What's new

Any threat to Pakistan’s integrity is unacceptable: Saudi King assures COAS

Last time I checked it was the King begging for help to save his ***** from poor Yemeni peasants.
when he begging bro
We are their friend and KSA is more important than Iran
It is time for all those person stop fucking their mouths against KSA and in favor of Iran or Yemen

KSA is our most important allie. All pro Iran people of Pakistan should understand it that we will not compromise our great relation at any cost.
KSA did to much for us everyone know it. And KSA will do to much in favor of Pakistan.
Iran just betrayed us like A.Q Khan case
 
.
Every country does business with other countries at its own disposal.Heck even China-India trade is near $70 Billion.Moreover as Pakistan`s economy is far lower than the Indian one thats why you see the lower number on pak-saudi trade.So this post of yours makes no sense.

This isn't about India or who is or isn't doing trade with them. Pakistan isn't doing trade with Israel because of Arabs, yet Arabs themselves trade with India why is that? Point is simple we should have relations and trade with every body and our foreign policy should represent that.
 
. .
when he begging bro
We are their friend and KSA is more important than Iran
It is time for all those person stop fucking their mouths against KSA and in favor of Iran or Yemen

KSA is our most important allie. All pro Iran people of Pakistan should understand it that we will not compromise our great relation at any cost.
KSA did to much for us everyone know it. And KSA will do to much in favor of Pakistan.
Iran just betrayed us like A.Q Khan case

Same line like a parrot repeated by Madrassah educated House of Saud lovers.

Instead of showing us your intellectual level by swearing, why don't you try to convince us why Saudi is better, then Iran or Yemen or China.

What did KSA do for you? Other than financing the terrorist.

Einstein, Mumar Gaddafi was Libyan not Iranian, it was Libyan airliner that landed in Washington full of information about the nukes not Iranian.

gaddafi_400x400.jpg






And who is this, we, I don't support your claim, nor I stand behind this notion that we support KSA blindly.
 
.
This isn't about India or who is or isn't doing trade with them. Pakistan isn't doing trade with Israel because of Arabs, yet Arabs themselves trade with India why is that? Point is simple we should have relations and trade with every body and our foreign policy should represent that.
First of all,the reason of not recognising israel is not related to arabs rather its due to our own mindset of Ummah.
Secondly,Whether KSA does trade with INdia or not,Its none of our concern.Its their internal matter,same as they have no concern as with whom we do trade. But we will have concerns when KSA does a defence pact with INdians.Briefly saying,We should only be concerned if a friendly country deepens its relations relating to defence n security with our enemies.
 
.
First of all,the reason of not recognizing Israel is not related to Arabs rather its due to our own mindset of Ummah.
Secondly,Whether KSA does trade with India or not,Its none of our concern.Its their internal matter,same as they have no concern as with whom we do trade. But we will have concerns when KSA does a defense pact with Indians.Briefly saying,We should only be concerned if a friendly country deepens its relations relating to defense n security with our enemies.

Oh, so we don't recognize Israel because of Ummah, is this the same Ummah that has diplomatic and trade relations with Israel. Besides who died and left Pakistanies in-charge of Ummah.

UAE= supporting BLA and others to disrupt economic activity in Balochistan.

SaudiArabia, Kuwait and other GCC nations financing Terrorist in Pakistan.

Afghanistan= allowing Indians to use its soil to train and attack Pakistan.

Kuwait = stop issuing visa to Pakistanis.

Please tell me which part of this makes you want to support Ummah for.
 
.
In Sinhala and Malayalam, Ummah means kiss.
 
.
Chief is part of the same government? now thats hilarious ! please don't insult the Chief by calling him part of this filth.

Defence policies are pushed by Chief, in Pakistan yes. When you have impotent corrupt PM and minsters.

What 'non defence stuff' has been handled by this PM? don't say Metro !

May be in UK the army generals are NOT part of the UK gov.

In Pakistan we do.

Qibla,

Here is a prediction.

Come March / April I see something big happening.

It won't be Yemen, and this time Pakistan will be a part of it.

Isharon kinyon main baat hai.

So hum chup rahay, Hum huns diyay

Manzoor tha parda tera.

:-)
 
. .
Diplomatic support. Gets you vote in UN. Pakistan gets elected as member to important UN committees and councils. KSA is most influential GCC country. Due to KSA, Pakistan gets 20+ votes each time. Pakistani diplomats are smart and intelligent. They speak good English and communicate well with world powers. KSA knows that skill of ours and wants our diplomats to remain active in world bodies. In return our diplomats support Saudi view point and protect their interests.

Not every time it is about money or defence equipment. There is a lot which goes on and we have much to support to give in return, other than soldiers.

