What's new

Are You Ready for Nuclear War?

nangyale

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
The First Strike Game
Are You Ready for Nuclear War?
by PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
Pay close attention to Steven Starr’s guest column, “The Lethality of Nuclear Weapons.” Washington thinks nuclear war can be won and is planning for a first strike on Russia, and perhaps China, in order to prevent any challenge to Washington’s world hegemony.

The plan is far advanced, and the implementation of the plan is underway. As I have reported previously, US strategic doctrine was changed and the role of nuclear missiles was elevated from a retaliatory role to an offensive first strike role. US anti-ballistic missile (ABM) bases have been established in Poland on Russia’s frontier, and other bases are planned. When completed Russia will be ringed with US missile bases.

Anti-ballistic missiles, known as “star wars,” are weapons designed to intercept and destroy ICBMs. In Washington’s war doctrine, the US hits Russia with a first strike, and whatever retaliatory force Russia might have remaining is prevented from reaching the US by the shield of ABMs.

The reason Washington gave for the change in war doctrine is the possibility that terrorists might obtain a nuclear weapon with which to destroy an American city. This explanation is nonsensical. Terrorists are individuals or a group of individuals, not a country with a threatening military. To use nuclear weapons against terrorists would destroy far more than the terrorists and be pointless as a drone with a conventional missile would suffice.

The reason Washington gave for the ABM base in Poland is to protect Europe from Iranian ICBMs. Washington and every European government knows that Iran has no ICBMs and that Iran has not indicated any intent to attack Europe.

No government believes Washington’s reasons. Every government realizes that Washington’s reasons are feeble attempts to hide the fact that it is creating the capability on the ground to win a nuclear war.

The Russian government understands that the change in US war doctrine and the US ABM bases on its borders are directed at Russia and are indications that Washington plans a first strike with nuclear weapons on Russia.

China has also understood that Washington has similar intentions toward China. As I reported several months ago, in response to Washington’s threat China called the world’s attention to China’s ability to destroy the US should Washington initiate such a conflict.

However, Washington believes that it can win a nuclear war with little or no damage to the US. This belief makes nuclear war likely.

As Steven Starr makes clear, this belief is based in ignorance. Nuclear war has no winner. Even if US cities were saved from retaliation by ABMs, the radiation and nuclear winter effects of the weapons that hit Russia and China would destroy the US as well.

The media, conveniently concentrated into a few hands during the corrupt Clinton regime, is complicit by ignoring the issue. The governments of Washington’s vassal states in Western and Eastern Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan are also complicit, because they accept Washington’s plan and provide the bases for implementing it. The demented Polish government has probably signed the death warrant for humanity.

The US Congress is complicit, because no hearings are held about the executive branch’s plans for initiating nuclear war.

Washington has created a dangerous situation. As Russia and China are clearly threatened with a first strike, they might decide to strike first themselves. Why should Russia and China sit and await the inevitable while their adversary creates the ability to protect itself by developing its ABM shield? Once Washington completes the shield, Russia and China are certain to be attacked, unless they surrender in advance.

The 10 minute report below from Russia Today makes it clear that Washington’s secret plan for a first strike on Russia is not secret. The report also makes it clear that Washington is prepared to eliminate any European leaders who do not align with Washington. A transcript is provided by Global Research.

Readers will ask me, “What can we do?” This is what you can do. You can shut down the Ministry of Propaganda by turning off Fox News, CNN, the BBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, by ceasing to read the New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times. Simply exit the official media. Do not believe one word that the government says. Do not vote. Realize that evil is concentrated in Washington. In the 21st century Washington has destroyed in whole or part seven countries. Millions of peoples murdered, maimed, displaced, and Washington has shown no remorse whatsoever. Neither have the “christian” churches. The devastation that Washington has inflicted is portrayed as a great success. Washington prevailed.

Washington is determined to prevail, and the evil that Washington represents is leading the world to destruction.

Paul Craig Roberts is a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. Roberts’ How the Economy Was Lost is now available from CounterPunch in electronic format. His latest book is How America Was Lost.
 
off that first link
"He has repeatedly warned that a US-Russian nuclear war would wipe out the human race, along with all other complex forms of life. As a scientist with expert knowledge, I wish to echo and explain his warning."


Wow they thought that up all on their own...I guess they have been living in a cave and not watching all the apocalyptic movies Hollywood has put out in the last 60 years about what nuclear weapons can do.

planet-of-the-apes-statue-of-liberty.jpg
 
Last edited:
What a load of crap.

Both Russia and China have limited defences against ICBMs already and are investing heavily in more credible ABM defences.

Besides, China is working on HGV which cannot be intercepted by any current known technology.
 
America has been pushing the boundaries of MAD with their expanding ABM network. That is a very dangerous game of nuclear brinkmanship.

However the new HGV technology being tested by China/Russia/America is designed to defeat any conventional method of interception.

Which will bring MAD back to a safe balance.

But no doubt America will try to break down MAD again, by trying to find a way to defeat HGV.
 
America has been pushing the boundaries of MAD with their expanding ABM network. That is a very dangerous game of nuclear brinkmanship.

However the new HGV technology being tested by China/Russia/America is designed to defeat any conventional method of interception.

Which will bring MAD back to a safe balance.

But no doubt America will try to break down MAD again, by trying to find a way to defeat HGV.

The US doesn't have a monopoly on ABM stuff you know.
Anti-ballistic missile - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

or do you mean ICBM stuff?
 
I didn't say ABM technology, I said "ABM network".

As in the expanding missile shield that is pushing into Russia's sphere of influence, and pissing off the Russians?

Considering Europe (NATO) doesn't have any real ABM stuff while the US, Russia, and China do...doesn't that sound a wee bit like a gap? Any ICBM Russia launches at the US is going to be far from any European interceptors.
 
Considering Europe (NATO) doesn't have any real ABM stuff while the US, Russia, and China do...doesn't that sound a wee bit like a gap? Any ICBM Russia launches at the US is going to be far from any European interceptors.

Nevertheless, the impression is that America is trying to surround Russia with their ABM network.

And such an erosion of MAD can only be rectified with Russia building more nukes, and more HGV platforms to carry those nukes.

It just increases instability all around, with more room for miscalculation.

The whole point of MAD is that the world is safe from nuclear apocalypse, because no one can make a First Strike without being taken out too.
 
Nevertheless, the impression is that America is trying to surround Russia with their ABM network.

And such an erosion of MAD can only be rectified with Russia building more nukes, and more HGV platforms to carry those nukes.

It just increases instability all around, with more room for miscalculation.

The whole point of MAD is that the world is safe from nuclear apocalypse, because no one can make a First Strike without being taken out too.

There's zero chance of any ABM system stopping an attack by a saturation barrage of nuclear weapons. It is only useful for a small scale attack by a rogue state or rogue military unit with a crude missile.
 
There's zero chance of any ABM system stopping an attack by a saturation barrage of nuclear weapons. It is only useful for a small scale attack by a rogue state or rogue military unit with a crude missile.

By a full barrage yes, but that would only occur at the end-stage of a nuclear war.

In the early stages, nuclear escalation will usually take the form of a few counter-force attacks (i.e. against the enemy's nuclear weapons silos, not against cities).

It is clear that America's expanding ABM network is eroding MAD, and more importantly, Russia and China believe it is so.

What would you do if you were in our shoes? Just sit back and watch our nuclear deterrent being eroded? The only real option for us is to increase our arsenals, and increase our induction of HGV platforms or similar.
 
An all out thermonuclear war bet the US and Russia means Destruction, Drought, Famine & epidemics throughout the world
 
The Americans are certainly not ready,for they will be the biggest losers in a nuclear exchange。

Destroy this world and we can all start anew。

Level the playing field。

blah,blah。。。:D
 
Back
Top Bottom