what a PATHETIC attempt to deflect the attention away from the topic; not to mention the fact that there are huge numbers of Pakistanis who were always indigenous to where they are today.
It is only a certain section of Pakistanis that call Kashmir an unfinished agenda of partition. But then when one reminds them of what happened during partition, suddenly it is a 'pathetic attempt to deflect attention'.
Regardless of how many Pakistanis were autochthonous to the land which today constitutes Pakistan, the fact remains, that millions of people were displaced, almost overnight, from their own ancestral lands, as they were forced to make a choice between their past and future. If that could happen then, and you people consider Kashmir to be an unfinished agenda of the same partition, why are you averse to the idea of a section of Kashmiris, like Geelani, migrating to Pakistan. Since you are concerned with their well being, and not interested in the land they hold in India, isn't it a perfect solution.
Remember, a State owns the land, not the people that live on it.
Partition changed the rules; and said partition took place despite all odds against Jinnah Saab --not limited to just the hullabaloo of congress and its britisher backers
So whats stopping from another partition - partition of Kashmir. Let LoC be IB and then give a certain period of time, say a period of 12 months from a cut-off date, to the Kashmiris of both the sides to migrate to the other side.
That way you can have all your beloved Geelanis, because after all, you are not interested in their land. Its the people that matter, isn't it?
