Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Projection is more often than not subconscious. The guilty party generally goes out of his way to not see it, even when confronted. Especially when confronted.What projection are you talking about?
Hmm. But you'll still have to pardon my lingering suspicion as to your real motives. LOL.Yes, and I specifically wrote “Viet and buddy” in the singular, not plural. I was specifically referring to the member @Viet and another guy, he knows who he is.
He should not be using the terms "Han" or even "Chinese", that's for sure. I've only skimmed the paper he's citing, not enough to fully process his argument.And can you do me a favor and explain to @Viet that the article he is referring to is talking about the Austronesian migration and it doesnt support his wishful thinking that it was talkimg about Han Chinese from Taiwan migrating to VN 5000 years ago.
Could also mean he's of Chinese ancestry. Ming loyalists soldiers and their families pacified and settled in what is now southern Vietnam, more or less, on behalf of the Vietnamese emperor long before it was annexed by Vietnam.He is a southern Vietnamese, so the funny thing is that chances are, he could be carrying some Khmer genes.
Finally someone with better analysis than the two brain locked Viet and Yoro. The parent gene cant be destroyed or enslaved by children gene. That means vietnamese cant be destroyed or enslaved by those East Asian children. To this date Vietnamese is the only Asian defeat western supremacy, french empire, U.S. Despite its a small country While none of those NEA can do the same. Certainly, parents gene cant be subdue.Projection.
Don't kid yourself.
A few Vietnamese do this but most don't. Far more common is Chinese netizens wanting to be associated with Koreans and Japanese, due to their profound insecurities w.r.t. whites. Much more common still is Southern Han wanting to be Northern Han, i.e. wanting to be FULL NEA (Northeast Asian), which is ridiculous, since even Korean and Japanese are at least 25% SEA. Someone here on on this forum deleted an entire thread because I posted stuff like this. Naturally, I'll post it again. It is germane to the present debate(s).
Below,
1. NEA = Northeast Asian, SEA = Southeast Asian.
2. In the quote below, Chinese are not separated between Northern and Southern Han, as they should be. Geneticist delineate between Northern and Southern Han based on genetic distances. Southern Han like Vietnamese have SEA maternal ancestry, via numerous mtDNA studies going back 25 years.
3. Koreans are not given in this particular data set.
(Note: Forum rules won't allow new members to post links.)
When I found out that Vietnamese were 57% NEA, I was shocked and quite disappointed. I never saw myself as Chinese. Heck, growing up in the US, I see myself as Asian American or Vietnamese American. I enjoy only western movies (Fellini's 8 1/2, Citizen Kane, Inception, Mad Max Fury Road), music (Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Floyd, Nat King Cole), literature (Homer, Beowulf, Shakespeare, Joyce) and art (Monet, Van Gogh, Degas...)... Nothing Chinese here. (The only thing Chinese I've ever coveted is dim sum and Bruce Lee. Let me tell you, when I was about 10 years old and found out Bruce Lee was not Vietnamese, I was devasted. Still am to this day, LOL.)
I had previously thought at most, Vietnamese were 10% NEA, i.e. from mixing with Chinese immigrants during the Han era of domination.
And mind you, we don't know exactly when and where this 57% NEA came from, it's certainly not all Han, or more generally Chinese (i.e. pre-Han era domination of Vietnam during the first millenium). Recent mtDNA and morphological (skeletal) studies suggest at least some (e.g. M7a), if not most of it, came into Northern Vietnam about 4000 years ago, and modern Chinese do NOT have some of the same genetic markers (M7a, etc.) from this ancient source, while others (D4) is common in both modern Northern Chinese and modern Japanese but not modern Southern Chinese. This could mean proto-Vietnamese are the parents of modern Chinese and Japanese, quite the opposite of what you are trying to project onto Vietnamese generally (genetically), and the motives of Vietnames netizens in particular. Indeed, many geneticists have for decades believed the peopling of both NE Asia and SE Asia came thru Northern Vietnam, vis-a-vis studies on certain key mtDNA and Y-DNA markers.
Note: Most of the geneticists I'm directly (but non explicitly) citing are not Vietnamese, indeed, many are Chinese.
Southern Han are deathly afraid of stuff like this, and throw a fit when it is mentioned. Note, Razib Khan is not Vietnamese.
