The highlighted is the key part.
I don't think so. That is a subsequent derivative of the discussion that flows from the original proposition.
We can safely ignore the Taiwanese pests on this thread who keep on making the same noise irrespective of the topic.
If you are referring to @
faithfulguy , he is not one of my favourite posters, but he is making some pretty effective points. I think he should be heard, not abused.
The colonialists motives were clear from the outset in coming up with pathetic speculation which they used very effectively to divide the society and we are still paying the price.
This conflates two different bodies of thought: the first being the attempt to justify colonial domination of India per se, the second being to understand their own social structures and political and financial networks in Europe, and even in the world.
Then there are the spoys, the more loyal the king crowd, with their own political agenda that is the biggest drum beater of this theory.
I suppose you mean those of us who are opposed to the OOI theory, and believe that the AIT itself is flawed, and have evolved it to a better, more suited narrative. Your military metaphors are noted with interest; they might return at some future date. I note that you are now wholly in the ranks of the Hindutva crowd.
Now the colonialist minded academics don't have to do much, any opposing view is shouted down by the sepoys as coming from "Hindu fanatics", "fundamentalists", "right wingers", "Hindutwa" and so on.
Here we go.
Interesting to see how you practice what you preach. This seems to be a single-minded concentration on the interaction, and not on the facts of the discussion. Isn't that precisely what you complained against?
This shouting brigade (and their colonialist masters) never look at the merit of the argument, that is the beauty of it.
And it thinks entitled to their continuing domination of the narrative.
Sadly for them, their days of domination are coming to an end.
Quite a flourish, but what precisely did you add, besides a commentary on the way that the topic was discussed, rather than contributing to the discussion on the topic?
Is nt this gross disrespect to Hinduism ?
We know Hinduism has a lot of malpractices, but which religion does not ?
Does a few people blowing themselves in jihad mean Islam is goo ?
This bigot does not have any respect for other people's beliefs and is the first to call others fundoo.
I remember he was calling me a Internet Hindu and calling himself a secular in the same sentence when I first joined this forum, after I ruined his pseudo intellectual charade in some other thread.
His defence- term Internet Hindu was given by a Hindu so its perfectly ok to use it to insult Hindus.
Disgusting turd of a human.
If it pleases you to think that you won a famous victory, keep dreaming on. Good that you have such an excellent opinion of yourself. Someone has to, after all.
As far as the rest of the world is concerned, I believe that our respective ratings tell the tale in clear and direct terms.