What's new

An Islamic revival among urban Pakistani women

Al-Huda is a dangerous organization that acts as the harawal dasta of later radicalization. It must be stopped if sanity is to prevail.

Al-Huda is strictly wahhabi institution and to balance it, we need a sufi version of Islam. Problem is, there is no funding for this version. For Al-Huda version, funding is available from Middle East and from people influenced by their rigid ideology.

At the same time, I dont agree at all with people do at shrines. Thats taking the sufi version of Islam to extreme so much so that it becomes a very obvious 'shirk'.
 
Al-Huda is strictly wahhabi institution and to balance it, we need a sufi version of Islam. Problem is, there is no funding for this version. For Al-Huda version, funding is available from Middle East and from people influenced by their rigid ideology.

At the same time, I dont agree at all with people do at shrines. Thats taking the sufi version of Islam to extreme so much so that it becomes a very obvious 'shirk'.

It does not matter what branch of Islam is followed or promoted. All that matters is to keep matters of religion in the personal domain without imposing them on matters of State. That is all.
 
An Islamic revival among urban Pakistani women
‘Al-Huda is one of the most prominent Pakistani religious revivalist organisations, based in Islamabad, which aims to educate women about the Quran and the Sunnah.’
Haroon Khalid · Today · 08:30 am
article-uwvaasndoq-1453875556.jpeg

Photo Credit:Wikimedia Commons
The burqa has globally become the symbol of Muslim women. A common misconception is that all Muslim women cover themselves with it. “I was surprised to see that hardly any women in Lahore were wearing a burqa,” noted a friend from Mumbai who was visiting Pakistan. I could relate to what she said.

On my visits to India, I had noticed that the Muslims there exerted their religious identity much more than the Muslims in Pakistan. On the roads of Mumbai and Bengaluru, one came across many women wearing burqas. While wearing one has been a minority practice till now, at least in the urban centres of the country, there has been an increasing trend to “revert” to a display of religious symbols like the beard and hijab in the past few years.

I use the word “revert” with caution here because it implies going back to certain practices or searching for some historical roots. I believe that this is, in fact, a new phenomenon that might have parallels in Islamic history but remains a product of historical contingencies – 9/11 in particular.

In a post 9/11 world, marred with religious terrorism and counter-insurgency terrorism, it seems the world is divided into two large camps – Muslims and everybody else. In these times of heightened search for identity, Muslims have turned towards their religion to grapple with the new emerging political realities.

This soul searching, in many cases, has resulted in urban, educated Muslims adopting a version of Islam that is puritanical.

In Pakistan, there has been an increasing trend of people being drawn towards religiosity, an Islamic tradition that is not a legacy of religious syncretism like Chistiya or Barelvi, but reactionary and exclusivist, originating out of the Deoband and Ahle-Hadith schools of thought. Given the fact that this renewed interest in Islamic identity is a product of Muslim separateness from the rest of the world, it doesn’t come as a surprise that the schools of thought in vogue are those which are exclusivist.

While the impact of Islamic revivalism has trickled down to rural and “underdeveloped” places, for the most part it remains confined to urban centres due to the existing biases of the educated class in relation to non-Muslims propagated through the Pakistani education system.

In order to understand the phenomenon better, I decided to visit my former professor of Anthropology at LUMS (Lahore University of Management Sciences), Dr Sadaf Ahmad, who has recently written a book calledTransforming Faith: The Story of Al-Huda and Islamic Revivalism among Urban Pakistani Women. Al-Huda is one of the most prominent Pakistani religious revivalist organisations, based in Islamabad, which aims to educate women about the Quran and the Sunnah. Established in 1994, in the past few years, it has spread rapidly across the educated middle class of Islamabad.

Now Islamic lectures of Al-Huda are available online and are widely consumed. I was particularly interested in understanding Islamic revivalist movements in the country as a threat posed to the shrine culture discussed in this book.

Sitting across from Sadaf in her office in one of the leading universities of the country, I looked out of the window behind her and saw girls wearing jeans and freely intermingling with boys. The School of Social Sciences and Humanities has played a major role in protecting the secular culture of the university from the onslaught of fundamentalist Islamists. “It [LUMS] is an interesting island,” I remember Ayesha Siddiqa, a well-known political analyst, saying once.

