Then you must despise the Qatar/India/Egypt methodology.
LOL.
India settled on a formula that will lead to indigenization. Basically, leverage a big-ticket purchase to pressure the supplier into transferring technology, production work, etc. India's large economy and geo-political position helps too, but their goal is to develop what they can't get overseas, buy ToT where possible, and combine. So, the Dhruv, LCH, Tejas, Tejas Mk2, etc, are all examples of this approach, and it seems to be working.
Egypt's focus is to localize as much of the defence expenditure as possible (so as to support employment and help out domestic vested interests). So, for Egypt, the key is probably to see as much of that money spent locally, and other metrics (max number of people employed, max areas with plants, etc).
Qatar just wants to dabble in the business and ROI side of this stuff. So it's more open to investing in emerging def companies (like in Turkey), not too concerned where that tech is or who's making it.
Since we're on a roll, Pakistan is basically split based on the service arm (and its realities). So, as the Army and Navy can get what they want off-the-shelf, they're mostly happy with buying from 1-2 suppliers and trying to get the best deals possible. But since the PAF is blocked which ever way it looks, or can't find the solution it wants on the market, it wants to indigenize.
I think even 4 units are more than enough for Bangladesh
