What's new

“Argo, Fcuk Yourself”

It wasn't shot in India, it was shot in Sri Lanka :D

And Om Puri didn't work in it. It was Amrish Puri. :D

As for Indian Actors, Argo also has Iranian actors working in it. :D

Yeap..It was shot in Lanka and almost the whole support cast were Lankan..:D

I think Argo was based on true events but does not mean it's wholly accurate..It's hollywood after all..To make it a box office hit you need a certain element of biasness to it..However unfair it is
 
Hollywood is a Jewish movie industry, so what do you expect from it?

.

That my friend is something most posters here failed to mention..:tup:

Any movie even minutely critical of zionism or Israel will never get in ten miles of Hollywood..Anti semitism and Genocide are the most overused words in history these days
 
They do, but Indians do not go beyond all lengths to protest against such things. If you were an avid movie watcher, you would see extreme bias for/against India in almost all the Hollywood movies. Especially when they portray Indians as a turban wearing half naked population living in the medieval times.

You won't see such vociferous protests coming out of everywhere in India. There was this big grosser Armageddon - it showed all the Indians wearing turban and praying in front of Taj Mahal - What sense does it make? None. Was it offensive? Yes. Were there protests? No.

There was Blade - a movie on vampires, where one of the vampires had "Srimad Bhagavat Gita" (Holy book of Hindus) written in Devnagari on his forehead. But were there any protests? No, none.

And then in almost all Indian movies (Bollywood, and Tamil as well) that had any white characters in them, showed the white people as stupid and promiscuous to offensive degrees...

You should think of such movies as some sort of "yes man" wanting to extract money by playing with the biases of the targeted mass.

Indians do not protest because they are so happy to be included even in a single frame of a Hollywood movie. They couldn't care less how Hollywood portrays them, as long as they are portrayed they are ok with it.
 
Indians do not protest because they are so happy to be included even in a single frame of a Hollywood movie. They couldn't care less how Hollywood portrays them, as long as they are portrayed they are ok with it.

Think again dingbat......

WSJ_Pakistan_AD_scan-584x597.jpg


Can any other country do so ?
Only pakistan_
:rofl: :rofl:


We're not the ones walking around with a bowl begging for approval.
 
Think again dingbat......

WSJ_Pakistan_AD_scan-584x597.jpg


Can any other country do so ?
Only pakistan_
:rofl: :rofl:


We're not the ones walking around with a bowl begging for approval.

What are you smoking there, *** turd? Or are you dreaming of being in a spectator crowd of a Hollywood movie?

wearing a turban, displaying a dark boney shirtless torso, while standing in front of Taj Mahal and cheering American astronauts who thwarted an asteroid threat.

Yeah, that's you.
 
Reports: Iran Plans Suing Hollywood Over 'Argo'


Iran is planning to sue Hollywood over the Oscar-winning "Argo" because of the movie's allegedly "unrealistic portrayal" of the country, Iranian media reported Tuesday.

Several news outlets, including the pro-reform Shargh daily, said French lawyer Isabelle Coutant-Peyre is in Iran for talks with officials over how and where to file the lawsuit. She is also the lawyer for notorious Venezuelan-born terrorist Ilich Ramirez Sanchez, known as Carlos the Jackal.

Following the 1979 attack on the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days, but six embassy staffers were sheltered by the Canadian ambassador. Their escape, using a fake movie as a cover story, is recounted in "Argo."

After its Oscar win in February, Iranian officials dismissed "Argo" as pro-CIA, anti-Iran propaganda.

The lawyer told the semi-official Mehr news agency that she will start a campaign to show that Argo is a lie, while pressing to stop distribution of the movie.

"We will be able to block distributors of the movie, force them to apologize and challenge them to confess that the movie is nothing but a sheer lie," the lawyer said.

Though the movie isn't showing in any Iranian theaters, many Iranians have seen it on bootleg DVDs and it set off a spirited debate that exposed a generational divide. Iranians who took part in the 1979 Islamic Revolution picked apart the portrayals of Tehran at the time but those too young to recall the events were eager for a different view on what had happened.

The decision on the lawsuit came after a group of Iranian cultural officials and movie critics screened the film in a closed audience in a Tehran theater late Monday.

The gathering, titled "The Hoax of Hollywood," discussed various legal aspects of filing a lawsuit, media reports said, without providing details. It remains unclear what specific charges Iran could raise and what court Tehran could turn to if the action goes ahead.

Those at the meeting dismissed "Argo" as a "violation of international cultural norms." A statement issued after the gathering said that "awarding an anti-Iran movie is a propaganda attack against our nation and entire humanity."

The statement did not clarify how the movie was allegedly unrealistic, but officials have accused "Argo" of depicting Iranians as "too violent."

They have also said the movie's director did not refer to other documentaries on the embassy storming or discuss reasons for the crisis, which included simmering resentment against the United States for a CIA-aided counter-coup in 1953 that toppled democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh and restored the pro-Western monarchy in Iran.

This was not the first time Iran has claimed that Hollywood has pushed a distorted picture of the country.

In 2009, Iran demanded an apology from a team of visiting Hollywood actors and movie industry officials, including Annette Bening, saying films such as "300" and "The Wrestler" were "insulting" to Iranians.

In 2007, the hit American movie "300" angered Iranians who said the Greeks-versus-Persians action flick insults their ancient culture and provokes animosity against Iran.

The 1991 film "Not Without My Daughter" — the true story of an American women fleeing Iran with her young daughter, angered Iranians who accused it of casting Iranians as dirty, boorish and cruel, obsessed with Islam and misogynist attitudes toward women.

Iran's state-run film industry boycotted this year's Oscars in the wake of an Internet video clip made in the U.S. denigrating the Prophet Muhammad that set off protests across the Muslim world.

The affair wasn't related to "Argo."

Reports: Iran Plans Suing Hollywood Over 'Argo' - ABC News

:rofl:
 
On that note, Pakistan should sue India's Bollywood for filming thousands of movies spreading propaganda
 
Back
Top Bottom