What's new

Babri Masjid case- Indian Supreme Court unanimously strikes down Muslim's petition

Hindus get to build temple on disputed land. Muslims to get 5 acres of land to build mosque.

A win-win scenario. Obviously this will be spun as a defeat for Muslims to create rifts within the community from external players.
 
.
SC orders allotment of alternative land to Muslims for setting up of a mosque while decreeing the disputed site to deity
 
.
Centre will hand over the disputed site to the Board of trustees and a suitable alternative plot of land measuring 5 acres at Ayodhya will be given to Sunni Waqf Board
 
. . . . .
Bjp and RSS will be over the moon.

Giving alternate land for mosque will never be acceptable for Muslims (Sunni waqf board).

Also the timings of verdict set today deliberately done to downplay inaugural ceremony of Kartarpur corridor in Pakistan.
 
. .
Ayodhya Verdict LIVE: Supreme Court rules disputed site will be given to Hindus
ASI's report cannot be ignored, the bench has said. However, a structure like a temple under the masjid can't be basis of claiming ownership now.
SC: Sc rules disputed Ayodhya land will go to Hindus. Muslims will get alternative land

11:09 AM
SC: Court cant decide on faith and belief. On balance of probabilities outer courtyard was with Hindus. Muslims haven't been able to establish sole possession of inner courtyard. The placing of idols was a desecration. Muslims have been denied right to worship by demolition. SC has to remedy this wrong.

11:05 AM
SC: High court partitioned in 3 ways. Was not dealing with partition. Defies logic. Under our constitution all religions are equal. Constitution does not allow judges to distinguish between them.

11:04 AM
SC: On Dec 6 mosque was brought down. Done in breach of court orders. Disputed site is one composite site. Railing by british established nothing. No continuous possession of Muslims of inner courtyard. Hindus were on the other hand were in control of outer courtyard. Damage to mosque and desecration is not as per rule of law.

11:02 AM
SC: There was no exclusion of Hindus from inner courtyard. Hindus has unimpeded control over outer courtyard.

10:59 AM
Nirmohi Akhara is not a shebait or devotee of the deity Ram Lalla: SC
nirmohi-akhara-is-not-a-shebait-or-devotee-of-the-deity-ram-lalla-sc.jpg



10:57 AM
SC: Exclusion of Hindus from inner courtyard was always contested. They continued to pray at the railing into the inner courtyard. So Muslim possession of inner courtyard was always contested. They have not been able to establish possessary control over inner courtyard.

10:56 AM
SC: Hindus never gave up claim over inner courtyard. On the other hand namaz never ceased in inner courtyard nor was it abandoned.

10:56 AM
SC: The railing put up by the British between the inner and the outer couřtyard show that it was considered expedient to maintain peace.

10:54 AM
SC: The Hindus continued to pray at the outer courtyard.

10:53 AM
SC: Mosque was used as a public mosque till 1857. After that they only did Friday prayers till 1934.

10:53 AM
SC: A huge structure like a temple under the masjid can't be basis of claiming ownership now.

10:52 AM
SC: Title cannot be established by faith and belief. Sunni board wants possession of the masjid as a public mosque. Board claim is within time.They claim it was long, continuous and uninterrupted. But the court says it was never uninterrupted and constantly contested by the Hindus.

10:49 AM
SC: Historical records and travelogue show that the Hindus prayed around the disputed site. But these must be dealt with circumspection. Courts must go by evidence.

10:48 AM
SC: Hindus consider Ayodhya as the birth place of Lord Rama. They claim it was at the exact spot on which the largest dome of masjid stand. The inner sanctum sanctorum Whether a belief is justified is beyond ken of courts. Value of a constitution lies in equal deference to both religions.

10:46 AM
SC: No evidence of ownership between 13 to 16th centuries

10:45 AM
SC: Although the mosque was built on a temple and used its ruins.

10:45 AM
SC: ASI has not said whether a temple was destroyed to make the mosque.

10:42 AM
SC: Sunni board confronted by ASI findings said that it may have been an idgah. ASI finding there was a Hindu temple. Beneath the structure the underlying structure was not Islamic.

10:40 AM
SC: Archealogy is not a weak science.

10:40 AM
SC: Sebaitship needs continuous management and control.

10:39 AM
Suit 5 of Ram Lalla is within time. Akhara managed the temple intermittently. Hence not a sebait.

10:39 AM
SC: Suit 3 of Nirmohi Akhara is for sebaitship. Is time barred

10:38 AM
SC: CHI refers to 1991 Places of Worship act which freezes places of worship in 1947. Act is a pledge to secularism and equality of all faiths. Allahabad high court ruling by Justice Sharma was wrong.

10:37 AM
SC: Mosque was built by Mir Baqi. No date can be established. Idols were placed inside in 1949. The land was always nazul plot in records. It is inappropriate for the Court to get into area of theology.

10:35 AM
SC: The judgment traversed history, ideology and politics. But court must stand apart. In holding that one community's feelings cannot prevail over another.

10:33 AM
The Shia plea for ownership of the land has been dismissed. It's a unanimous verdict.

10:31 AM
CJI reading the operative portion of the verdict

10:30 AM
The Ayodhya judgment is being pronounced now.

10:28 AM
Five-judge Supreme Court bench to shortly deliver verdict in Ayodhya land case; Senior advocates K Parasaran, CS Vaidyanathan, Rajeev Dhawan, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and other lawyers representing different parties in the case arrive in courtroom.

10:27 AM
The judges in the bench pronouncing the verdict are: CJI Ranjan Gogoi , Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer.

10:26 AM
High security level meeting

ANI

✔@ANI

https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1193028896205074432

Delhi: Union Home Secretary Ajay Bhalla arrives at Home Minister Amit Shah's residence for high level security meeting https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1193022549778546692 …


ANI

✔@ANI

Home Minister Amit Shah calls a high level security meeting at his residence. National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval, Intelligence Bureau (IB) Chief, Arvind Kumar, and other senior officials to attend the meeting.



469

11:53 PM - Nov 8, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

79 people are talking about this




10:25 AM
Court room has been opened. It's an overcrowded court.

10:20 AM
40,000 cops deployed in Mumbai
At least 40,000 police personnel have been deployed in Mumbai in view of the Supreme Court's verdict on the sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid suit. The situation will be monitored through drone units and live CCTV feeds from the police control room. The financial capital had witnessed communal riots after demolition of the disputed structure in Ayodhya in December 1992 and January 1993. "We are prepared to tackle any eventuality," said DCP Pranay Ashok. He said police are keeping a close watch on every activity in the city and will also deploy SRPF, Riot Control Police, Rapid Action Force.

10:15 AM
Refrain from rumours on social media: Uttarakhand CM

ANI

✔@ANI

https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1193025684366446592

Uttarakhand CM Trivendra Singh Rawat on #AyodhyaVerdict: I appeal to people of Uttarakhand to accept whatever verdict is given by the Supreme Court. No rumours or objectionable comments should be made on social media or other platforms that could adversely affect social harmony.



503

11:41 PM - Nov 8, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

65 people are talking about this




10:14 AM
Punjab CM orders high alert
Punjab chief minister Captain Amarinder Singh on Saturday morning reviewed the state’s law and order situation, and appealed to the people to remain calm under all circumstances. The chief minister, who is at Jalandhar for the historic Kartarpur Corridor inauguration and to lead the first Jatha to the revered Gurdwara, discussed the situation with DGP Dinkar Gupta and other senior officers. He directed the officers to remain on high alert and take all steps to ensure that the state’s peace and harmony is not disturbed at any cost.
 
. .
As expected, Indian Court has given verdict in favor of facist Hindus.



For Hindus only.

It is a win-win for both parties. There will be a mosque and a temple built. It is just that the disputed land will be where the temple will be built.
 
. . .
Indian court rules to hand over Babri Mosque to Hindus for construction of temple
By Reuters
Published: November 9, 2019
TWEET EMAIL
2096406-tz__rcfdaqb_rtrmadp__indiareligiontemple-1573274959-701-640x480.jpg

Policemen stand guard at a gate of Jama Masjid, before Supreme Court's verdict on a disputed religious site claimed by both majority Hindus and Muslim in Ayodhya. PHOTO: REUTERS

NEW DELHI: India’s Supreme Court on Saturday, ending the century-old dispute, has decided to hand over the historic site of Babri Mosque to Hindus for the construction of temple.

In a unanimous judgment, the bench has ordered that a temple must be constructed at the disputed site and the Muslims must be compensated with five acres of land at a prominent place in Ayodhya.

The court also ordered the government to formulate a scheme within three months to implement this order under the Ayodhya Act 1993.
According to The Hindu, the court ruled that the demolition of mosque in 1992 was a violation of law.

Thousands of paramilitary force members and police were deployed in the northern town of Ayodhya, where an ancient mosque was razed in 1992 by hardline Hindus who believe the site is the birthplace of Lord Ram, a physical incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu.

The destruction of the mosque triggered religious riots in which about 2,000 people, most of them Muslims, were killed across the country and led to a series of court battles with various groups staking claim to the site.

A final verdict was delivered by a five-judge bench was headed by the Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

Hundreds arrested ahead of verdict on India’s Babri mosque

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist party has long campaigned on a promise to support the construction of a Hindu temple on the site of the razed mosque.

“It may seem to be just a piece of land but for us it is a pious place where our god was born,” said a senior Hindu leader affiliated with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s party.

The court decision is likely to have a significant impact on fraught relations between India’s Hindus and Muslims, who constitute 14 per cent of its 1.3 billion people.

The government stepped up security not just in Ayodhya but in other communally sensitive areas and rapid action forces have been put on a high alert.

For more than seven decades, right-wing Hindu campaigners have been pushing to build a temple on the site, which they believe was holy for Hindus, long before the Mughals built the Babri mosque there.

A verdict in favour of building a Ram Temple at Ayodhya would be seen as a political victory for Modi, who won a second term in a landslide general election win this year.

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh – parent organisation of Modi’s party – has decided against celebratory processions if the verdict goes in favour of the Hindus, to avoid provoking sectarian violence.

Muslim organisations have appealed for calm to prevent communal flare-ups.




Read more: Babri Masjid , BJP , india
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom