Analysis: How to wipe out Islamic terror

[Maritimer]

Uniform civil code, Article 370, illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, sleeper cells of global terror networks, are all nationalist issues and not "hindu" issues. While Swamy's methods are crazy and are to be rejected outright, the Indian nation has to seriously debate on these issues. India is a holy land for all Bharatiya peoples - Kashi, Mathura, Ayodhya, Haridwar et al cannot be established outside India. No amount of invasion, destruction, looting or colonialism can disturb the holiness of these sites.

Islamic terror cannot be wiped out by intimidating the Muslims in India, instead, the moderate form of Islam must be encouraged by Muslim leaders. There are enough positive Muslim legacies in India to draw inspiration for the Indian Muslims, no need to go the Al Qaeda-Taliban-Pakistan way.

 

[asad71]

1.Terrorism is terrorism. It has no religion. Adding an adjective to terrorism - whether Muslim, Christian, Hindu or Buddhist, only exposes a motivated exercise. Islam is a religion of peace, love and tolerance. The Western effort seems to be to create real terrorists by referring to the Muslims night and day as terrorists. The Western media never mentions Christian terrorists in N Ireland or those who have invaded Iraq or Afghanistan.

2. This Indian mantri-ji was talking 'bakwas'.

 

[LiberalAtheist]

we must not let religion cloud our judgement before 1947 we were just fine and today now look.... my great aunt and her family ran away from her birthplace of Guranjawala and came back to India with her 2 daughters 1 son and husband with just the clothes on her back they left there livestock food and jewelry in her house that she was born and raised in although she was given new land and some money the loss of a homeland never really went away

god is one please don't use religion as a tool of propaganda or hate

 

[ashokdeiva]

1.Terrorism is terrorism. It has no religion. Adding an adjective to terrorism - whether Muslim, Christian, Hindu or Buddhist, only exposes a motivated exercise. Islam is a religion of peace, love and tolerance. The Western effort seems to be to create real terrorists by referring to the Muslims night and day as terrorists. The Western media never mentions Christian terrorists in N Ireland or those who have invaded Iraq or Afghanistan.

2. This Indian mantri-ji was talking 'bakwas'.

IRA is a different case, the fight for freedom is different, and the fight for Religion and home land for one religion is different. Al queda, can you say by what mooto they fight and kill., Taliban can you say by what mooto they fight and kill, they all kill just for the name of Islam, i am not advocating that all Muslims are terrorist, but my point is that more Muslims are easily manipulated by half baked Islamic scholers who call them as Mullhas

 

[Elmo]

Have moved the thread out of Indian Defence to Current Affairs...

 

[T-Rex]

IRA is a different case, the fight for freedom is different, and the fight for Religion and home land for one religion is different. Al queda, can you say by what mooto they fight and kill., Taliban can you say by what mooto they fight and kill, they all kill just for the name of Islam, i am not advocating that all Muslims are terrorist, but my point is that more Muslims are easily manipulated by half baked Islamic scholers who call them as Mullhas

IRA fights for freedom, the Hindu fundamentalists fight for their religion but only Al Queda fights for killing people, isn't that your logic? Your hypocrisy is very plain to see. Listen Mr. can you tell me the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist? I bet you don't have the slightest intention to touch the subject objectively. Your purpose is to vilify Islamists and that prevents you from analysing the issue objectively.

 

[ashokdeiva]

IRA fights for freedom, the Hindu fundamentalists fight for their religion but only Al Queda fights for killing people, isn't that your logic? Your hypocrisy is very plain to see. Listen Mr. can you tell me the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist? I bet you don't have the slightest intention to touch the subject objectively. Your purpose is to vilify Islamists and that prevents you from analysing the issue objectively.

Wel, Subash Chandra Boss is a freedom fighter, Osama is a Terrorist.
Don't you see the difference. When you fight for freedom for your people who are discriminated then you are freedom fighter. Osama was once a freedom fighter for Taliban, but when he achieved that Goal he should have started developing the country for which he fought for but he and his Talib brothers draged the country 100 years back trying to create a Utopia. Afgans economy was on only cultivating and selling drugs to the world. And he became a terrorist when he killed thousands of innocent men by blowing up US embasies and WTC.
Simple definition for a freedom fighter is, about taking the fight to the people in power and not about killing the civilians

 

[T-Rex]

Wel, Subash Chandra Boss is a freedom fighter, Osama is a Terrorist.
Don't you see the difference. When you fight for freedom for your people who are discriminated then you are freedom fighter. Osama was once a freedom fighter for Taliban, but when he achieved that Goal he should have started developing the country for which he fought for but he and his Talib brothers draged the country 100 years back trying to create a Utopia. Afgans economy was on only cultivating and selling drugs to the world. And he became a terrorist when he killed thousands of innocent men by blowing up US embasies and WTC.
Simple definition for a freedom fighter is, about taking the fight to the people in power and not about killing the civilians

You call Subash a freedom fighter but the British called him a terrorist, do you remember? So your Subash was as good a terrorist as Osama.

 

[ashokdeiva]

You call Subash a freedom fighter but the British called him a terrorist, do you remember? So your Subash was as good a terrorist as Osama.

and who won, Subash had a dreem of a free India, though he did not live long to see his Nation smell freedom, his dream came true.
And what Osama achieved, a big nothing. Subash never killed civilians, he confronted the British is a battle field and not like your Coward Osama who dug a hole to hide is pathetic life and strike the civilians with brain wased idiots.

 

[Janubaba]

I find it ridiculous that a former Union minister of India can be so closet minded and is calling for a state along the lines of Israel.

I would want the Indians' opinion on this above article and I wonder how many of them think along the same bigoted lines too?

India Stop killing Kashmiris and Muslims in Gujrat or otherwise you will keep facing backlash

 

[T-Rex]

and who won, Subash had a dreem of a free India, though he did not live long to see his Nation smell freedom, his dream came true.
And what Osama achieved, a big nothing. Subash never killed civilians, he confronted the British is a battle field and not like your Coward Osama who dug a hole to hide is pathetic life and strike the civilians with brain wased idiots.

Why do you evade my question? Wasn't Subash called a terrorist by the British? In the same manner you call the kashmiri freedom fighters terrorists

 

[Splurgenxs]

Why do you evade my question? Wasn't Subash called a terrorist by the British? In the same manner you call the kashmiri freedom fighters terrorists

If u can please learn to read ,the dude has already explained, that its not in the same manner.

Bi***es like Osama are the ones shooting from the shoulders of women and children.
Ur attempt to derive significance from all this is pathetic as usual.

 

[Rig Vedic]

Swamy's ideas are not realistic. This is a multidimensional problem involving issues of better intelligence operations, policing, social welfare, economic development etc. Ultimately "Islamic terrorism" will collapse when its proponents realize that they are wasting their lives following a bankrupt ideology.

 

[ashokdeiva]

Why do you evade my question? Wasn't Subash called a terrorist by the British? In the same manner you call the kashmiri freedom fighters terrorists

Subash fought the British with a regular army in a battle field, not like your Kashmiri LeT and other organization who bring to the terror to the Civilians.
Subash was called a terrorist by the British, but my above explanation is sufficient to prove it wrong.

 

[ashokdeiva]

India Stop killing Kashmiris and Muslims in Gujrat or otherwise you will keep facing backlash

YOU AND YOUR PATHETIC POSTS