Projection is more often than not subconscious. The guilty party generally goes out of his way to not see it, even when confronted. Especially when confronted.
Hmm. But you'll still have to pardon my lingering suspicion as to your real motives. LOL.
He should not be using the terms "Han" or even "Chinese", that's for sure. I've only skimmed the paper he's citing, not enough to fully process his argument.
Could also mean he's of Chinese ancestry. Ming loyalists soldiers and their families pacified and settled in what is now southern Vietnam, more or less, on behalf of the Vietnamese emperor long before it was annexed by Vietnam.
Or, he is Kinh.
ha ha ha..why not calling @Hu Songshan and @Deino ? they are mods of this section.
ha ha ha..why not calling @Hu Songshan and @Deino ? they are mods of this section.
you forget it is you who insults Vietnam and our people, too, by falsely saying "Viet kinh people civilization is evolved in and around Delta Mekong civilization, in the same manner with Khmer and Thais".
Red River Delta is in Northern Vietnam. Mekong River Delta is in Southern Vietnam. Central Vietnam was annexed from the Chams about 500 years ago. Southern Vietnam was annexed from the Khmers after that.Viet kinh people civilization is evolved in and around Delta Mekong civilization, in the same manner with Khmer and Thais
@Rechoice
VN 0-1 TL now, who u think will win?
Stop being so childish and answer my question, where did the article said that the people that migrated from Taiwan to VN/SEA 5000 years ago were Han Chinese? If you were wrong then just admit it and move on.
Frankly, I did think you were Chinese. Your tone with/against forum member Viet seemed remarkably like a Chinese nationalist.So what projection were you referring to?
I wasn’t referring to “Viets” or “Vietnamese” in general but specifically wrote “Viet and his buddy”, meaning I was referring to an individual (or 2). Yet you replied to me as though I was generalising the whole Viet population so seems like you were the one that was projecting against me.
Anyway, I’m wondering why you wrote that post and pasted those Videos about the China hiring white guy thing? I hope you werent projecting that I am Chinese and that I would somehow get offended by that. I am a Viet.
Or he could have Cham genes, it doesnt matter. Just the fact that there is a chance that he could be carrying some Khmer genes would make him uncomfortable.
Thai will win.
Up to now we don't have a true training center in Vietnam for our kids. Very sad.
Frankly, I did think you were Chinese. Your tone with/against forum member Viet seemed remarkably like a Chinese nationalist.
You are Vietnamese, but "Yorozuya" is Japanese. Pardon me, if I still harbor suspicions.
A du!! bon thai no cho an them 3 chai nua roi. Bay gio cho ong Miura ve la vua.
JMG-HAGL training centers are good, they use real foreign professional trainers. All the old PVF, Viettel, SLNA just use ex-players thats why it haven’t been good.
the people of champa came from borneo. is it new for you?
Taiwanese Aborigine
View attachment 264164
(Austronesian people)
I dont know why @Viet keep asking help from the mod when he needs to deal with Yorozuya intelectually....
i am always wondered, physically Vietnamese have a lot similarities with Dayak people in Borneo
Reason for the thread is gone because it makes Chinese look bad regardless there is truth in it. It is very common in this forum which known for Pro Chinese.Frankly, I did think you were Chinese. Your tone with/against forum member Viet seemed remarkably like a Chinese nationalist.
You are Vietnamese, but "Yorozuya" is Japanese. Pardon me, if I still harbor suspicions.
PS. The "Rent A White Guy" videos were not just intended for you. It was a continuation of the IQ thread that mysteriously disappeared yesterday. The thread was on the David Piffer paper which claimed Vietnamese had the highest predicted IQ, which I was actually arguing against. Chinese nationalists kept trying lump themselves with Japanese and Koreans as the "top" Asians. Again, I was actually arguing against Piffer premise, but they thought I was arguing for it.
Look at the number of posts I've made. I've never read your post until page 4 of this thread.Yeah right, the member Viet who has a habit of trying to make friends with anti-Vietnamese racist Chinese members while me, the guy hated by Chinese nationalists. Nice rationalisation there buddy. And nice projection.
I'm a bit leery of any Asian netizen who adopts the "identity", if you will, of another Asian ethnicity.If that is how you rationalise it then the only response I have to that is : or
Anway, I have already stated who I am and I do not care if people believe it or not.