But over the past few years, there have been rumours about the religious right slowly dominating the administration of the university and transforming its culture. Every time a liberal or a leftist professor leaves LUMS, there are rumours about the internal politics being the cause of his or her departure. The number of students at the university who have a beard or wear an abaya has increased considerably. I asked Sadaf if “Islamic revivalist” movements like Al-Huda were also spreading into places like LUMS.

Sadaf was conscious of the fact that the display of Islamic religiosity in the university was on the rise, much like it was in general Pakistani society, but she was not sure if that could be attributed to any particular religious movement.

“I sometimes receive emails from students saying that they cannot study Anthropology of Religion. ‘Our faith is not strong enough at this stage,’ is what they say,” she told me. “Study of anthropology allows one to understand concepts from different perspectives. It means recognising that different people have different truths. This, some students feel, will undermine their faith.”

I asked Sadaf if the women who were attracted to Al-Huda and were critical of shrine culture were aware of the cultural and philosophical underpinnings of these shrines.

“No,” she said. “They criticise the rituals and rites at these shrines but beyond that they have little understanding of its culture. Most of the women who had joined Al-Huda at the time I studied them were those who had a disconnect with the local traditions. They respected the saints but were also apologetic about them. ‘The saints did what they did because of the conditions prevalent at that time’ is a common argument they give.

It is said, for example, that Muslim Sufis had to turn to qawwalis to attract Hindus who enjoyed bhajans. On the other hand, it is interesting to note that women who come from backgrounds imbued in Barelvi ethos are not easily attracted to this movement.”

“This means, according to them, that there is no longer any need to practise that form of Islam because there aren’t any Hindus around,” I added.

“At the classes the women are instructed about Islamic culture and ethos that is not indigenous but Arabic in essence. Local cultural practices like Basant or Mehndi are looked down upon and discouraged. Particularly, attention is given to da’wa [preaching of Islam] and dars. Women who are trained at this institution take up an active role in spreading their messages within their communities and societies through dars.

“One of the main reasons behind the success of the movement is the religious background of its students. Most of the women who come to Al-Huda already have faith in Islam by virtue of growing up in a Muslim household and nation and also being educated in an Islamised education system. What they don’t have is scriptural knowledge, which is then provided to them through their study of Islam at Al-Huda.

“Even though Al-Huda claims that it doesn’t adhere to any particular school of thought, their interpretation of Islam is similar to the Ahle-Hadith strand. They thus propagate a particular understanding of Islam as ‘true’ Islam and that is how it is perceived by its students who have no access to alternate approaches to Islamic scriptural knowledge. Another key reason why Al-Huda is successful in spreading its understanding of Islam among middle-class women is that its approach resonates with the kind of women who come to the school to study Islam.

“The middle class values education and as such they lean towards an institute that offers scriptural knowledge [as opposed to leaning towards a religious group which focuses on traditional rituals]. Their reason for deeming the Islamic discourse that they are exposed to as authoritative is not just related to their lack of alternative scriptural knowledge but also because they deem Farhat Hashmi, who began the school, to be a religious authority.

“Farhat Hashmi has a PhD in Hadith Sciences from Glasgow and heavily relies upon scientic concepts and logic to explain her religious arguments. Such credentials and such an approach resonate in a class that values education and science, and enhances the credibility of the school and subsequently its message.”

Sadaf explained that Al-Huda’s proselytising takes place in a faith-based framework that is already extant in Pakistani society through its politics and educational system. Here at the school, for the first time, these women study primary texts and understand them literally. I told her about the shrine of Baba Naulakha where the visitors who are generally uneducated are made to believe that the natural marks on the rocks are miraculous names of God and the Prophet, and thus sacred.

“For an educated mind, such a tradition would be difficult to absorb,” I commented.

“Faith or belief has little to do with education. But certainly, the fact that Al-Huda is making inroads into the elite class of the society and is able to spread a particular understanding of Islam within it, is significantly due to the fact that no other spiritual movement has been able to provide an avenue for the educated class to explore the scriptural texts in a manner that resonates with them,” Sadaf replied.

“When a puritanical religious approach becomes the dominant school of thought, could it be said then that Pakistani society would eventually become an extremist state in terms of its politics?” I asked.

“Al-Huda claims that it is an apolitical organisation and strictly forbids political discussions in its classrooms. ‘Focus on becoming better Muslims’, is what the teachers tell their students who wish to discuss political matters. They also strongly discourage participation in political rallies. So they essentially have a bottom-up approach: they train the women who Islamise the environment in their households and neighbourhoods. This eventually would create an environment in which the implementation of Sharia would be the next logical step.”

“When that happens I will grow a beard and you can wear a burqa to fit in,” I joked with her. “That would be the time to leave the country,” she replied with a straight face.

“In this growing environment of religious puritanism, how do you think these shrines are likely to fare in the future? Would shrine culture eventually end?” I asked her.

“I don’t know. I think for shrine culture to end, things would have to become much worse than they are right now, and stay that way for a considerably long period of time. This is because shrine culture is so deeply embedded in our society that it would be hard to remove it. In order to get rid of it, the next generation needs to internalise the concept that it is wrong and unIslamic. On the other hand, you can also see that there is resurgence in the interest in Sufi poetry and music. Admittedly this section of society is still a minority and for it to have any serious impact it needs to grow in size. But that is where hope lies,” Sadaf said.

“Oh my God, Haroon. If you were at the session you would have killed her,” my sister told me at the end of the three-hour long dars. “She said that the youth of our country have strayed away from our culture. They mimic the West or India by celebrating Valentine’s Day or Basant. These festivals have nothing to do with our culture and also that women should not work because their incomes bring ill-fate to a household.”

“You don’t know how I controlled myself,” Anam told me.

“I thought the session was nice,” said Uzma, my sister’s friend. She has done her Master’s in Journalism from a leading women’s college of the country and is now a housewife. “Some of the things she said were informative.”

“How can she even say it is unIslamic for women to work?” I asked. “What about Hazrat Khadijah, the first wife of the Prophet? Wasn’t she a businesswoman? She can only impress people who don’t know history or culture. What ‘our’ culture is she talking about? Isn’t Heer Ranjha part of Punjabi culture? It is the most celebrated folk story here. For centuries it has been sung and dramatised. It is essentially a celebration of love. How is it any different from the celebration of Valentine’s Day? In fact, the celebration of Heer Ranjha’s love is much more profound than Valentine’s Day. In our culture it has taken metaphysical dimensions, by becoming part of the folk religion. We worship love, not only celebrate it.”

Excerpted with permission fromIn Search of Shiva: A Study of Folk Religious Practices in Pakistan, Haroon Khalid, Rupa Books.
Islamic extremism and terrorism is responsible for so much killing and destruction in Pakistan.Yet Pakistanis are going down deeper and deeper into this cesspool? Is this stockholm syndrome on a national scale or what?

Thats great if you think so....
But i think these women look more prettier
pleated-green-hijab-shirt-196x300.jpg
frilly-green-hijab-shirt-199x300.jpg
green-new-topcoat-styles-198x300.jpg
green-hijab-shirt-with-belt-221x300.jpg



Well said
Khuda ko manana Or khudi ki manana 2 different batain hain
These women are pretty with or without these headcover.The common tactic of islamic extremist is to use beautiful pretty women in stylish head cover and brainwash the common girl to wear potato sack called 'burqa' which look horrible on most of the girl.:ph34r:
 
Last edited:
Tashfeen Malik was a student of Al-Huda. Fact.

For not even a year and left before completing her Diploma. FACT.

Using science to "prove" religious beliefs is logically an invalid exercise. It can never work, no matter which religion, including Islam.



It is up to parents to determine how they wish their children to be educated in private. It is up to the State and Society to require a certain standard of education for all of its citizens, if they so chose.
And where did I blame al huda for her act
You are not doing it But @Syed.Haider.Ali is trying to.

Al-Huda is a dangerous organization that acts as the harawal dasta of later radicalization. It must be stopped if sanity is to prevail.
Remove Islamiat from primary and secondary syllabi i while you are at it.
 
Agreed Religion should be keep in personal domain but if someone is happy to wear hijab or feel comfortable so why other are forcing her to uncover her head?

Garments are a personal choice, and should remain so.

Remove Islamiat from primary and secondary syllabi i while you are at it.

That is a good idea. Religious studies should begin only in college, and not before.
 
Last edited:
It is up to parents to determine how they wish their children to be educated in private. It is up to the State and Society to require a certain standard of education for all of its citizens, if they so chose.

