What's new

Article 370 is India’s internal issue: Bangladesh

I don't know what to believe and what not too ……. Ummah is lost !!! Where ? I don't know !!


Their are only 2 solutions to Kashmir ..
  1. A peaceful one , Pakistan get 100% Valley with all Muslim majority areas of Ladkah (about 30% to 40% ) rest of Ladkah go ti India and 50% of Jammu comes to Pakistan , rest go to India.. (I know this is only my wish and will never going to happen).
  2. WAR for Full Kashmir ……….. 2nd option is war ,, way better then dying with thrust and water shortage in future after india building dams in IOK (after 370 gone)..
Sir, our elite don't have courage for any of above ….. we don't want war or we cant fight one (may be because we are puzzies) .. Kashmir is in lockdown from last 20 days.. We Pakistanis are only doing chit-chat .. One day will come when Kashmiris will give away( when the realize Pakistanis already )….
Quid-E-Azam said Kashmir is Life line of Pakistan ……. And india is cutting it very slowly and painfully and we are only making noises .. Thanks a lot..
I also think India/Pakistan should hold a plebiscite in both regions and divide the state proportionate to percentage of votes that each of the parties get. No point in extending the suffering for the people of j&k.

What Musharaff and Manmohan singh tried to do was brilliant. Extending high autonomy to both parts for 25 years and holding a plebiscite at the end of it to decide which way Kashmiris want to go.

We would have been in relative peace these 25 years focussing on growth and each courting Kashmiris to join the union. We let the opportunity go.
 
.
So why not a referendum for all of Jammu and Kashmir to decide their future? If it will be so great for them like you say then why would India not pursue such a logical path to achieve legitimacy for their annexation of the occupied territories? :-)
You asking an Indian this question is like asking a Pakistani why don't you do the same in Balochistan(Pakistan is confident that only few are creating problem there).
.
 
.
When you have limited resources you don't feed one fully and then go for other states,you distribute proportionately.
True! But, this type of logic doesn’t make sense when you try to apply this on Kashmir issue...

You guys are making that heavenly place a hellhole like every other indian states...

You asking an Indian this question is like asking a Pakistani why don't you do the same in Balochistan(Pakistan is confident that only few are creating problem there).
.
Mate Balochistan isnt a disputed territory. Kashmir is...
 
.
You know, what india did with Kashmiris is an act of aggression against Muslims! In my pov and understanding of Fiqh, under Islamic Fiqh Kashmiris now has legitimate ground to declare Jihad against India. (You can ask more knowledgeable person)

So, NO there will not be any peace, separatism will only increase...

And muslims never lost a legitimate Jihad...
Anyone fighting for a religious cause will be decimated in the current world. Just try it.
 
. . .
Dude India is a Hindu state.
We aren't, but your country totally acted against the vision of your Bangabandhu when changes were made in your constitution to declare Islam as your state religion.

Anyone fighting for a religious cause will be decimated in the current world. Just try it.
They will not hesitate to paint an irreligious/atheist/agnostic Indian citizen as a Hindutva fundamentalist for speaking the truth like you have.
 
. .
We aren't, but your country totally acted against the vision of your Bangabandhu when changes were made in your constitution to declare Islam as your state religion.


They will not hesitate to paint an irreligious/atheist/agnostic Indian citizen as a Hindutva fundamentalist for speaking the truth like you have.

Dude, India has a policy to allow any Hindu to settle.
How is India not a Hindu state?
 
.
Dude, India has a policy to allow any Hindu to settle.
How is India not a Hindu state?
Dude, India has always welcomed persecuted minorities in our lands- be it the Parsis or the Tibetans or the tribals from Bangladesh, since time immemorial. Nothing has changed..
 
.
Dude, India has always welcomed persecuted minorities in our lands- be it the Parsis or the Tibetans or the tribals from Bangladesh, since time immemorial. Nothing has changed..

Why not allow in Rohingya that are persecuted by Myanmar?
Don't play the potential terrorist card please.
 
.
Why not allow in Rohingya that are persecuted by Myanmar?
Don't play the potential terrorist card please.
We have our fair share of Rohingyas too, and are doing a lot for them diplomatically and materially, more than your China under whose insistence the entire episode took place.
 
.
We have our fair share of Rohingyas too, and are doing a lot for them diplomatically and materially, more than your China under whose insistence the entire episode took place.

Why are you trying to kick them out then?

They have every right to claim refugee status since thier homeland is not safe to return to.

Dude, admit that India has now become a Hindu nationalist state under Modi.
 
.
Why are you trying to kick them out then?

They have every right to claim refugee status since thier homeland is not safe to return to.

Dude, admit that India has now become a Hindu nationalist state under Modi.
What are your cucks at the helm doing then? Allowed millions of Rohingyas into your own country like no other in the world would do. And grovel before a war torn country with your superior economy, as most of you like to boast about. So don't blame others for your own inadequacies.
 
.
What are your cucks at the helm doing then? Allowed millions of Rohingyas into your own country like no other in the world would do. And grovel before a war torn country with your superior economy, as most of you like to boast about. So don't blame others for your own in

Why you changing subject?

BD allowed in Rohingya for humanitarian reasons.
Should we have allowed Myanmar to butcher them all?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom