Army awaits decision based on merit, justice in Panama Leaks case: ISPR

[Finer]

PTI is power in KPK, is KPK run over by TTP now? is KPK now totally in Anarchy? Did the 50K people that died how many of them were during PTI tenure?

Because the main establishment made final call. PTI as federal government cannot be trusted with powers over the entire Pakistan including the main establishment which will result the military takeover guaranteed. It took power-sharing agreement with Nawaz Sharif for main establishment to get back on the game in regards to foreign policy of Pakistan.

PTI is big no no; truly anarchist, and anti-Pakistani judging by its past policy such as pro-TTP stances for years, its anarchism that cost the economy of Pakistan big time.

 

[Imad.Khan]

Because the main establishment made final call. PTI as federal government cannot be trusted with powers over the entire Pakistan including the main establishment which will result the military takeover guaranteed. It took power-sharing agreement with Nawaz Sharif for main establishment to get back on the game in regards to foreign policy of Pakistan.

PTI is big no no; truly anarchist, and anti-Pakistani judging by its past policy such as pro-TTP stances for years, its anarchism that cost the economy of Pakistan big time.

So you admit that NS only came to power through an agreement with the establishment.

 

[Finer]

So you admit that NS only came to power through an agreement with the establishment.

Power-sharing agreement happened in the year of 2014 which signifies the influence over foreign policy. After 2014, the main establishment has control over foreign policy now. As for election, PMLN has won the federal election by majority in votes which is not discussion in relevant to power-sharing agreement over foreign policy.

If Imran Khan is your source, then i can understand given one of representative of PTI made serious accusation against General Kiyani and Nawaz Sharif for some sort of deals which implies rigging the election based on reading between the lines.

 

[Imad.Khan]

Power-sharing agreement happened in the year of 2014 which signifies the influence over foreign policy. After 2014, the main establishment has control over foreign policy now. As for election, PMLN has won the federal election by majority in votes which is not discussion in relevant to power-sharing agreement over foreign policy.

If Imran Khan is your source, then i can understand given one of representative of PTI made serious accusation against General Kiyani and Nawaz Sharif for some sort of deals which implies rigging the election based on reading between the lines.

you just contradicted yourself, previously you said that the establishment wouldn't allow PTI to come into power because it can't be trusted but then you say that NS won via votes without establishments involvement and the power sharing agreement is limited to foreign policy.

So on one hand you say that the final call is from the establishment and then on the other side you say that establishment didn't have any hand on NS victory.

 

[Finer]

you just contradicted yourself, previously you said that the establishment wouldn't allow PTI to come into power because it can't be trusted but then you say that NS won via votes without establishments involvement and the power sharing agreement is limited to foreign policy.

So on one hand you say that the final call is from the establishment and then on the other side you say that establishment didn't have any hand on NS victory.

That is general assumption but given the history, so who knows. That doesn't change the fact PMLN won the votes by majority not the first time. When there was unfriendly between PMLN and the main establishment, the military takeover happened; twice in PMLN ruling within 1-2 years.

Given the Imran Khan's stances on TTP and their unpleasant exchange with the main establishment while power-sharing agreement got PMLN and General Raheel on the good notes which suggests possible scenario ahead of the election, but then, it is just assumption based on the factors as pointed above.

Because the main establishment made final call. PTI as federal government cannot be trusted with powers over the entire Pakistan including the main establishment which will result the military takeover guaranteed. It took power-sharing agreement with Nawaz Sharif for main establishment to get back on the game in regards to foreign policy of Pakistan.

As for bold, that was about the military operation; not powers over Pakistan just in case if you misunderstood. Once the military operation is announced, Imran Khan has no choice but to cooperate with Pakistan despite his pro-stances on TTP for years.

 

[Imad.Khan]

That is general assumption but given the history, so who knows. That doesn't change the fact PMLN won the votes by majority not the first time. When there was unfriendly between PMLN and the main establishment, the military takeover happened; twice in PMLN ruling within 1-2 years.

