it. But many fear that linking the return of the Rohingyas with such economic and infrastructural development risks slowly abandoning their cause.

Critics say if India wants to see the Rohingyas as beneficiaries of its development assistance, it should ask Myanmar to stop killing them and torching their villages.
The community must not be uprooted.
But she refrained from even condemning Myanmar for the killing.


It was evidently disappointing despite Bangladesh government’s call to put sustained pressure on Myanmar to end the crisis.

No wonder, the Indian FM’s statement has to match her prime minister’s open support for the Myanmar government. Indian Prime Minister Mr Narendra Modi expressed his country’s open support to Myanmar over Rohingya issues last month during his visit there saying India understands the country’s position on it.

Sushma Swaraj reiterated it again here further deepening the people’s frustration who were upbeat that she may take the plight of Rohingyas seriously and agree to use India’s power and influence as a friend to protect the Rohingyas.
India can’t annoy Myanmar
The Indian help was rightly expected when the political relations of Bangladesh with India are at all time high and Bangladesh is facing a kind of aggression from its (India’s) another friend on the border. It was expected that India should try to be even handed and help resolve the crisis.
Shushma did not go anywhere near that and only announced providing some aid to the refugees.

As things appear, India has been working on a long-term plan with Myanmar at political and diplomatic level over the past several years and at times at the cost of Bangladesh.
Its Myanmar policy aims at containing China’s influence in that country along its Northeast border where China has finalized a deal with Myanmar to build a deep-sea port at Sithwei in the Rakhine coast.

China is also setting up an industrial state in the region as part of its one belt one road policy initiative prompting India to put all its efforts to woo the Myanmar government and provide matching financial assistance. The Rohingya issue, therefore is not its priority.

Incidentally, India is also working to reduce China’s influence in Bangladesh.

It torpedoed China’s bid to set up a deep-sea port at Sonadia Island in the Bay of Bengal in 2014. China is now going to build that port at Sithwei while the Bangladesh government’s plan to build the deep-sea port at Sonadia has been shifted to Paira closer to Kolkata port.

The Japanese government plans to set up an energy hub at Matarbari Island in the Bay of Bengal including an LNG terminal and coal depots to set up several large coal-based power plants is also going slow while the giant Rampal power plant – with two 1320 MW power production facilities at western border has become a priority project.
Indian diplomats tell the truth
In fact the ‘Look East’ policy of Bangladesh with road and railway link from Chittagong to Thailand and China’s Kunming through Myanmar is no more a priority on the map in the volatile situation.
China is now going to the Bay of Bengal using deep sea port at Sithwei like the ones it has built in Sri Lanka and Gwador in Pakistan to link China with Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea.
Indian diplomats made made no secret of Indian strategy.
Former Indian foreign secretary Kanwal Sibal said in a recent article in an Indian daily that India should give priority to Myanmar over Bangladesh.
He suggested that Myanmar is India’s gateway to the East and it should work with Myanmar to build a highway from India to Vietnam through Myanmar and Thailand.
So India should not see Rohingya issue on bilateral perspective with Bangladesh.


In an interview with BBC former Indian High Commissioner to Dhaka Pinak Ranjan Chakrovarti has bluntly announced that India has no reason to stand by Bangladesh on the Rohingya issue. He said Delhi has closer relations with Myanmar like that of Bangladesh’s special friendship with China.
So Bangladesh should now tell China to do something on Rohingya issue.

He said Bangladesh rushes to the Chinese court whenever it feels like.
So it may now ask China to take some Rohingyas. It is not India’s problem and China must do something if it so believes.

But the fact is that like India, China also has not been helpful to Bangladesh when it comes to the Rohingya crisis. It has been left alone.
They are both supporting Myanmar to protect their interest.

Bangladesh has some strategic value to be the gateway to Bay of Bengal and beyond but its importance has apparently been outmaneuvered.

