Arundhati Roy Says ‘Kashmir should get Azadi from bhookhe-nange Hindustan’

[Awesome]

Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code defines the offence of sedition as follows: “Sedition. Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine”. But Explanation 3 says “Comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section”.

These guys must immediately be charged with sedition and put into jail for inciting people to break the country apart.

Where the hell is GoI???? Sleeping??

Bhooke-Nange Hindustan slogan is not of A Roy, but of the Kashmiri riotiers

"Jaan se Pyara Pakistan, bhooka nanga Hindustan". What will you do, hang all of Kashmir since you folks claim them all to be your people?

 

[Spring Onion]

she is a bigot of highest order, she was crying when azaad (a Maoist) was killed by security agencies because she thinks it was a cold blood murder. but she does not cry when this bastards maoist kills security forces in the same manner. what a shameless lady.

No she is not.
And she was right because Indian forces Killed Azad (Maoist leader) at Point Blank after trapping him for talks.

It is sad that he came to negotiation table and Indians once again proving hypocrites killed him at Point Blank in custody.

 

[Spring Onion]

Arundhati Roy is a cousin of Pranoy ray,ND tv owner whose wife is also the sister of the communist chief Prakash Karat's wife.

These guys belong to the communist clubs of different hues and their opinion should seen those parlance.

Communists in India are Indians. Right?

What is wrong with communists then ?

 

[Blue Sword]

This feeling is totally biased. She is on Nobel prize run. or want cheap publicity.
She has feeling for separatist but she can not feel what has happened to those thousands people and to their family that are killed by the militant infiltrated to India from other side of Country.

 

[Awesome]

This feeling is totally biased. She is on Nobel price run. or want cheap publicity.
She has feeling for separatist but she can not feel what has happened to those thousands people and to their family that are killed by the militant infiltrated to India from other side of Country.

Militants kill Indian army people, which should be lauded, not condemned.

Condemnation should be given to the GoI who is sending your army people into harms way. Your people are forcefully in Kashmir, Kashmiris are not coming to New Delhi and killing your people.

 

[Von Hölle]

Militants kill Indian army people, which should be lauded, not condemned.

Condemnation should be given to the GoI who is sending your army people into harms way. Your people are forcefully in Kashmir, Kashmiris are not coming to New Delhi and killing your people.

Please spare us your skewed narrative.. Indian army has as much right of being in J&K as Pakistan army has Pak admin Kashmir or for that matter in Gilgit-Baltistan.

 

[KS]

No she is not.
And she was right because Indian forces Killed Azad (Maoist leader) at Point Blank after trapping him for talks.

It is sad that he came to negotiation table and Indians once again proving hypocrites killed him at Point Blank in custody.

I dont know where you get these news from

Azad was not coming for talks.That propaganda was created by the Maoists sympathiser Vara Vara Rao and by the journalist who had gone to meet him.

And second he was not shot at PBR.There was an encounter and he was killed in that.His pistol along with the bullets fired have been recovered.

And tell,if PA got a chance like this with Muslim Khan (he is also a spokesperson of a terrorist organisation, Azad's contemporary) what will they do??

 

[Blue Sword]

Militants kill Indian army people, which should be lauded, not condemned.

Condemnation should be given to the GoI who is sending your army people into harms way. Your people are forcefully in Kashmir, Kashmiris are not coming to New Delhi and killing your people.

Kashmir is always a part of India. Where from the term came forcefully? The king then signed agreement with India not with Pakistan that is what History says.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1947 and 1948
Further information: Kashmir conflict, Timeline of the Kashmir conflict, and Indo-Pakistani War of 1947
The prevailing religions by district in the 1901 Census of the Indian Empire.

Ranbir Singh's grandson Hari Singh, who had ascended the throne of Kashmir in 1925, was the reigning monarch in 1947 at the conclusion of British rule of the subcontinent and the subsequent partition of the British Indian Empire into the newly independent Union of India and the Dominion of Pakistan. As parties to the partition process, both countries had agreed that the rulers of princely states would be given the right to opt for either Pakistan or India or—in special cases—to remain independent. Kashmir's population was overall 77 per cent Muslim but with internal areas of non-Muslim majority. It shared a boundary with both India and Pakistan. Pakistan anticipated that the Maharaja would accede to Pakistan, when the British paramountcy ended on 14–15 August. When he hesitated to do this, Pakistan launched a military attack disguised with a front of guerrilla infiltration of Pashtun tribals meant to frighten its ruler into submission. Instead the Maharaja appealed to Mountbatten for assistance, and the Governor-General agreed on the condition that the ruler accede to India." Once the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession, "Indian soldiers entered Kashmir and drove the Pakistani-sponsored irregulars from all but a small section of the state.

Source : Kashmir - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[GUNNER]

And tell,if PA got a chance like this with Muslim Khan (he is also a spokesperson of a terrorist organisation, Azad's contemporary) what will they do??

He ain't anymore. He's been in prison for some months now. Pick some other example !

 

[GUNNER]

Hardline Bhartiya Janata Party leader Ram Jethmalani says dialogue with Pakistan is a must to resolve the disputed Kashmir issue.

His remarks came in support of Indian writer Arundhati Roy's speech in which she said that Kashmir has never been an integral part of India.

The BJP leader says that dialogue with Pakistan is compulsory under 1972 Simla agreement to resolve the Kashmir dispute.

His remarks have embarrassed the BJP which immediately distanced itself by saying that these were Jethmalani's personal views.

Meanwhile Indian media quoting Home Ministry sources say that the government is considering to book the writer for making seditious remarks.

Arundhati Roy has criticised the move by regretting that the nation has to silence its writers who speak up their minds.

 

[Dash]

This lady has no country as told by her, then why will she say that Kashmir need to be freed from India. where will she live then...Mars???

 

[KS]

He ain't anymore. He's been in prison for some months now. Pick some other example !

Fine yaar....I was just using an analogy.

Who knows maybe the CRPF team tried to apprehend him,but in the ensuing encounter he was killed.

The main point is,CPI-Maoist is a terrorist organisation banned under Indian Terror Laws and he as the spokesperson of such an outfit is a terrorist.So there is no need to sympathise with him

Just before he was killed ,his organisation killed 170 civilians in a massive train-derailment - one among many instances where civiliansa are continually murdered by these maoists

p.s,.: I personally think he should have been aprrehended and must be forced to spell out their locations.But who knows ,the CRPF might have tried that also/

 

[garibnawaz]

What about Asma Jahangir and Hina jilani.

Add two more names. Altaf Hussein and Ansaar Burney.

GB

 

[Spring Onion]

I dont know where you get these news from

Azad was not coming for talks.That propaganda was created by the Maoists sympathiser Vara Vara Rao and by the journalist who had gone to meet him.

And second he was not shot at PBR.There was an encounter and he was killed in that.His pistol along with the bullets fired have been recovered.

Maoist leader Azad shot at point-blank range: report




Maoist leader Cherukuri Rajkumar alias Azad was shot at point-blank range by the Andhra Pradesh Police and not in an encounter, a news-magazine has claimed.

"The post-mortem conducted on the body of Maoist leader Azad categorically establishes that he was killed at close range with a handgun in a fake encounter by the Andhra Pradesh Police on July 1 at Adilabad," the news-magazine claimed in a report.

It claimed to have accessed the post-mortem report of Azad on which it sought the opinion of three experts in three different cities.

"Three leading forensic medicine and wound ballistic experts, who were given copies of Azad's post-mortem report without revealing the identity of the deceased, have come to the conclusion that the victim was shot from a distance of 7.5 cms or even less," the magazine said in a press release.

The post-mortem report records a 1-cm oval-shaped wound just a few inches above the left nipple where the bullet entered, tore through this heart and exited from the back just between the ninth and the tenth vertebrae, it said.

Maoist leader Azad shot at point-blank range: report

And tell,if PA got a chance like this with Muslim Khan (he is also a spokesperson of a terrorist organisation, Azad's contemporary) what will they do??[/B]

Why you need comparison with others to legtimize something in India in the first place.

Secondly we have declared TTP as terrorist outfit so we have no issue in killing terrorists on the other hand Indians are in a fix you guys either should declare Azad and Maoists as terrorists or dont kill them on different excuses.

 

[Awesome]

Kashmir is always a part of India. Where from the term came forcefully? The king then signed agreement with India not with Pakistan that is what History says.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1947 and 1948
Further information: Kashmir conflict, Timeline of the Kashmir conflict, and Indo-Pakistani War of 1947
The prevailing religions by district in the 1901 Census of the Indian Empire.

Ranbir Singh's grandson Hari Singh, who had ascended the throne of Kashmir in 1925, was the reigning monarch in 1947 at the conclusion of British rule of the subcontinent and the subsequent partition of the British Indian Empire into the newly independent Union of India and the Dominion of Pakistan. As parties to the partition process, both countries had agreed that the rulers of princely states would be given the right to opt for either Pakistan or India or—in special cases—to remain independent. Kashmir's population was overall 77 per cent Muslim but with internal areas of non-Muslim majority. It shared a boundary with both India and Pakistan. Pakistan anticipated that the Maharaja would accede to Pakistan, when the British paramountcy ended on 14–15 August. When he hesitated to do this, Pakistan launched a military attack disguised with a front of guerrilla infiltration of Pashtun tribals meant to frighten its ruler into submission. Instead the Maharaja appealed to Mountbatten for assistance, and the Governor-General agreed on the condition that the ruler accede to India." Once the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession, "Indian soldiers entered Kashmir and drove the Pakistani-sponsored irregulars from all but a small section of the state.

Source : Kashmir - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kashmir has never been part of India, UN resolutions says so. It is disputed territory