Ancient Man and His First Civilizations.Proving Aryan Invasion Theory is a myth and severe lie

[Water Car Engineer]

A bunch of albino Indians doesnt prove anything..

Like someone else said, they're not a race too.

 

[TimeToScoot]

AIT is still the most plausible theory. Out of Indian theory is totally fake. And of course, northern Indian languages are part of Indo-Iranian language. Which shows that Iranian and Sanskrit came from the same source, the same people. The most plausible explanation about Indo-Aryan language is that its brought from central Asia/Iran into India by some ancestors of today's Indians. Whether its by migration or invasion, it does not matter.

You're free to believe in it. Billions of people believe they will go to some imaginary heaven/hell after death despite living in an information/scientific age. You're no different. But you must also know that the world has moved on.

For others who wish to know more about the Aryan Invasion Theory you must check this out

Some others

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

So you find nothing better than just an idiotic movie to judge a country like India? Feel pity for you.

I know it's an idiotic movie. It's just if they are going to show a humorous twist to the usual western stereotypes at least they could hire some actors that could portray it better. Show the white people with crappy/missing teeth and everybody else gleaming white perfection.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

No evidence exists or has been found that proves an 'Aryan Invasion'. We are not talking about a small skirmish here or there, but a massive all destructive one that forced one civilization to migrate from a place to another. No evidence exists. Recent work has put too many question marks on the AIT to be taken as the Truth.
Discovery, NatGEO and others have also made enough documentaries to this effect. Is it too hard to accept that we belong here? Perhaps to some...

The West had its reasons. Now that reason is pretty much gone - so most of the research is ironically done in the West itself. Most of the debunking of AIT was done by Western indologists in the last couple of decades.

Starting from Indus to the Brahmaputra - the same people have been living for 10000+ years.

While I am not claiming that there is an Out of India phenomenon, but thinking the Great Aryans moved in and removed the entire existing people to the South, and suddenly gifted a rich culture is beyond my level of acceptance. Maybe if I am high, I may accept it, otherwise not

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

Hinduism is completely indigenous to the Indian sub-continent. Your fantasies may now take a break.

Another LOL Hinduism doesn't exist until the Aryan & the local religions got mixed together no Hindu without the Vedic which are also written in Sanskrit which the Aryans also brought.

 

[Black Widow]

Another LOL Hinduism doesn't exist until the Aryan & the local religions got mixed together no Hindu without the Vedic which are also written in Sanskrit which the Aryans also brought.

Yes yes and civilization begin 2000 year ago (for christians) or 1500 Year Ago (For Muslim). Before that there was nothing..


Who were "Pre Ice Age" people living in Dwarka? They were Worshiping Lord Vishnu and you are saying Hinduism is few year old..

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

Yes yes and civilization begin 2000 year ago (for christians) or 1500 Year Ago (For Muslim). Before that there was nothing..


Who were "Pre Ice Age" people living in Dwarka? They were Worshiping Lord Vishnu and you are saying Hinduism is few year old..

Seeing Indian post always makes me laugh. Explain where vedic came from then, why its written in the language the local doesn't even understand, why is the caste System & vedic remain the foundation of Hinduism?

 

[manlion]

The dwellers of Indus valley were Dravidians. The existence of the Brahui tribe in Balochistan, Pakistan who speak a Dravidian language like South Indian Tamil, gives evidence that a migration did occur.

The Harappa religion has many similarities with elements of Hinduism, popular in the present Dravidian culture. The analysis of the signs on the inscriptions found in the IVC has led several scholars to the view that the language is not of the Indo-European , or the Sumerians ,Elamite, nor the Munda languages of India. If it is related to any modern language family it appears to be Dravidian akin to Old Tamil

Sir John Marshall, was the first scholar to suggest that the language of the IVC was Dravidian. Piero Meriggi in his book “ Zur_Indus Scrift “ (On the Indus Script) was of the opinion that Brahui, a Dravidian Language spoken in Balochistan, must be the original language of the Harappans

Brahui (Urdu: براہوی) or Brahvi (براوی) is a Dravidian language spoken by Brahui people of Pakistan and Afghanistan, and expatriate communities in Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Iraq, and Iran. It is isolated from the nearest Dravidian-speaking neighbour population by a distance of more than 1,500 kilometres (930 mi)

Brahui Research Institute

 

[Black Widow]

Seeing Indian post always makes me laugh. Explain where vedic came from then, why its written in the language the local doesn't even understand, why is the caste System & vedic remain the foundation of Hinduism?

First you tell me which country you belong.. Based on your native country I will reply you...

 

[Marshmallow]

Nah, I wouldn't say that this is my favorite topic even though I have discussed the Indo-Iranian migrations multiple times. Many people tend to have an extremely biased view of history, & no amount of debunking would change that. Besides, all of these points have been discussed & refuted many times by many people. You may read up on more credible sources if you are interested in the Proto-Indo-European tribes, which includes the Indo-Iranians alongside the origins of haplogroups R1a & R1b. In any case, I am not in the mood to waste my time by discussing this topic at the moment.

y in a bad mood? is ur job goin ok?

 

[SrNair]

Hindu religion and caste system was brought to India by the Aryans. Prior to the Aryan invasion, Indian civilization was as advanced as the Astraloid of Australia when the Brits first went there.

Your version of Aryans must keep in your own hand you dont need to teach me.I said this because a I got a lot info about
this subject from renowned researchers.Native population of India creates advanced Indus Valley civilization not foreigners .Foreigners with white skins late came here to take that advantage.Anyway I dont need to argue to you.You are not an Indian.I only care about our Indians opinion.After all we Indians suffered with third rate AIT theory not foreigners.

