What's new

Anti-Huawei fear factor has just been exposed as a myth

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
Anti-Huawei fear factor has just been exposed as a myth

Adam Garrie - 10-Apr-2019

ac4302019f9d49bba14a6ddc6a8cee48.jpg


Editor's Note: Adam Garrie is the director of the UK-based global policy and analysis think tank Eurasia Future and co-host of talk show "The History Boys." The article reflects the author's opinion, and not necessarily the views of CGTN.


Reports have surfaced indicating that the U.S. tech giant Apple is looking to purchase Balong 5000 chipsets from
the Chinese tech giant Huawei. This comes after Apple has apparently struggled to develop satisfactory 5G technology of its own.

It is not uncommon for companies like Apple to purchase chips from other producers, but by approaching Huawei, Apple has inadvertently proved several important points.

First of all, while Donald Trump's administration contends that Huawei's 5G products are tools of "espionage" rather than consumer goods, America's top smartphone maker appears to view things differently.

Based on the current reports, Apple sees potential deals with Huawei as business as usual within the context of a highly competitive market in which both Apple and Huawei have clear and rational interests.

Besides, while it has been logically suggested that the U.S. government's anti-Huawei position has been one which invokes a security scare tactic in order to stifle free and fair business conditions, Apple is exploring the possibility that cooperating with Huawei over 5G innovation might make more business sense than trying to spend millions in order to try and outdo the Chinese company which is widely acknowledged as the global leader in 5G development.

bbd1dbaa886c4420ba10d4df9403dc52.jpg


A board with Huawei advertisement and an Apple store are seen in Shanghai, January 19, 2019. /VCG Photo

Here too, standard business practices are at play as many international car makers often purchase engines from ostensible competitors rather than waste money trying to outdo engines that can scarcely be improved upon.

Huawei representatives have refused to comment on the matter but this has only increased speculation regarding Apple's potential for cooperation with China's top 5G innovator. Although conventional wisdom would suggest that such a development might set Apple on the course for a showdown against the U.S. government, this is not necessarily the case when one takes a long view of the matter.

In the 1980s, during China's reform and opening-up, the country's then leader Deng Xiaoping realized that it was important for Chinese industry to learn from international best practices in order to develop a major domestic industrial base with Chinese characteristics that could evolve into a major innovator over the long term.

Today, China is rapidly transforming itself from a significant producer of industrial and technological goods into a key global innovator of such goods. As Chinese President Xi Jinping's drive to replace the concept of "Made in China" with "Created in China" is still in its early stages, the world will soon see ever more key innovations coming out of China.

Just as Chinese industry gained experience through cooperation with foreign partners after 1978, so too can non-Chinese companies like Apple now attain win-win results from partnering with companies like Huawei.

As Donald Trump himself stated that he wants U.S. companies to be at the forefront of both 5G and "6G," it actually makes perfect sense for Apple to strengthen the reputation of its own brand by working with a partner that has established itself at the forefront of the next big phase of mobile data development.

5b90f4ac587c4b8f9adac4ef95d206a0.jpg


An Apple retail location is open for business on Prince Street in the Soho section of New York City, November 27, 2018. /VCG photo

Whether or not Apple and Huawei end up partners in the future, the fact remains that in a world where technology transcends national frontiers, the best method through which to put the best and most cost-effective technology into the hands of ordinary people is for innovators throughout the world to cooperate in the pursuit of win-win outcomes.

Both Huawei and Apple are significant companies that will almost certainly continue to innovate well into the future. If such companies were to pool their capabilities through various cooperative endeavors, not only would this be a sound business decision but it would help to improve the lives of ordinary people who can benefit greatly from the immense potential inherent in 5G technology.

https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d674d304d544f33457a6333566d54/index.html
 
I think Apple should make a good relationship with many potential suppliers, up to get a special treatment.

So any new technological breakthrough, Apple get it first, even exclusive, that only available on Apple product.

Even if Apple should pay more, it's fine because Apple product is more expensive than others.

But at least, Apple can still up to what they want to be.
 
I think Apple should make a good relationship with many potential suppliers, up to get a special treatment.

So any new technological breakthrough, Apple get it first, even exclusive, that only available on Apple product.

Even if Apple should pay more, it's fine because Apple product is more expensive than others.

But at least, Apple can still up to what they want to be.
True in a business point of view but apple gets arm bent to conform to US regime policy same as any other US companies

They are state controlled.
 
Reports have surfaced indicating that the U.S. tech giant Apple is looking to purchase Balong 5000 chipsets from
the Chinese tech giant Huawei. This comes after Apple has apparently struggled to develop satisfactory 5G technology of its own.

It is not uncommon for companies like Apple to purchase chips from other producers, but by approaching Huawei, Apple has inadvertently proved several important points.

Based on the current reports, Apple sees potential deals with Huawei

Wow what a stretch of the facts!!

The only news is two days ago Huawei affirmed it was NOT going to sell its Balong 5000 chipset to competing phone manufacturers except maybe to Apple if they wanted it.

Apple is suing Qualcomm (the 5G chipset maker) and the other chipset makers (Samsung and Intel) won’t be ready until later 2019.

Two days ago:
https://iphone.appleinsider.com/art...pen-to-selling-its-5g-modem-but-only-to-apple
Huawei may be open to selling its 5G modem, but only to Apple

“Chinese telecoms giant Huawei is allegedly willing to sell its 5G Balong 5000 modem, but only to one other smartphone maker: Apple

...

In practice it's extremely unlikely that Apple would turn to Huawei”
 
Last edited:
BS. Selling advance tech for telecom or computing purposes SHOULD be a domestic affair, even if that means a delay of months to a few years.

The very real risks of espionage by known expansionist powers like China is just far too great.
 
BS. Selling advance tech for telecom or computing purposes SHOULD be a domestic affair, even if that means a delay of months to a few years.

The very real risks of espionage by known expansionist powers like China is just far too great.

As I recall China deemed Microsoft Windows a security risk for government machines. It’s not like there is no basis for all this security risk talk. You don’t hear the US outraged over the Windows ban by China. The US can see the rational for their decision (Microsoft could push an attack software autoupdate) however the Chinese don’t want to see the rational for our decision (Huawei could push an attack software autoupdate).
 
Last edited:
Huawei launches Ark Compiler – aims to improve Android system efficiency

By Simran Singh
-
Apr 11, 2019

At the product launch event in China, Huawei announced a new Ark Compiler aiming to improve Android system efficiency. Huawei’s consumer business CEO Yu Chengdong says the compiler will make Android App compilation more fluent. It will facilitate the interpretation and execution of the whole Android compilation process.

VFm6-hvntnkq6581640.jpg

Ark Compiler

The Ark Compiler brings support for architecture level optimizations resulting in significant performance improvements. It will make the Android system more responsive and robust against different actions. Yu reveals that the new compiler can improve system fluency by 24%, system response by 44% and enhance operations of third-party apps by 60%. It will further strengthen multitasking by optimizing several processes and resulting in better speed and performance. Improved battery performance, faster execution speeds and compatibility across all new Android devices term Ark as the best alternative for ART (Android Runtime).

Huawei won’t hold any usage rights for Ark Compiler, which means it will be open source for the industry. Huawei expects app developers to soon start using the new refined compiler for Android. :-)

Currently, Android is using the inbuilt ART virtual machine to compile the application code into machine code. The virtual machine dynamically loads and execute the machine code on the Android system. It is 2x faster than the Dalvik VM which was found in the earlier Android builds.

The Ark compiler will further improve the efficiency of the Android system. It will solve problems currently faced by ART. Technical details for the Ark compiler are missing right now.

https://www.gizmochina.com/2019/04/11/huawei-ark-compiler-launch/
 
As I recall China deemed Microsoft Windows a security risk for government machines. It’s not like there is no basis for all this security risk talk. You don’t hear the US outraged over the Windows ban by China. The US can see the rational for their decision (Microsoft could push an attack software autoupdate) however the Chinese don’t want to see the rational for our decision (Huawei could push an attack software autoupdate).

Banned at specific sensitive Chinese government functions vs. across the board ban in entire US of Huawei? is that even the same?
 
BS. Selling advance tech for telecom or computing purposes SHOULD be a domestic affair, even if that means a delay of months to a few years.

The very real risks of espionage by known expansionist powers like China is just far too great.

Wow just as I predicted the basis for the OP article was all nonsense. Holy cow what a paid shill that guy Adam Garrie who wrote the article was!! Evidence Huawei is paying for positive public relations articles. He made it all up.

Check it out:
https://9to5mac.com/2019/04/16/apple-qualcomm-5g-iphone-2020/

Report: Apple to use Qualcomm’s 5G modems starting with the 2020 iPhones



Just hours ago, Apple announced that it had reached a deal with Qualcomm to end all litigation between the companies. Now, a report from Nikkeisays that the agreement will see Apple use Qualcomm’s 5G modems in the 2020 iPhones.

According to the report, Apple and Qualcomm had been negotiating the settlement “for weeks” leading up to today. As the settlement talks advanced, Apple reportedly started testing Qualcomm’s 5G modem chips and asked its suppliers to do the same.

While it’s too late for Apple to add Qualcomm modems to the 2019 iPhone lineup, today’s report indicates that the 2020 iPhones will feature 5G modem chips supplied by Qualcomm:

“It is too late for Apple to use Qualcomm’s chips this year, but for 2020 it will purchase modem chips, including 5G modem chips, from the chipmaker for iPhones after finalizing the deal,” a source with direct knowledge of the settlement plan told Nikkei.

During its legal battle with Qualcomm, reports suggested that Apple was going to rely on Intel for 5G iPhone modems. Intel, however, struggled to hit deadlines and it was unclear whether or not its modems would be available in time for the 2020 iPhones.

“Apple had been a little concerned whether a sole supplier for modems could affect the company’s plan to introduce its first 5G smartphone next year,” a person familiar with the matter said.

As part of the settlement, Apple made an undisclosed payment to Qualcomm – likely due to the $7.5 billion in royalties Apple and its suppliers withheld from Qualcomm during the dispute. Furthermore, the settlement includes a six-year license agreement between the two companies, as well as a two-year option to extend and a multiyear chipset supply agreement.
 
Last edited:

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom