Ayatollah Khamenei: Why is world silent towards massacre of Muslims in Myanmar, Kashmir and Palestin

[Zulfiqar1919]

There was no such point.

There was such a point made by Arabi: "Why doesn't he send some of his Iranian soldiers to Kashmir, Burma and Palestine instead of sending them to slaughtering innocent Syrians?"

You never answered the point underlined.

 

[prashantazazel]

The question is- how long will progressive Iranians tolerate Khomeini? Never met a single Iranian supportive of him.

 

[Zibago]

http://english.khamenei.ir/news/508...y-is-world-silent-towards-massacre-of-Muslims

Respect from Pakistan

 

[Resident Evil]

Show me one proof where Iran supports India on this Issue

Iran is neutral on Kashmir.
In fact in the past one year, Iranian government incl Foreign ministry has not made a single statement on Kashmir.
It has refused to be a part of OIC's contact group on Kashmir (only 4 countries joined it).

 

[raptor22]

This is all true, but you didn't answer the point about Iran actively supporting the murderous Baathist regime in Syria. I think if Khomeini was alive he would never support Assad or his Baathist regime. Why has Iran compromised on its Islamic revolutionary ideology and supporting Syria for strategic regional interests putting it above ideology? By doing so, Iran has lost respect of the Sunni world. Khomeini would never have made this blunder. For all his faults, Khomeini was at least a principled and courageous man unlike this pale skinned Khamanei. Even Muqtada al Sadr acknowledges that Assad is killing his own people and should resign.

There was such a point made by Arabi: "Why doesn't he send some of his Iranian soldiers to Kashmir, Burma and Palestine instead of sending them to slaughtering innocent Syrians?"

You never answered the point underlined.

"cause Iran consider israel as the main enemy of Islamic world , and you know that while Iran helped people of Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan none of the Arab countries have done nothing regarding this issue. not only Iran has been threaten by American and israel with military option it's faced toughest sanctions due to its support of Palestine and opposing israel ...
Regarding Syria, since 2012-13 we've called out for a free and fair election which in all Syrians could participate in order to shape and form their own future through ballot boxes not bullets which was rejected ... the point is the only one that should decide about the future of Syria is Syrian people and no one else has any right to undermine this right or force them to do it or make decision on behalf of them.

Iran and Turkey's secret talks on Syria revealed

 

[Arefin007]

Respect to Ayatollah Khamenei and Iran and Pakistan only two countries upholding ommat while monafegh arab countries in bed with zionists and Islamophobic indians shameless

 

[mohsen]

There was such a point made by Arabi: "Why doesn't he send some of his Iranian soldiers to Kashmir, Burma and Palestine instead of sending them to slaughtering innocent Syrians?"

You never answered the point underlined.

innocent child murders!

Syria conflict: Rebels 'filmed beheading boy' in Aleppo - BBC News

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

he is talking about Kashmir and at the same time Iran is enjoying defence pacts and economic pacts and strategic alliance with the one oppressing the Kashmiri's.

I don't want to say it but he is . . . .

 

[Kaniska]

It sounds strange when Assad can do everything and it is not a humanatarian issue for Iran..but Indian Kasmir is a humanatarian issue...This is called hypocracy at its best....

Any way, it does not matter to us what others think about Kashmir...but it shows Islamic world politics is more abouf optics than really addressing the problem within their own nation..

 

[mohsen]

It sounds strange when Assad can do everything and it is not a humanatarian issue for Iran..but Indian Kasmir is a humanatarian issue...This is called hypocracy at its best....

Any way, it does not matter to us what others think about Kashmir...but it shows Islamic world politics is more abouf optics than really addressing the problem within their own nation..

It's not strange at all, considering the fact that those who accuse Assad, are either bunch of murders themselves or are silent against the incidents in Palestine, Myanmar or Yemen.

No, not strange at all, it has to be this way.

 

[BATMAN]

Sure, but why don' the talk about the genocide in Sistan?

 

[raptor22]

Sure, but why don' the talk about the genocide in Sistan?

????

 

[ziaulislam]

Show me one proof where Iran supports India on this Issue

show me one proof that Iran officially (not the ayotallah whenever it suits them)supports Kashmirs cause(not Pakistani cause, kashmir Muslim cause) i.e right to self voting, whether that is independence or joining either Pakistan or india
iran is doing hypocrasy in kashmir cause, well its ayotalah here not iran, they are pretty much clear in supporting raw in Baluchistan and India diplomatically on kashmir openly
PS: india stands is so called shimla agreement i.e is to solve this issue bilaterally only not on what Kashmiris wants or UN reoslution, and this is what Iran supports

 

[Aramagedon]

If there wasn't wahhabi dogs leading from Riyadh, Muslims could united against their enemies.

Those who accuse Iran supporting legal Syrian regime against bunches of cannibals, rapers, beheaders, etc... should know. Firstly wahhabi najdi dogs are khawarij and should get killed.

Secondly as long as Muslims live on the earth no wahhabi can destroy shrines of daughters of imam Ali (PBUH) or any of prophet's Muhammad (PBUH) relatives.

Wahhabi Nasibi Najdi thugs will annihate very soon.

 

[RoadRunner401]

show me one proof that Iran officially (not the ayotallah whenever it suits them)supports Kashmirs cause(not Pakistani cause, kashmir Muslim cause) i.e right to self voting, whether that is independence or joining either Pakistan or india
iran is doing hypocrasy in kashmir cause, well its ayotalah here not iran, they are pretty much clear in supporting raw in Baluchistan and India diplomatically on kashmir openly
PS: india stands is so called shimla agreement i.e is to solve this issue bilaterally only not on what Kashmiris wants or UN reoslution, and this is what Iran supports

I believe these were your words not mine

lol, he needs to take Kashmir out, Iran openly support India on this

When asked to provide proof as suspected you had nothing to back up your false claims, instead,.... you are asking me to provide well documented Iranian plus Turkish support to Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir

On November 19th 2010 Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appealed to Muslims worldwide to back the freedom struggle in jammu and Kashmir, equating the dispute with the ongoing conflicts of the Greater Middle East region.

1940s and 50s Iran parliament declares "Kashmir inseparable part of part of Pakistan" deputy speaker Syed Ahmed Sarai said: We believe the decision of the security council should be binding, and the Kashmir issue settled through plebiscite under the auspices of United Nations

1952 Iran offer to mediate between India and Pakistan

All you need is brain and eyes oh yes and education, so you can read, history instead of just taking words of Arab worshipers and forgetting who is your friend and foe, alienating everybody to please the ones who never ever even once supported Pakistan on any issue period!!!!!!!