What's new

Australian diplomat urges restraint in deadly border spat between India and China

Vanguard One

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
1,307
Reaction score
-7
Country
Ireland
Location
Ireland
Australia has taken another subtle diplomatic swipe at China, this time over its long-running and deadly border dispute with India.

Key points:
  • Australia "opposes any attempts to unilaterally alter the status quo" on the border
  • 20 Indian soldiers were killed in clashes with China last month
  • The dispute centres around border areas in the Himalayas
For decades, the world's two most populous nations have fought skirmishes along a stretch of land that divides the Chinese autonomous region of Tibet from India.

Last month, India said 20 of its soldiers had been killed in clashes with the People's Liberation Army at a disputed border site in the western Himalayas, in a major escalation of the standoff between the two nuclear powers.

An Indian army patrol had attempted to tear down temporary structures erected by the Chinese military on terrain claimed by New Delhi, setting off a brutal six-hour melee in sub-zero temperatures.

Now the ABC has learnt Barry O'Farrell, Australia's newly appointed High Commissioner to New Delhi, has indicated the Federal Government's support for India in the decades-long dispute.

"Australia urges restraint along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), and supports continued moves towards de-escalation," Mr O'Farrell said in a statement issued by the High Commission this week.

"As I told the External Affairs Minister of India [on Thursday], Australia opposes any attempts to unilaterally alter the status quo, which only serve to increase tension and the risk of instability.

"It is important that the bilaterally agreed principles and norms that have helped prevent escalation or miscalculation in the border areas over many decades continue to be observed."

12368064-3x2-xlarge.jpg

Twenty Indian soldiers were killed in a clash with Chinese troops last month.(AP: Aftab Alam Siddiqui)
Foreign Minister urged negotiation
Since the 1960s Australia has not taken sides in the LAC dispute, but diplomatic sources said the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) recently decided to clarify its public position.

When border clashes between Indian and Chinese troops turned deadly last month, Foreign Minister Marise Payne took a more cautious stance, urging both sides to "avoid confrontation".

"Clashes between Indian and Chinese troops in the Galwan Valley, and reports of loss of life, are concerning," she said in a statement issued on June 17.

"During a global pandemic, it is more important than ever that all countries minimise tensions and avoid confrontation in long-standing disputes."

At the time Senator Payne added that Australia was monitoring the situation, but stressed it was a "matter for India and China to resolve through negotiation".

So far, DFAT has declined to comment on what has prompted the clarification of its stance, or whether it has formally conveyed its latest position to Beijing.

The Government's newly stated position on the border dispute comes amid growing expectations that Australia could soon be invited to re-join the Malabar naval exercises involving the United States, Japan and India.

The Government has strengthened its opposition to Beijing's maritime claims in the disputed South China Sea through a formal letter to the United Nations.

The US and Australia also jointly reaffirmed their opposition to the Chinese military build-up in the disputed waters following annual AUSMIN talks in Washington.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08...ver-deadly-border-clashes-with-china/12513852
 
.
People don't realize that the rest of the QUAD (US, Japan, Australia) only wants India to counter China in maritime routes/naval buildup. They could care less about India's land dispute with China (not that they could do anything about it anyway). The inherent nature of a land dispute differs dramatically from that of a maritime dispute ... note China currently one has one land dispute, which is with India, and quite a few maritime disputes. That is why, beyond a few conciliatory words, which judging by this article India hasn't even received, there is nothing the Australia or the rest of the QUAD can do to aid India. I was reading an article earlier today talking about how since India was not receiving any help from the QUAD, they are now turning to Russia for help. We shall see how that goes :lol:.
 
.
Where did it indicate Australia stands on India side? Australia just try to calm down both side. Typical sensational journalism.

Australia still know where most of their money flow from where.
 
.
People don't realize that the rest of the QUAD (US, Japan, Australia) only wants India to counter China in maritime routes/naval buildup. They could care less about India's land dispute with China (not that they could do anything about it anyway). The inherent nature of a land dispute differs dramatically from that of a maritime dispute ... note China currently one has one land dispute, which is with India, and quite a few maritime disputes. That is why, beyond a few conciliatory words, which judging by this article India hasn't even received, there is nothing the Australia or the rest of the QUAD can do to aid India. I was reading an article earlier today talking about how since India was not receiving any help from the QUAD, they are now turning to Russia for help. We shall see how that goes :lol:.

Do you actually think that we need aid ?
A pathetic nation that cant even release their one child soldiers casualities is now concerns about India .
We have nuclear weapons .And except US ,other two also dont have nukes .
So keep that BS to yourselves
 
.
Unless they want their troops to die against China they should mind their own business. It is starting to look like there is going to be action against India sooner or later.
 
. .
Wait what border spat? China has been minding its own business. Are the Australians trying to fan up Indian troubles from two months ago?
 
.
Wait what border spat? China has been minding its own business. Are the Australians trying to fan up Indian troubles from two months ago?
To be fair, I think it would be absolutely in Australia's interest to have Indian soldiers slaughtered by the PLA. The more number of dead Indian soldiers and Indian territory occupied by the Chinese means India moving closer to the rest of the QUAD.
 
. .
I don't see Scott Morrison of worrying too much about foreign affairs as Australia has to deal with the Wuhan virus in Australia first, especially in Victoria.
 
.
I don't see Scott Morrison of worrying too much about foreign affairs as Australia has to deal with the Wuhan virus in Australia first, especially in Victoria.
You mean fort Detrick virus? Try a cheapshot? But I guess u failed badly. :enjoy:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom