In another stooge act Awami league trying to change Padma pridge design to an expansive and non sustainable one to facilitate indian tata steel business.
Report in Bangla:
AMAR DESH PUBLICATIONS
Report in Bangla:
AMAR DESH PUBLICATIONS
Awami govt proved again - they are indian stooges
- Thread starter idune
- Start date
To our respected WebMaster:
The guy BabarjeetSingha, who was placing a missile here and a missile there for us - I think he does represent the frustrations of his Govt in not being able to subdue us thus far.
There also was no need to delete his remarks because he does not scare us with their missiles. You could tell him to tip those with nuclear warheads to get the best effect.
Thank you
The guy BabarjeetSingha, who was placing a missile here and a missile there for us - I think he does represent the frustrations of his Govt in not being able to subdue us thus far.
There also was no need to delete his remarks because he does not scare us with their missiles. You could tell him to tip those with nuclear warheads to get the best effect.
Thank you
Awami stooge team just finished its pleasure trip to india in name of Tipai dam visit. Awami stooge act could not be more vivid than this. Indian with excuse of bad weather did not even let Awami stooge team to on site of the dam.
Now Awami stooge ministers will try to sell more indian manufactured lie
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tipai team to return without visiting site
Nazrul Islam
Bangladesh’s delegation returns home today from India abandoning its planned field trip to Tipaimukh project site after heavy rains failed its attempt twice.
The 10-member team left Guwahati, from where it tried to reach the site by helicopter on Friday and Sunday, for New Delhi with a hope to visit the project site in India’s Manipur state sometime in dry season, officials who are in constant touch with the team told New Age Sunday.
Former water resources minister Abdur Razzak led the delegation that left Dhaka for New Delhi on July 29 to talk to Indian officials and have a close look at the Tipaimukh dam site amid uproar against the planned Indian structures on the cross border river Barak that flows into Bangladesh rivers Surma and Kushiyara.
The delegation members held talks in Delhi but failed to reach Tipaimukh because of inclement weather in the hilly terrain, according to officials.
On return, the delegation would decide whether it will visit again in the dry season or send an expert group to assess the impacts of the Indian planned multi-purpose dam on downstream Bangladesh.
‘The dialogue will continue at different levels,’ said one official adding that the delegation members will have a meeting tomorrow to analyse the data they have collected on the dam during the visit.
The team, comprising six lawmakers from ruling Awami League and Jatiya Party, three officials and one academic, is learnt to have proposed a similar visit to the dam project in November.
Lawmakers of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami refused to accompany the team, saying that such a trip would be a ‘picnic party’ without adequate presence of experts.
Choosing monsoon period was perhaps a wrong decision, the delegation chief Abdur Razzak told BBC in Guwahati.
The delegation during its stay in New Delhi held talks with Indian power minister Sushil Kumar Shinde and officials concerned. Bangladesh proposed a joint impact study on the project. But no clear signal was given from the Indian side as yet.
The Indian authorities only said that they would not take any scheme harmful for Bangladesh — an assurance given by Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh to prime minister Sheikh Hasina during a meeting on the sidelines of NAM summit in Egypt last month.
The project is a hydro-electric one and there is no possibility of diverting water from the common river, they said.
Environmentalists fear that the Indian project on the Barak river would restrict flow to the Meghna river and cause negative impacts on the ecology of the Sylhet region.
Leader of the opposition and former prime minister Khaleda Zia, in a letter last month, requested the Indian prime minister to drop the project.
The $1.7 billion project, cleared by the Manipur government, is awaiting approval by the Indian cabinet committee concerned. India says the project is designed to produce 1,500 megawatts of hydroelectricity.
http://www.newagebd.com/2009/aug/03/front.html
Now Awami stooge ministers will try to sell more indian manufactured lie
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tipai team to return without visiting site
Nazrul Islam
Bangladesh’s delegation returns home today from India abandoning its planned field trip to Tipaimukh project site after heavy rains failed its attempt twice.
The 10-member team left Guwahati, from where it tried to reach the site by helicopter on Friday and Sunday, for New Delhi with a hope to visit the project site in India’s Manipur state sometime in dry season, officials who are in constant touch with the team told New Age Sunday.
Former water resources minister Abdur Razzak led the delegation that left Dhaka for New Delhi on July 29 to talk to Indian officials and have a close look at the Tipaimukh dam site amid uproar against the planned Indian structures on the cross border river Barak that flows into Bangladesh rivers Surma and Kushiyara.
The delegation members held talks in Delhi but failed to reach Tipaimukh because of inclement weather in the hilly terrain, according to officials.
On return, the delegation would decide whether it will visit again in the dry season or send an expert group to assess the impacts of the Indian planned multi-purpose dam on downstream Bangladesh.
‘The dialogue will continue at different levels,’ said one official adding that the delegation members will have a meeting tomorrow to analyse the data they have collected on the dam during the visit.
The team, comprising six lawmakers from ruling Awami League and Jatiya Party, three officials and one academic, is learnt to have proposed a similar visit to the dam project in November.
Lawmakers of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami refused to accompany the team, saying that such a trip would be a ‘picnic party’ without adequate presence of experts.
Choosing monsoon period was perhaps a wrong decision, the delegation chief Abdur Razzak told BBC in Guwahati.
The delegation during its stay in New Delhi held talks with Indian power minister Sushil Kumar Shinde and officials concerned. Bangladesh proposed a joint impact study on the project. But no clear signal was given from the Indian side as yet.
The Indian authorities only said that they would not take any scheme harmful for Bangladesh — an assurance given by Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh to prime minister Sheikh Hasina during a meeting on the sidelines of NAM summit in Egypt last month.
The project is a hydro-electric one and there is no possibility of diverting water from the common river, they said.
Environmentalists fear that the Indian project on the Barak river would restrict flow to the Meghna river and cause negative impacts on the ecology of the Sylhet region.
Leader of the opposition and former prime minister Khaleda Zia, in a letter last month, requested the Indian prime minister to drop the project.
The $1.7 billion project, cleared by the Manipur government, is awaiting approval by the Indian cabinet committee concerned. India says the project is designed to produce 1,500 megawatts of hydroelectricity.
http://www.newagebd.com/2009/aug/03/front.html
leonblack08
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2008
- Messages
- 4,072
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Khaleda Zia was right terming them going for picnic.
Al-zakir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 8,612
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
I wonder what would be Kalia Razzak reaction? This big mouth Bharati dalal make me laugh.
Irrespective of reasons, it is good to know this Indian Chamcha has not been included in the inner core of AL. He was discarded when he was visiting his favourite DADA country. It was a good slap on his face.I wonder what would be Kalia Razzak reaction? This big mouth Bharati dalal make me laugh.
Last edited:
Jar Kaaj Taar Shaaje, Onno Loker Lathi Baje. Amar Desh columnist is a non-technical person, so without really knowing how a long-span bridge is built he imagined things and wrote his story. Immediately after it was published I have sent a letter to them. I would like to state some of the points in short.
1) A bridge is always built of concrete and steel.
2) In case of a steel bridge, it is not that all the structural components are built of steel, as may be perceived wrongly by a non-engineer.
3) Foundation, built either of pneaumatic caisson or piled, are made of concrete, but with steel bars inside them. A concrete body with steel bar is called RCC or Reinforced Cement Concrete.
4) Pile caps are always built of RCC. These are placed on top of a group of piles.
5) Piers are always made of RCC. These are built on top of the pile caps.
6) Box girders are placed in between adjacent two piers. Box girders may be of Pre-stressed Pre-cast RCC or they may also be of STEEL. For long spans in the Padma Bridge it should obviously be steel-made box girder or truss.
7) If the main central spans are CABLE-STAYED, then the cable material must be made of STEEL.
8) The deck slab for motor carriageway shall be made of RCC.
9) However, the railway line must be supported on STEEL beams.
I do not think, just to purchase TATA steel products from India, the govt is considering a steel made bridge. I have tried to say a bridge is always made of both concrete and steel. However, for long spans, as they are in Padma, the main box girders should better be made of STEEL, because only steel can guarantee longivity.
Stumper
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,226
- Reaction score
- 0
Mate, you sure are different from the ones i see of your lot here. Anyway, thanks for the clarity. Beware if you continue like this, very soon you will be labeled as a "Indian Stooge" if not a RAW agent.
Before continuing the parody again, ask RAWAMY bastards to name only 30,000 deceased in 71. Otherwise, stop UR satanic prophecy over here. BTW we, the Ex-Pakistani-Bengalis got our so-called independence but why did not Bengali-Indians leave India to be with us, who actually engineered it for us? Hope your fish-brain would get some capital to ponder about it.
Pakistan Heads of State or Govt. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Liaqat Ali Khan, Mirza Iskander, H.S. Suhrawardy, Gen. Pervez Musharraf were born in India. Almost all the Pakistan civil servants and P. E. Railway employees were born in India.
Jyoti Basu, many other WB leaders and the present Chief Minister of　Tripura State were born in BD, but are leaders in India. They can help BD by becoming our agents.
Manmohan Singh was born in Pakistan. Pakistan would be very happy if he is an ISI agent. Sonia Gandhi is Italy born. Indian Govt will not like it if she is spying for Italy.
Adolf Hitler was born in Austria, but became the Chancellor of Germany. Napoleon Bonaparte was born in Corsica, which was sold by Italy to France only one year before his birth. As far as I know, Bonaparte was never dumped for spying in favour of Italy.
There are hundred other examples whereby no one can foresay a man to be a spy only because of his birthplace is different from his adopted country. Hope, no one in this Forum is suggesting a Kenyan spy in the White House. If so, then why to blame Gawher Rizvi for being born in Murshidabad.
Last edited:
Go back and read all posts I had made in this regard before making worked up comments on a case which is markedly different than simply originated from different country. Gawher Rizvi had been associated with Ford foundation and with Indian govt/sponsored subversive establishment for long enough to indicate what this guy is up to. His association with ford foundation a well known entry point for RAW in US think tank circus does prove the point that this sort of person could not be trusted for any policy making and influencing position. His Indian identity is just additional reason not to consider him for the post.
Your post clearly shows you know very little on who is doing what in Bangladesh. Rehman Sobhan and his brothers who came from India are doing great damage to Bangladesh for long time. He was infect largely blamed for providing wrong advice to Sheikh Mujib on economic policy and aggravated post independence economy. He is one of the mastermind behind 1/11 regime led by Moeen U and two other Ahmeds. Hasan Imam a known actor who originally from west Bengal also actively running propaganda scheme against Bangladesh. List can go on …..
Last edited:
One more proof india was behind peelkhana massacre. Awami stooge govt installed another indian stooge as BDR DG to destroy what left of BDR.
This indian stooge DG justified killing of Bangladeshis borrowing BSF line so blatantly that he should be tried for sedation.
Report in Bangla:
AMAR DESH PUBLICATIONS
This indian stooge DG justified killing of Bangladeshis borrowing BSF line so blatantly that he should be tried for sedation.
Report in Bangla:
AMAR DESH PUBLICATIONS
Last edited:
Awami indian stooge govt did not give BDR permission to protect bangladesh land and let indian BSF to occupy 100 acres of Bangladesh territory.
Its worth noting Awami stooge govt installed an indian stooge as BDR DG after peelkhana massacre.
Report in Bangla:
AMAR DESH PUBLICATIONS
Its worth noting Awami stooge govt installed an indian stooge as BDR DG after peelkhana massacre.
Report in Bangla:
AMAR DESH PUBLICATIONS
Here is little more details about current BDR chief installed after peelkhana massacre:
Current chief is a "ghoti".
He was somehow accused or associated in President Zia assasination but whatever the reason, was not prosecuted.
He had been trained in India.
Having this kind of history of aligning with indian involvement in Bangladesh makes its more than likely he is in RAW/indian govt payroll.
But his recent action of stopping BDR from resisting indian occupation and indirectly supporting BSF killing Bangladeshis, make it clear; he is another RAW operative in Bangladesh.
Current chief is a "ghoti".
He was somehow accused or associated in President Zia assasination but whatever the reason, was not prosecuted.
He had been trained in India.
Having this kind of history of aligning with indian involvement in Bangladesh makes its more than likely he is in RAW/indian govt payroll.
But his recent action of stopping BDR from resisting indian occupation and indirectly supporting BSF killing Bangladeshis, make it clear; he is another RAW operative in Bangladesh.
SinoIndusFriendship
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2009
- Messages
- 2,387
- Reaction score
- 0
How so true comrade! Vietnam's greatest leader (and "founder"), Ho Chi Minh was Chinese. Laos greatest leader (and "founder") was Vietnamese, forgot his name. The founder of Thailand was Chinese. That's just how the world works.
Similar threads