This is a critical time for Bangladesh and experts believe new initiative is needed now to rework the country’s policies to cope with the changing political landscape.
http://www.weeklyholiday.net/Homepage/Pages/UserHome.aspx?ID=2&date=0
 
12:00 AM, October 27, 2017 / LAST MODIFIED: 01:10 AM, October 27, 2017
Isn’t Bangladesh’s stake worthy?
indian_external_affairs_minister_sushma_swaraj_with_prime_minister_sheikh_hasina.jpg

Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj with Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. PHOTO: PMO
Shah Husain Imam
One can draw two significant messages from Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj's just-concluded visit to Bangladesh:
First,
she has basically reiterated India's position that an incumbent government is obligated to hold the general election, if and when it falls due in a democratic country.
She, however, added, that how an election will be held would be determined by the people.
And she resonates with any champion of democracy when she says all parties should participate in the election.

She responded to these issues, not of her own volition—which may have been interpreted as meddling in another country's affairs—but when raised by BNP leader Begum Khaleda Zia with the former.

The second bottom line
which is of immediate concern relates to an iteration of India's position that all refugees from the Rakhine state must return to their abodes as citizens of Myanmar.
With India endorsing recommendations of the Kofi Annan Commission instituted by the UN (also accepted by Aung San Suu Kyi), grant of citizenship rights to Rohingyas, the cornerstone of Annan's report, is non-negotiable.

Sushma Swaraj's visit to Bangladesh on October 22 was set against the backdrop of a combination of extraordinary circumstances.

In its foreground, however, lay the visit to New Delhi of US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson which took place last Tuesday. Tillerson embarked on the South Asian itinerary including Pakistan and Afghanistan with a statement that the odyssey will culminate in a trip to India “in the face of the growing Chinese influence in Asia.”

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has accompanied the US secretary of state to New Delhi in what has been given out to be the quest for “a new architecture for South Asia.” Tillerson's job has not been helped by the “hidden chaos in the White House,” some pessimists were quick to point out.

At any rate, the US and EU have been all the time toughening their stances against Myanmar. They have already stopped military assistance and are planning to impose travel bans on that country's army generals.
Sanctions on financial transactions are on the way.

Having regard to all these factors, one can argue that the timing of Sushma Swaraj's trip to Dhaka may not have been a mere coincidence. It could have been deliberately designed to tie in with the apparently new equation in the region.

The fourth meeting of the India-Bangladesh Joint Consultative Commission has been overdue. A grey area of distance has been growing in the relationship between New Delhi and Dhaka on the issue of an unprecedented exodus of Rohingyas into Bangladesh fleeing persecution in the Rakhine state of Myanmar. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while meeting Myanmar's de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi in Naypyidaw last month, lost an opportunity, so we thought, of bringing to bear his moral influence on the regime to stop the raging “ethnic cleansing” of a hapless minority.
He gave a pro forma statement condemning “violence” without any reference to the abject victimisation of the Rohingyas.

For a time, the South Block appeared to be siding with Myanmar's official position. Indian officials seemed to believe and, said as much, that a good number of Rohingyas who were found to be in India may have infiltrated via Bangladesh. So, they tried “deporting” several of them across the border into Bangladesh. Our border guards resisted the attempts.

Thus, misgivings had been created that required to be allayed. There appears to have been a shift of assumptions or premises based on which previous posturing had been made.

Bangladesh's sensibilities are beginning to be respected with an underlying concern to make good on a negative signal of alienation put across earlier on. For instance, it is reported that the Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj told our prime minister that Narendra Modi had “advised Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi not to 'destroy' her image on her stance on the Rohingya issue as Myanmar military's action in Rakhine state sparked a global outrage.”

So, we heard Sushma, uttering mellifluous words, “Porshi pehle usse pehle Bangladesh (neighbour first, but Bangladesh come atop the list).”

She is even more specific in her expressing solidarity with Bangladesh: “Bangladesh-India relation goes far beyond strategic partnership.”

One final word in the form of a question to China and Russia which have taken the side of Myanmar when the chips were down in the UN implying their stakes are high in Myanmar.
Isn't Bangladesh's stake worthy? With her size of the economy, trainable human resource reserve, huge potential of natural resource base that can boast maritime and sea-bed bonanza waiting to be harnessed, let alone having a homogeneous, secular society, what does Bangladesh lack that Myanmar can provide?
On the contrary, we have so much to offer to the world.
Shah Husain Imam is a commentator on current affairs and former Associate Editor, The Daily Star.
Email: shahhusainimam@gmail.com

http://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/pleasure-all-mine/isnt-bangladeshs-stake-worthy-1482316
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom