Babri Masjid case- Indian Supreme Court unanimously strikes down Muslim's petition

[HAIDER]

Modi wins.......... but we already knew the verdict........nothing new. Secular india my arse...

A mosque own by Muslims since 1530 ... by the law it is not possible to give such verdict. It is public possession. Verdict given on weekend ... lol.... it is totally against law. Legally benches not form on weekend.
What a joke.
On top Indian govt try to neutralize the Kartarpura Sikh celebration.

 

[Aasimkhan]

The fact is Ayodhya has always been a holy place for Hindus. How would Muslims feel if Hindus want to build a temple in Mecca?

Honestly, some people are making a mountain out of a molehill. This ruling sounds like simple common sense to me.

@pothead

There is no proof there was a hindu temple here. Indian Supreme Court has butchered the rights of minorities to please Hindu hooligans.

 

[NeonNinja]

Minorities get Kartarpur corridor in Pakistan and minorities get baba ji ka thullu in India.

 

[pikkuboss]

It is no longer a Disputed land. It is Ram Janmbhumi now.

 

[Aasimkhan]

Quaid e Azam has once again be proven right. So much for the sham secularism of Gangadesh and Gangadoos.

Indian Secularism is a disgrace. Its a shame for humanity.

 

[Rusty]

was there any doubt that Hindus would win?

It is legal in India for Hindus to go off, destroy any mosque or church claim a fairy tale and have the courts side with them.

Very good news for Pakistan as this is makes it even easier to draw an analogy to Nazi Germany.

 

[SIPRA]

This scoundrel Justice Gogoi has proven to be some Justice "Gangadui".

 

[RIP Pak LAW]

It is a win-win for both parties. There will be a mosque and a temple built. It is just that the disputed land will be where the temple will be built.

Lol at win win situation.. Alternate mosque option was given to Muslims many times but the option was always rejected. This is the most hilarious decision by any supreme Court of the world. Clearly court has backed hindu facists in destroying the mosque. Exact location was mattered most by Muslims.

50-50 decision would had been, if Indian Court had also rejected any construction of temple at that particular site. Temple could also had been built on alternate site. Not to be.

 

[HAIDER]

It is no longer a Disputed land. It is Ram Janmbhumi now.

Seems Ram born every corner of India... where there is mosque there always Ram underneath..... ...Saving Private Ram.

 

[Nityam]

This scoundrel Justice Gogoi has proven to be some Justice "Gangadui".

Too bad he is the Son of the CONGress Chief Minister of Assam

 

[Kathin_Singh]

Masjid todane walon ko Supreme Court Jail bhi daale.. nahi to ye faisla biased hai..!

 

[Aasimkhan]

Hindus get to build temple on disputed land. Muslims to get 5 acres of land to build mosque.

A win-win scenario. Obviously this will be spun as a defeat for Muslims to create rifts within the community from external players.

Why not give 5 acres land to Hindus for temple ? Supreme Court has set the stage for destruction of India. Quaid E Azam was right Hindu fanatics are not ready to tolerate any one. Its a black day for minorities in India.

 

[HalfMoon]

Ayodya done.

Next stop Kasi, Mathura and Kartarpur.

 

[pikkuboss]

Lol at win win situation.. Alternate mosque option was given to Muslims many times but the option was always rejected. This is most hilarious decision by any supreme Court of the world. Clearly court has backed hindu facists in destroying the mosque. Exact location was mattered most by Muslims.

50-50 decision would had been, if Indian Court had also rejected any construction of temple at that particular site. Temple could also had been built on alternate site. Not to be.

Mandir cannot be built at different location. While Masjid can be.

 

[Aasimkhan]

Ayodya done.

Next stop Kasi, Mathura and Kartarpur.

Indian Muslims should now piss on Indian constitution of secularity.