What's new

Arrested former MNA was carrying Baitullah's letter for ex-ISI General

TalibanSwatter

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 27, 2009
Messages
912
Reaction score
0
Not surprising at all ...who could this pro-taliban former ISI general be?

News Jang Group

ISLAMABAD: The case of ‘missing’ former MNA Maulana Shah Abdul Aziz, who was picked up by an intelligence agency after his meeting with Lal Masjid cleric Maulana Abdul Aziz as it transpired later, took an alarming new turn with the damning revelation that he may have been carrying a letter of Baitullah Mehsud addressing to a former high profile ISI general, known for his strong pro-Taliban views, it was reliably learnt.

The former MNA belonging to the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) had contested and won the 2002 elections from Karak District after defeating PTI supremo Imran Khan. The alleged secret letter of Baitullah Mehsud recovered from Shah Abdul Aziz was reportedly in the possession of the top khaki spy outfit.

When asked about the contents of the letter, sources within the Interior Ministry said the TTP chief in this letter had expressed his deep gratitude for the justifications, the former general had been offering to the media while defending the Taliban and their philosophy. More importantly, sources said the TTP chief was really happy with the retired general for opposing the military operation against the Taliban.

The sources said the letter was however significant only to the extent that it was allegedly written by Baitullah and the fact that it was being carried by Shah Aziz confirmed the nexus between the two, but it did not in any manner whatsoever suggest any link, direct or indirect, between the retired general and Baitullah Mehsud. Also, it was told that in all probability, the general was not even aware of the existence of such a letter.

A top level source in the Interior Ministry claimed that despite the fact that Shah Aziz was being monitored closely for some time, the secret agency did not have any intention to formally arrest him solely on the basis of his perceived links with the Taliban, fearing his arrest could lead to serious agitation in the ranks of pro-Taliban religious parties both within and outside the parliament. But much to the surprise of these agencies, Shah Aziz was found travelling with Fidaullah, one of the Taliban leaders and considered to be the mastermind of the suicide bombing in Islamabad and other areas in the recent past. His presence in the company of Fidaullah had alarmed the intelligence agency, which decided to take him in for further interrogations.

The sources said even at the point of actual arrest of Shah Abdul Aziz, the agency was still toying with the possibility of letting him go out of sheer political considerations but it all changed when one of the officers searching the vehicle in which Shah Abdul Aziz was travelling with Fidaullah found the letter in Shah Aziz’s briefcase. Shah Abdul Aziz reportedly had been tasked with delivering this letter to the retired general.

The source said the recovery of Baitullah Mehsud’s letter addressing to a top former spymaster had surprised even those who were deputed to investigate the former MNA known for his close links with the Taliban.

The sources said this secret letter had actually confused the intelligence agency officials, as they were wondering how to produce this letter in the court of law to justify the custody of Shah Abdul Aziz, as they believed that it would open a Pandora box and might bring a bad name to the army itself.

The sources said such a decision could seriously jeopardise the state’s case in the court of law. The sources said the intelligence agency had only two charges to frame against Shah Aziz, if it was serious in punishing him for his links with the Taliban and their suicide bombers. The sources said one potential charge that could be brought against him was that he was travelling with a wanted terrorist, Fidaullah. The second charge could be that he was carrying a secret letter written by the top terrorist of the country. But, the sources said, the intelligence agency had decided not to produce this letter in any court of law for the image of the institution.

Sources close to the intelligence agency said that though the detainee admitted that the letter was written by Baitullah to the retired general, they were trying to get to the bottom of the matter. They said the letter can be fake or sent with ulterior motives. They said the agency officials are also trying to verify the statement of the detainee about the letter.

This correspondent could not contact the retired general despite efforts. However, the generalís close circle suspected a plot to fix up the general. They believed that such efforts were made in the past but remained futile.

Separately, after remaining quiet for over a month since Shah Abdul Aziz was picked up by the top secret agency, a writ petition was filed in the Islamabad High Court by his brother, seeking his release.

Mehboob Elahi, the brother of Shah Abdul Aziz, confirmed in his petition that his brother was arrested when he was with Fidaullah, a young man from NWFP. The Islamabad SSP in his press conference had claimed on June 1 that Fidaullah was involved in a number of terrorist activities. But Mehboob Elahi in his petition alleged that his brother was kept in illegal confinement in the Aabpara police station along with Fidaullah as both were arrested together. He said his brother was innocent and police did not register an FIR against those who he believed had kidnapped his brother. He rejects all kinds of charges against his brother.

This correspondent contacted ISPR DG General Athar Abbas and sought his comment on the report that Shah Abdul Aziz was arrested by a secret agency and that he was carrying the letter by Baitullah Mehsud, his reply was crisp and short as he said: “I have no information on this subject”.
 
Last edited:
But, the sources said, the intelligence agency had decided not to produce this letter in any court of law for the image of the institution.

My question:

Is image of an institution more important than the image of the nation?

An other question:

Should a person be unhooked just because he has been an ex-MNA and relates to some big religeous parties?

An other one:

Should the hypocrite Mullahs given so much importance, always? While they get a big share in power from every government and they undermine the same government every time by such activities/conspiracies.
 
Oh really so how do you know there are so many of them, Would you like to spit out some names, You really need to chang your username, It should be "hatefulindian" :yahoo::woot::rofl::smokin:

To start with, Gen Akhtar Abdur Rahman & Lt Gen Javed Nasir. Both helped Mujahidin in Afghanistan with whatever they could. It was after Nasir's tenure that Taliban took the form of what it is today, thanks to Nasir.

After that, General Mahmud Ahmed has always resisted US presence in Afghanistan & many in US believed that he was a tacit supporter for Taliban. In fact he was retired prematurely by then Pakistan government due to his image of a Taliban apologist.

Then comes Nadeem Taj. Another one who treaded almost the same path as that of Ahmed. And always accused by the US as a 'double dealer' when it came to militants.

And of course, the great Hamid Gul. So count the number yourself. Some of the above may be dead now & the letter may not be intended for them. But as you asked me, here is the list of Taliban apologist ex-ISI chiefs.
 
How can we point fingers at Hamid Gul without anything to back our claim. Seriously we should learn some restraint before accusing any one that shares a different opinion.
 
To start with, Gen Akhtar Abdur Rahman & Lt Gen Javed Nasir. Both helped Mujahidin in Afghanistan with whatever they could. It was after Nasir's tenure that Taliban took the form of what it is today, thanks to Nasir.

After that, General Mahmud Ahmed has always resisted US presence in Afghanistan & many in US believed that he was a tacit supporter for Taliban. In fact he was retired prematurely by then Pakistan government due to his image of a Taliban apologist.

Then comes Nadeem Taj. Another one who treaded almost the same path as that of Ahmed. And always accused by the US as a 'double dealer' when it came to militants.

And of course, the great Hamid Gul. So count the number yourself. Some of the above may be dead now & the letter may not be intended for them. But as you asked me, here is the list of Taliban apologist ex-ISI chiefs.

The allegations against Gen. Nadeem Taj are speculative and unsubstantiated.

He was one of Musharraf's closest aides, and I find it unlikely that he would end up supporting policies counter to those Musharraf was pushing.

The others were involved in various capacities in the Afghan Jihad, Taliban regime in Afghanistan etc.
 
Hamid Gul? you sure ??? i thought it was for KC Verma :undecided:

amazing to see how things change here...
a few days a go you guys were damn sure RAW is funding Baitullah..
and now????? :angry: :disagree: :angry:
 
hamid gul has been only supportin afghan talibans and not TTP ****. infact he has been supportin military operation against these ppl.
so either its someone else or lik it said that this does not prove any links of general with baitullah.
 
Apparently, Hamid Gul was jailed for a while in 2007.

I find it curious that the Saudis would go out of their way to request his release.

November 2007

ISLAMABAD: Saudi Arabia has quietly asked the Pakistani authorities to immediately release the ailing Lt General Hameed Gul who is incarcerated in Adiala jail along with his son Abdullah, as the retired general is considered an old friend of the Kingdom and King Abdullah is one of his admirers.

It would be the first time that the Saudis or any foreign government has made a request for release of a retired Army general who has been put in the jail for opposing the policies of General Musharraf.

Saudi ambassador to Pakistan, Ali Awadh Asseri, has conveyed a message to the Pakistani authorities that the old friend of the Kingdom should be released as he is widely respected for his services to the cause of Islam during the Afghan Jihad.

The Saudis, being the major financiers of the Jihad, used to send millions of dollars through General Gul and were very impressed with his honest handling of the money. He impressed them more when he returned a very expensive gift to his Saudi hosts.

The Saudi ambassador is said to have contacted Uzma Gul, his daughter and expressed his deep sorrow over the ordeal. He is said to have told Uzma that the Saudi government was taking up the issue of his release.

When contacted by The News, Uzma Gul confirmed that she had received a telephone call from the Saudi ambassador in Pakistan. She also confirmed that the ambassador had informed her that the Saudi government was “requesting” Islamabad authorities to release the general. She however refused to give further details of her telephone talk with the Saudi ambassador.
 
Back
Top Bottom