Indian's hatred of whites can be defined by this video

this is what you got.There is 120 crore people in India .so we dont care about this third rate video.

Local indians lol, dravidians being ivc people theory has been put to rest. Nomadic yes but They gave you Rig Veda and hindu religion, have some respect for them.

No there is twist.It is west propaganda .Only thing invading Aryans do is to twist the fact in Rig veda.Later it known like that.
A brahmin must be a noble man or his/her action made him noble.But white Aryans converted it in to name of colour.Over white people is superior.that is their contributions .

 

[SrNair]

Why so much worry?
When Aryans came Dravdians were already civilized most part of India. Now consider, Aryans and Dravidian survived along for thousands of years together so lets take the optimistic part that we can prosper together unlike other ethnicity. Don't take this as divide between Dravidian and Aryans.

Albino is a genetic mutation not a race. since its being used in very wrong way the whole article just crap.

I am worrying about a fact that is still some of our education systems taught wrong history to our Indians.And glorifying Aryans and AIT .Dravidians create this advanced civilization Aryans take advantage of this and twist all noble fact for their own advantage and create caste and colour. We must revamp our history texts.And instead of Aryans they must know our local population creates advanced population.We dont need to pass our early west taught burden to our future generation.

Another LOL Hinduism doesn't exist until the Aryan & the local religions got mixed together no Hindu without the Vedic which are also written in Sanskrit which the Aryans also brought.

That is a perfect idiotic statement .If Aryans are so much advanced why they cant create an advanced civilization in central asia itself.Dont argue without a rational analysis.Hinduism is a way of life not some conservative religion form under one God.
It roots are flow in Indian life thousands of years ago before Aryans arrive and Aryans contribution pathetic caste system.A noble system created by local Indians twisted and make it under caste, creed and colour.thats all.

 

[good_boy]

No evidence exists or has been found that proves an 'Aryan Invasion'. We are not talking about a small skirmish here or there, but a massive all destructive one that forced one civilization to migrate from a place to another. No evidence exists. Recent work has put too many question marks on the AIT to be taken as the Truth.
Discovery, NatGEO and others have also made enough documentaries to this effect. Is it too hard to accept that we belong here? Perhaps to some...

The West had its reasons. Now that reason is pretty much gone - so most of the research is ironically done in the West itself. Most of the debunking of AIT was done by Western indologists in the last couple of decades.

Starting from Indus to the Brahmaputra - the same people have been living for 10000+ years.

While I am not claiming that there is an Out of India phenomenon, but thinking the Great Aryans moved in and removed the entire existing people to the South, and suddenly gifted a rich culture is beyond my level of acceptance. Maybe if I am high, I may accept it, otherwise not

Or bhai mere ASI-ANI admixture is at most 4200 years old, and between brahmins its just 2300 years old. lol Look at Marathi, South Indian and Bengali brahmins, do they look like local population? How will you explain genetic and phenotype differences?

The dwellers of Indus valley were Dravidians. The existence of the Brahui tribe in Balochistan, Pakistan who speak a Dravidian language like South Indian Tamil, gives evidence that a migration did occur.

The Harappa religion has many similarities with elements of Hinduism, popular in the present Dravidian culture. The analysis of the signs on the inscriptions found in the IVC has led several scholars to the view that the language is not of the Indo-European , or the Sumerians ,Elamite, nor the Munda languages of India. If it is related to any modern language family it appears to be Dravidian akin to Old Tamil

Sir John Marshall, was the first scholar to suggest that the language of the IVC was Dravidian. Piero Meriggi in his book “ Zur_Indus Scrift “ (On the Indus Script) was of the opinion that Brahui, a Dravidian Language spoken in Balochistan, must be the original language of the Harappans



Brahui Research Institute

Just in case you didn't know, Brahui people have lowest amount of ASI genes in them compared to anyother South Asian group. They are not related to South Indians at all genetically. Indo-Aryan Bengali is more similar to Dravidian south indian. SO even IVC people were not South Indians but ANI.

 

[good_boy]

That is a perfect idiotic statement .If Aryans are so much advanced why they cant create an advanced civilization in central asia itself.Dont argue without a rational analysis.Hinduism is a way of life not some conservative religion form under one God.
It roots are flow in Indian life thousands of years ago before Aryans arrive and Aryans contribution pathetic caste system.A noble system created by local Indians twisted and make it under caste, creed and colour.thats all.

lol local Indians, please explain the differences between brahmins and local indians even now let alone 2500 years ago.

 

[faithfulguy]

Your version of Aryans must keep in your own hand you dont need to teach me.I said this because a I got a lot info about
this subject from renowned researchers.Native population of India creates advanced Indus Valley civilization not foreigners .Foreigners with white skins late came here to take that advantage.Anyway I dont need to argue to you.You are not an Indian.I only care about our Indians opinion.After all we Indians suffered with third rate AIT theory not foreigners.



this is what you got.There is 120 crore people in India .so we dont care about this third rate video.



No there is twist.It is west propaganda .Only thing invading Aryans do is to twist the fact in Rig veda.Later it known like that.
A brahmin must be a noble man or his/her action made him noble.But white Aryans converted it in to name of colour.Over white people is superior.that is their contributions .

To deny AIT and even spread lies about how Indo-European language spread from India is equivalent to saying that English originated from India and its Indians that colonialize Britain and brought English and democracy to England. If teaching your people lies is the only way to prevent from suffering, that you should come up with another way to not to suffer.