Given the Imran Khan's stances on TTP and their unpleasant exchange with the main establishment while power-sharing agreement got PMLN and General Raheel on the good notes which suggests possible scenario ahead of the election, but then, it is just assumption based on the factors as pointed above.

So now its an assumption. ok come back when you having anything concrete to discuss.

 

[Awan68]

That is general assumption but given the history, so who knows. That doesn't change the fact PMLN won the votes by majority not the first time. When there was unfriendly between PMLN and the main establishment, the military takeover happened; twice in PMLN ruling within 1-2 years.

Given the Imran Khan's stances on TTP and their unpleasant exchange with the main establishment while power-sharing agreement got PMLN and General Raheel on the good notes which suggests possible scenario ahead of the election, but then, it is just assumption based on the factors as pointed above.

Dont give the economy excuse, honourable nations never compromise on justice whatever the cost, that is why their flag stands tall among others, the protest was against corruption and do u even know what corruption does to the economy on the micro and macro level??, if protests against corruption lead to a fair pakistan than we bieng a nation of 200 million will rise swiftly to be among the most powerful nations on earth ,no question about it, now coming to the ttp part yes i have reservations against Ik on this issue , probably why i dont support him phycially i.e join his party, go to this dharnas protests etc, the fact of the matter is he sometimes leans towards narratives that make me highly suspicious of him, truth be told i dont really trust ik, i fear his stature as bieng the only publicly popular leader after bhutto, he's a big gamble, what if he comes to power and is really an emissary of the dark forces that be, the army wont be able to control him, not this popular a leader, the doubts are there but that doesnt mean if u have doubts about Ik than u have to supprt nawaz n zardari, dont suport anyone...

 

[Finer]

So now its an assumption. ok come back when you having anything concrete to discuss.

That depends. If the main establishment made final call, that would be to point about the military operation being legalized once and for all. So no question about it.

Because the main establishment made final call. PTI as federal government cannot be trusted with powers over the entire Pakistan including the main establishment which will result the military takeover guaranteed. It took power-sharing agreement with Nawaz Sharif for main establishment to get back on the game in regards to foreign policy of Pakistan.

As for bold, that was about the military operation; not powers over Pakistan just in case if you misunderstood. Once the military operation is announced, Imran Khan has no choice but to cooperate with Pakistan despite his pro-stances on TTP for years.

Dont give the economy excuse, honourable nations never compromise on justice whatever the cost, that is why their flag stands tall among others, the protest was against corruption and do u even know what corruption does to the economy on the micro and macro level??, if protests against corruption lead to a fair pakistan than we bieng a nation of 200 million will rise swiftly to be among the most powerful nations on earth ,no question about it, now coming to the ttp part yes i have reservations against Ik on this issue , probably why i dont support him phycially i.e join his party, go to this dharnas protests etc, the fact of the matter is he sometimes leans towards narratives that make me highly suspicious of him, truth be told i dont really trust ik, i fear his stature as bieng the only publicly popular leader after bhutto, he's a big gamble, what if he comes to power and is really an emissary of the dark forces that be, the army wont be able to control him, not this popular a leader, the doubts are there but that doesnt mean if u have doubts about Ik than u have to supprt nawaz n zardari, dont suport anyone...

I don't know what points you are trying to make, but it is really hard to read your posts. But i am gonna give you short version that in case if that answer your confusion.

Economy is everything. Because of economy, poverty decreases and laws/order improves. Funds are added to improve common people lives.

PTI stances on TTP including its anarchism cost Pakistan's economy big time. It is hard to trust Imran Khan after what he tried to do to the economy of Pakistan that is keeping Pakistan above the water.

 

[Awan68]

That depends. If the main establishment made final call, that would be to point about the military operation being legalized once and for all. So no question about it.

Because the main establishment made final call. PTI as federal government cannot be trusted with powers over the entire Pakistan including the main establishment which will result the military takeover guaranteed. It took power-sharing agreement with Nawaz Sharif for main establishment to get back on the game in regards to foreign policy of Pakistan.

As for bold, that was about the military operation; not powers over Pakistan just in case if you misunderstood. Once the military operation is announced, Imran Khan has no choice but to cooperate with Pakistan despite his pro-stances on TTP for years.



I don't know what points you are trying to make, but it is really hard to read your posts. But i am gonna give you short version that in case if that answer your confusion.

Economy is everything. Because of economy, poverty decreases and laws/order improves. Funds are added to improve common people lives.

PTI stances on TTP including its anarchism cost Pakistan's economy big time. It is hard to trust Imran Khan after what he tried to do to the economy of Pakistan that is keeping Pakistan above the water.

ik only came into the political arena recently, who was dragging pakistans economy down before him??? wake up? Dont just talk to appease ur ego make valid arguments make sense man, the only thing holding back pak economy is corruption, the only thing that has ever held pak economy back has been corruption n disregard of meritt, every honourable nation rises up to corruption, this is what happens in western countries. A slight knowledge of corruption by a leader andmillions march on their roads demanding resignation, why are their economies so robust than??, this is the first time it has happened in pak, that people rose to corruption and all credit goes to ik, u and people of ur mindset are the product of a long legacy of the "kam chalao" mindset in pak, it will take time to convince u of the virtues of accountability of the ruling elite because slaves grow fond of their shackles and it is difficult to make them part with them, the basic principles of the state of medina established by prophet(pbuh) was the accountability of the ruling elite, hazrat umar(ra) main focus was on this subject during his rule and didnt u see muslims establish the longest standing most powerful empire and pinacle of justice the world has ever seen, nazaiya e zaroorat destroys nations, because in reality its always zarooriat of a few that trancends the many but they like to cloak it as such as the entire nations needs it, justice is what is important, cold brutal uncompromising justice, compromises establish short trem benefits and long term suffering while brutal uncompromising justice leads to long term elevation that endures, if the french had thought of their economy and cancelled the french revolution would they be one of the richest most developed nations on earth now?? The only way forward for pakistan is end of dynastic politics and corruption or else ten pak armys let alone one would not be able to save this country from division and annihilation....

 

[Finer]

@Awan68

Unless you fix the structure of your essay to make it readable post, it is headache just by scrolling. No offense.

 

[Awan68]

@Awan68

Unless you fix the structure of your essay to make it readable post, it is headache just by scrolling. No offense.

U sound like an english teacher i used to have long long ago, she was sxy n fat, is that u missy?

 

[Malik Usman]

Nawaz Sharif is best politician Pakistan has. He is past, he is present and he is the future. Why everyone thinks that things would change? for what? The country is doing so well that we see huge lines outside Pakistani embassies in US and Europe, people dying to get work visa or residence.

Politicians are worshiped by their thug group of people, don't expect any change!

Pakistan is progressing only in one thing....Roads, Bridges, Loans and Final one is CPEC..........
Rest of other things including...
1- Health
2- Security (Ok some how gave them credit although is entirely military's plan).
3- Education
4- Job Opportunities
5- Justice (In Courts, Police and All other Govt. Departments)
6 -Agriculture (Don't forget Pakistan is an Agricultural Country)
7- Industries......
and many more...........all those things don't count ?????

 

[PakSword]

Unless you fix the structure of your essay to make it readable post, it is headache just by scrolling. No offense.

U sound like an english teacher i used to have long long ago, she was sxy n fat, is that u missy?

 

[Finer]

U sound like an english teacher i used to have long long ago, she was sxy n fat, is that u missy?

Instead of lusting your favorite teacher, perhaps you should have paid attention to the English lecture. That would have come handy for you right now since your posts that screams like 5 years old crying kid. No offense.

 

[Awan68]

Instead of lusting your favorite teacher, perhaps you should have paid attention to the English lecture. That would have come handy for you right now since your posts that screams like 5 years old crying kid. No offense.

Keep exposing ur maturity level, im loving it