Pakistansdefender
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2016
- Messages
- 3,770
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Why didn't election commission disqualify these two bastards yet and banned the political party.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TTP was a terrorists organization, funded by raw, so if he has demanded for operation against them it mean Mohsin is not on RAW payrol, actually he is working against their interest (RAW's interest).
1- No "my personal source" is not related to this accident, that is general thing, Army controls FC, all commissioned officers are on rotation within army and FC.1- Typical 'my personal source' told me this and that nonsense !!. Tell us something new... And No, Balochistan Police and FC is not Army.
2- Good that you have toned down your rhetoric/propaganda a bit... Nothing wrong with asking for some sort of proof ... But the way you outright declared the DGISPR statement as 'total junk' and 'false propaganda' and then repeatedly alleged (without any proof of course) that LeA's carry out illegal activities in FATA ... If that's not maligning LeA's, I don't know what is... and BTW you provide IT services to what LeA?
3- Irrelevant.. Waiting for you to provide proof that the Army carries out illegal activities in FATA...
. I consider army repeatedly blaming PTM for treason without any proof.
.
buhahahahahahahahahaha
Is bholai badshah (kalia as per PTM) ko to check karo
Okay you got me, I am not that smart, but where are you asking for proof? you are asking for proof from PTM, which are not allowed on national media?
Army blamed PTM that PTM attacked Army checkpost, proof?????? where is proof????
1- No "my personal source" is not related to this accident, that is general thing, Army controls FC, all commissioned officers are on rotation within army and FC.
2- No, I haven't toned down on my stance, I still believe that army is using its power on media to hide their crime. I am not on any level in PTM, if I had any connection with PTM I would ask them to add a judicial inquiry into this accident. I consider army repeatedly blaming PTM for treason without any proof. PTM doesn't wants to malign LEAs therefore they never asked for what happened before operation zarb-e-azb, All PTM demands are related to events after zarb-e-azb was announced to be successfully completed.
3- it is the base of this accident.
enough laughing now answer my question, if someone asks for strict action against RAW's funded terrorist, you will consider him on the payroll of RAW or ISI?
"What PTM is doing" Chief of Army Staff acknowledged that PTM demands are legit, so no treason here.And what if I proved you with proofs that whatever PTM is doing and has done is treason then what?
PS: Unlike you I wont use my "sources"
"What PTM is doing" Chief of Army Staff acknowledged that PTM demands are legit, so no treason here.
Only treason could be if they get funding from RAW, prove it...
PCCC: I haven't quoted any source except from clarification that FC is also a part of Army, and I didn't presented "my source" as a proof, rather to explain the thing to you guys.
Yes we are in the middle of an ongoing existential war, imposed on us by a nation to whom we are biggest none nato allies, it doesn't implies that whatever Army says in its press release is true.We are in the middle of an ongoing existential war, thousands of Army men have laid down their lives for the sake of motherland in this hybrid multi-front war so far. You really think that army should (or can) provide proof before retaliating to every single attack on them? 5 injured soldiers are not a 'proof' enough for you?
yes PTM members denied any attack from their side, their story is "we were pushing through the check post to participate in a protest against arrest of some people, and suddenly we were under firing, no one in the protestors had weapons except for the bodygaurds provided by government to the MNA".As for media coverage, with the amount of international media coverage PTM receives (for whatever reasons), do you really believe that they can be censored? or any aggression against them can go unnoticed?
Nothing in this post is worth reply because I haven't asked anything in that specific post rather they are explanation to my questions asked earlier to which you didn't answered or you couldn't answered or you being a big head couldn't get it.Nothing in your post is worthy of a serious reply. You are just repeating the same nonsense over and over again.
Still waiting for you to provide proof that the Army carries out illegal activities in FATA.!!
Yes,Bhai don't run away from my question. Even TTP and Altaf Hussain had some legit demands. Lets not hide behind demands and all that
I have asked you a very simple question
What if I prove you with proofs that PTM is indeed an anti Pakistan organization then what? Will you accept your mistake and apologize here for supporting this anti state organization?
Yes,
Yes we are in the middle of an ongoing existential war, imposed on us by a nation to whom we are biggest none nato allies, it doesn't implies that whatever Army says in its press release is true.
yes PTM members denied any attack from their side, their story is "we were pushing through the check post to participate in a protest against arrest of some people, and suddenly we were under firing, no one in the protestors had weapons except for the bodygaurds provided by government to the MNA".
Now?
Read my post again, carefully. And try to respond to what I said
Thanks for consideration, I am in hurry too, had to get stuff for sehri.I would create a separate thread for you tomorrow. I am in a bit of a hurry for now.
Lets discuss treason of PTM in a separate thread made specially for you
PS: I request mods not to ban you. We don't get much PTM supporters on this forum anyways
"You really think that army should (or can) provide proof before retaliating to every single attack on them? 5 injured soldiers are not a 'proof' enough for you?"Read my post again, carefully. And try to respond to what I said