I dont disagree with what you said above however i was making another point which was purely on strategic basis. On diplomatic front i would argue that GCC countries have not supported much other than lip service on issues such as Kashmir. I mean we do hear OIC talking about Kashmir but when it comes to taking concrete again, these countries fall well short. Like labour for e.g or selling oil to India. Sanctioning India on these two accounts alone can add a significant stress on Indian economy and perhaps they would be more incline to talk on Kashmir rather than dismissing it altogether like the case now.
 
.
This isn't about India or who is or isn't doing trade with them. Pakistan isn't doing trade with Israel because of Arabs, yet Arabs themselves trade with India why is that? Point is simple we should have relations and trade with every body and our foreign policy should represent that.

Who told you Pakistan is not doing trade with Israel because of Arabs???
 
.
Last edited:
.
Please tell me which part of this makes you want to support Ummah for.[/QUOTE]




Oh, so we don't recognize Israel because of Ummah, is this the same Ummah that has diplomatic and trade relations with Israel. Besides who died and left Pakistanies in-charge of Ummah.

UAE= supporting BLA and others to disrupt economic activity in Balochistan.

SaudiArabia, Kuwait and other GCC nations financing Terrorist in Pakistan.

Afghanistan= allowing Indians to use its soil to train and attack Pakistan.

Kuwait = stop issuing visa to Pakistanis.

Please tell me which part of this makes you want to support Ummah for.
Oh, so we don't recognize Israel because of Ummah, is this the same Ummah that has diplomatic and trade relations with Israel. Besides who died and left Pakistanies in-charge of Ummah.

UAE= supporting BLA and others to disrupt economic activity in Balochistan.
Iran building Chabahar with Indian funding to counter Gwadar in Pakistan.

SaudiArabia, Kuwait and other GCC nations financing Terrorist in Pakistan.
Iran supporting, funding and indoctrinating sectarian terrorist in Pakistan. Shelling our borders and threatening to invade Pakistan.

Afghanistan= allowing Indians to use its soil to train and attack Pakistan.
Iran with India supported funded and trained Anti-Pakistan factions of North Alliance for whole decade to fight against Pakistani proxies.

Kuwait = stop issuing visa to Pakistanis.
I guess rest of the world gives Pakistanis free entry.


Please tell me which part of this makes you want to support Ummah for.
I know which part do you support: Hezbollah , Assad the butcher of Syria and the evil regime of Khomeini.
 
.
I dont disagree with what you said above however i was making another point which was purely on strategic basis. On diplomatic front i would argue that GCC countries have not supported much other than lip service on issues such as Kashmir. I mean we do hear OIC talking about Kashmir but when it comes to taking concrete again, these countries fall well short. Like labour for e.g or selling oil to India. Sanctioning India on these two accounts alone can add a significant stress on Indian economy and perhaps they would be more incline to talk on Kashmir rather than dismissing it altogether like the case now.

Please do not mix economic policies with diplomatic ones. All nations are free to exploit economic resources and trade as they wish. This is how it should be and neither we can object not they can raise an objection. As far labor, well ratio is still higher in favor of Pakistan especially in KSA. There are some specific privileges extended to Pakistanis which are not given to India or other countries. For example Pakistani women do not work as house maids. Indian military officials do not serve in their militaries while Pakistanis do. Despite Indian attempts they have been denied.

As far diplomatic front, you need to go back in UN history and you will see Arab league and GCC now have been supporting Pakistan constantly on Kashmir and other issues. There can not be a blanket support at world stage. You give some you receive some. Two factors went against Pakistan here. Internal weakness due to poor leadership and inconsistent policies. And second indigenous Kashmiris did not voice their rights as loudly as they should have. You can not raise an issue if Kashmiris of IOK are not as vocally protesting. Nevertheless, history will show you that Turkey+GCC nations is all that we have got to support us on Kashmir.

Problem lies in our own weaknesses. A weak country can not return favors and hence can not receive unconditional support. By late 70s and 80s, Pakistan was seen as leading Muslim country in scientific achievement, modernity and military training. Muslims around the world, especially Arab nations were in awe of our educational standards, scientific achievements and military training. At that time Pakistan was the best Muslim world could present so they happily supported us and our programs. What happened afterwards? We lost our way and became increasingly weaker. World doesn't wait for you, they moved on. Whatever support you see today is remnant of those days. Today Pakistan can only offer its military expertise. It isn't healthy to complain for the sake of it. For some reason we as a nation have a false sense of entitlement. We want everyone to just serve us with goodies while we are not bound to offer anything in return. World doesn't work that way. Respect has to be earned not demanded.
 
.
Ironically, when each of the countries were attacked in the past. No partners came to each others aid.
Hi,

One should learn history before commenting on such posts.
1969 houthi rebel bombing in Arabia by Pakistanis
1979 grand mosque seizure
2009 operation scorched earth
Countless unquoted joint operation apart from training programs and volunteers.

From Arabia :

Free oil during sanctions
Supported diplomatically

So, please don't comment on stuff you don't have knowledge of
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom