Your arguments are baseless and illogical.........
Baseless and illogical? Lol, yeah right, says the person who uses wikipedia as his source of information.
Your think,
"homosexuality and pedophilia have a very strong connection
" ........see below link:-
Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation
The above link says that there is no conclusive evidence.....
"The researchers found that homosexual males responded no more to male children than heterosexual males responded to female children (Freund et al., 1989)."
Again, you didn't even bother reading my post
#45 in which i refute all of these claims homo sympathizers make in defense of homosexuality. As i said, and this is probably the fourth time i'm repeating my self, read my post before posting replying with nonsensical rants.
Coming back to homosexuals and their love of young boys, it is a well known fact and therefore doesn't require any evidence due to its obvious nature that homosexuals and pedophiles have a strong connection.
North American Man/Boy Love Association
One such obvious example is the NAMBL Organization (here is their website:
http://nambla.org/), formed to legalize man-to-boy sexual relationships.
#15."
The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a pedophile and pederasty advocacy organization in the United States that works to abolish age of consent laws criminalizing adult sexual involvement with minors,[2][3]
and for the release of all men who have been jailed for sexual contacts with minors that did not involve coercion.[2][4] Some reports state that the group no longer has regular national meetings, and that as of the late 1990s to avoid local police infiltration, the organization discouraged the formation of local chapters.[4][5] An undercover detective around 1995 discovered that there were 1,100 people on the rolls.[4] As of 2005 a newspaper report stated that NAMBLA was based in New York and San Francisco, and that it held an annual gathering in New York City and monthly meetings around the country.[4]"
Your think,
"anal sex is practiced ONLY by homosexuals and therefore there sexual behavior is unhygienic
"......see link below:-
Anal sex - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is not only my belief but this is also the belief of many Doctors and Medical researchers that homosexual sex practices are unsafe and can cause a lot of harm both mentally, physically, emotionally, and psychologically.
Anal sex is mostly practiced by homosexuals, and for centuries it has been a homosexual sex practice. However it can be practiced between a male and female as well but that doesn't decrease its harmful effects.
#6.
"From a medical standpoint anal intercourse, in contrast to vaginal intercourse, poses serious risk to its participants. The rectum differs from the vagina with respect to suitability for penetration by a penis, limb or inanimate object (Agnew, 1985; Diggs, 2002; Koop, 1990). The vagina is designed to expand, is supported by a network of muscles and produces natural lubricants. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage.
The anus, in contrast, is designed to allow passage of fecal material out of the body. It is composed of small muscles and significantly more delicate tissues. Consequently, anal intercourse often results in anorectal trauma, hemorrhoids and anal fissures. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the anal sphincter loses its tone. Chronic leakage of fecal material has been known to develop from penile/anal intercourse alone; for those engaging in fisting this is a more common problem (Agnew, 1985; Diggs, 2002; Wolfe, 2000). In addition, fisting places the recipient at risk for a variety of anorectal traumas.
Since fisting may result in anorectal trauma and exposure to blood, there is risk of acquiring HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C particularly if the insertive partner has cuts or abrasions on his hands (Sowadsky, 1996). The insertive partner is also exposed to fecal matter. Consequently, fisting has been associated with increased incidence of shigellosis (Aragon, 2007) and Hepatitis A (Sowadsky, 1996), two illnesses transmitted by the fecal-oral route. The greatest medical danger of anal fisting, however, involves the susceptibility to injury of the inner walls of the lower colon. This tissue is very easily torn, but may not be recognized by the individuals involved. Such an injury can lead to an overwhelming infection of the abdominal cavity called peritonitis which may result in death (Diggs, 2002; Wolfe, 2000).
Medically, men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI) and HIV (Diggs, 2002).
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention estimates that gay and bisexual men (men who have sex with men or MSM) in the United States are 50 times more likely to contract HIV than are heterosexual men (Lansky, 2009). This is largely due to having multiple sexual partners and engaging in risky sexual practices, including a high incidence of anal intercourse within this population (Diggs, 2002). For example, the estimated HIV risk with a single sexual exposure through receptive anal intercourse (2%) is 20 times greater than for receptive vaginal intercourse (0.1%), (Pinkerton, Martin, Roland, Katz, Coates, & Kahn, 2004)."
Health Risks: Fisting and other Homosexual Practices
STDs are not only transmitted through homosexuals......infact, if you compare the ratio of heterosexuals infected with STDs to the total number of heterosexuals
AND the ratio of homosexuals infected with STDs to the total number of homosexuals.....then you will get the real picture...........see below link:-
Gay Mental Health
Read carefully, the above links will bust all the myths about gays.........
Again, more nonsense. The total number of Heterosexuals is more than that of homosexuals, in fact in the United States alone Homosexuals only make up 2-10% of the population, yet the homosexuals are more likely to be infected with HIV, Gonorrhea, Syphilis and other STD's than a heterosexual is. In contrast, the ratio of heterosexuals infected with HIV/STD's compared to Heterosexuals not infected is very low.
In a recent CDC report (Center of Disease Control), Men who have Sex with Men (MSM, in other words Homosexuals) are 44 -50 time more likely to contract HIV/STD's than a heterosexual.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/fastfacts-msm-final508comp.pdf
"Gay and bisexual men referred to in CDC surveillance systems as men who have sex with men (MSM)1 of all races continue to be the risk group most severely affected by HIV. CDCs most recent data show that between 2006 and 2009,the number of new infections that occur each year increased among young MSM driven by an alarming 48 percent increase among young, black MSM 13 to 29 years old. These data clearly show the urgent need to expand access to proven HIV prevention programs for gay and bisexual men, and to develop new approaches to fight HIV in this population.
A Snapshot
t
MSM account for nearly half of the approximately 1.2 million people living with HIV in the United States (49%, or an
estimated 580,000 total persons).
t MSM account for more than half of all new HIV infections in the United States each year (61%, or an estimated 29,300
infections).
t While CDC estimates that only 4 percent of men in the United States are MSM, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among
MSM in the United States is more than 44 times that of other men (range: 522 989 per 100,000 MSM vs. 12 per
100,000 other men).
High prevalence of HIV:
The existing high prevalence of HIV among gay and bisexual men means MSM face a greater risk of being exposed to infection with each sexual encounter, especially as they get older. For young black MSM, partnering with older black men (among whom HIV prevalence is high) may also lead to increased risk.
Complacency about risk:
Among young MSM in particular, complacency about HIV may play a key role in HIV risk,since these men did not personally experience the severity of the early AIDS epidemic. Additional challenges for many MSM include maintaining consistently safe behaviors over time, underestimating personal risk, and the false belief that because of treatment advances, HIV is no longer a serious health threat. We must reach each generation of MSM
and develop programs that can help MSM remain uninfected throughout the course of their lives."