I do not question the parents right to educate their children. But its a question I ask you, Muslims at large in general.
Why cant Maulanas come together and decide an minimum age only after which religious age can be imparted. Like the age of 8 etc? Starting teacing Quran as early as 3, they learn the sentence, There is no God but Allah. (Every book has something like that, I agree), dont they become intolerant to the idea of another religion? Nipping the kids in the bud?
 
What is your defination of Islamic extrimism??? Anyone who follow islamic teachings??? IF yes than may be I am also extrimist :undecided::undecided:..but I have Never killed or hurt anyone:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
& you want to say women in an Islamic state should be like these
images
3e0948b346b5faeb0663a51df21b9569.jpg
images
Best+Leather+Mini+Skirt+For+Women+2012-2.jpg

Have a look on your Modern Society:suicide::suicide2:
View attachment 290687


Agreed Religion should be keep in personal domain but if someone is happy to wear hijab or feel comfortable so why other are forcing her to uncover her head???

Incest is not that common as you believe. And those dresses are not that offensive if you live in west. I can post a hundred photos of girls wearing tight abayas showing every curve or some tharaqi babas dancing with hookers or jailed for rapes.
 
I do not question the parents right to educate their children. But its a question I ask you, Muslims at large in general.
Why cant Maulanas come together and decide an minimum age only after which religious age can be imparted. Like the age of 8 etc? Starting teacing Quran as early as 3, they learn the sentence, There is no God but Allah. (Every book has something like that, I agree), dont they become intolerant to the idea of another religion? Nipping the kids in the bud?

Catch them young is the trick and has been used by Islamic rulers for centuries.

In the 15th century the Turkish Sultans ordered their Christian subjects to supply young boys from their villages along with their taxes. These boys would be converted to Islam, taught Turkish and given military training. They were called Janissaries (New troops).
 
That's one person. Do name a Barelvi tanzeem that has bombed market places, attacked the army, slaughtered minorities and so forth. Barelvis for the most part are peaceful and follow the path of Taswuf, that's something in plain sight.

The fact that many Barelvis chose to support Qadri despite the murder he committed shows that they're not as peaceful as we think.
 
I do not question the parents right to educate their children. But its a question I ask you, Muslims at large in general.
Why cant Maulanas come together and decide an minimum age only after which religious age can be imparted. Like the age of 8 etc? Starting teacing Quran as early as 3, they learn the sentence, There is no God but Allah. (Every book has something like that, I agree), dont they become intolerant to the idea of another religion? Nipping the kids in the bud?

The very fact that religious practices have to be imposed, by itself, says a lot about how "natural" or "divine" they are, no matter how stridently claimed.
 
The fact that many Barelvis chose to support Qadri despite the murder he committed shows that they're not as peaceful as we think.

Many do, but I'd say a slight majority doesn't. There have been rallies for his release, but the numbers expected haven't been substantial. Like I said it is one man.
 
The link says they were set up to fight the various Salafist Jihadi groups.They are not terrorists and the word "reactionary" says it all.
As for Sunni Tehrik, can be extreme but they have never attacked the establishment, army or minorities. Their business has been mainly with the the likes of sipah e sahaba and lashkar e jhangvi, both universally recognised as terrorist groups, who openly attack the state and its people.







I'm not leaning towards sectarianism here, just defending my and the majorities traditional beliefs form these folks you seem to be hold in quite high esteem. Ok they don't practice Naat or Zikir as much as Barelvis do, so I take it they do at some point. Could you put any evidence e.g. videos or articles that show this? They consider Mawlid a day of remembrance? Again can you please post up evidence. Having spoken to some of them they were strictly against the Mawlid and called it an innovation. Again I'll except that this may not be their official line. By the way when they state that these practices are innovations they do mean that in the negative sense. I have't seen anything from them that state states believe in Bid'ah Say'iah and Bid'ah Hasana.
The Sufi culture didn't come from the SIkhs, where on earth did you get this from? The Sufi culture predates the Sikh faith by well over a thousand years. It is also practiced all over Pakistan and is what he masses follow, that includes all the areas you mentioned.
Here Karachi;

I see so if you kill innocents in a reaction, its not terrorism? Many of the reactionaries we see today in our tribal belt are because of the drone attacks killing madarsah kids besides others with nefarious agenda. so who started first argument fails the minute you have to clean up the mess,
These BAA'THISTS you are trying to defend were the worst from of cold-bloded mercenaries.Read up facts before coming over defending a group.Same goes for Suni tehrik they were involved in target killing people in karachi .this is sheer terrorism again you are trying to defend them which is a shame for title you hold here on pdf.

Perhaps you dont know me therefore you are not really in a good position to judge who else i hold in good esteem.If i lean more towards a particular sect just because they are in majority doesnt seem justice in anyway.
The prophet (pbuh) was born and demised the same day i.e. 12 rabial-awal.It is universally accepted by everyone as a day of remembrance. Some read quran do self-inspection rather than rejoicing it while others treat it as a festivity. Noone considers it evil only the fringe elements do like you yourself.A lot of people have already learnt to live with such small disagreements but again there are people (from both ends) that create an hostile environment.Just to let you know people from your very own group have deep disgust for those among you who misuse loudspeaker or the way they celebrate this. They would themselves call it evil if you talk to them.
I apologize if i wasnt able to convey my last point well.What i meant was sikhism and Islam practiced in and around that region have influenced each other.Its been both ways. The shrine culture and how it evolved in past two or three centuries as well as its architecture and cultural things associated.
 
Tashfeen Malik was an Al-Huda student. Figures.



Now that is a totally oxymoronic approach, given that logic and science are inapplicable to personal beliefs.
Really? Logic and science is what brang me really close to Islam because I'm a man of reasoning and logic - I dont blindly follow something. Islam has logic and science.
 
I see so if you kill innocents in a reaction, its not terrorism? Many of the reactionaries we see today in our tribal belt are because of the drone attacks killing madarsah kids besides others with nefarious agenda. so who started first argument fails the minute you have to clean up the mess,
These BAA'THISTS you are trying to defend were the worst from of cold-bloded mercenaries.Read up facts before coming over defending a group.Same goes for Suni tehrik they were involved in target killing people in karachi .this is sheer terrorism again you are trying to defend them which is a shame for title you hold here on pdf.

Perhaps you dont know me therefore you are not really in a good position to judge who else i hold in good esteem.If i lean more towards a particular sect just because they are in majority doesnt seem justice in anyway.
The prophet (pbuh) was born and demised the same day i.e. 12 rabial-awal.It is universally accepted by everyone as a day of remembrance. Some read quran do self-inspection rather than rejoicing it while others treat it as a festivity. Noone considers it evil only the fringe elements do like you yourself.A lot of people have already learnt to live with such small disagreements but again there are people (from both ends) that create an hostile environment.Just to let you know people from your very own group have deep disgust for those among you who misuse loudspeaker or the way they celebrate this. They would themselves call it evil if you talk to them.
I apologize if i wasnt able to convey my last point well.What i meant was sikhism and Islam practiced in and around that region have influenced each other.Its been both ways. The shrine culture and how it evolved in past two or three centuries as well as its architecture and cultural things associated.

Of course it is terrorism, but not of the kind that the other groups are engaged in. The drone attacks are now so infrequent, but yet we see terrorism emanating from such groups unabated. What did the Shia folk, Christians do to earn attacks from these terrorists? The drone attacks have been used an excuse by many of them to justify their blood thirsty agenda. How are the Naqshbandis Baathists? Naqshbadi is a Sufi Tareeqah, the Baathists are a secular order, that believe Islam, and the equality of all faiths. They don't follow any such Sufi order.
Regarding Sunni tehreek I was explaining the reasons for what they did, that's not a celebration or support for the acts the have done. I did call them extreme.
Please don't accuse me of supporting terror, it just makes you posts sound shallow. As for my title, if it bothers you so much go report at GHQ to the management. I've been here ever since the very inception of this site. You have just literally come on here and already started to attempt to launch personal attacks.
Look I've seen and heard people say the Mawlid is evil, and these are not "fringe" elements. They are the bulk of certain jammats. I'm not in the fringe myself. Have a look at the numbers thanking my original post, and the folks who posted afterwards, regarding their concern of this group.
I can accept small disagreements, that's fine. But I will not and I repeat will not stay quiet when this group shows malicious intent towards my beliefs.
The shrine culture you speak of is found all over the Muslim world, and I've seen it in many Muslims countries. Sikhism was a very localised faith.
 
Last edited:
An Islamic revival among urban Pakistani women
‘Al-Huda is one of the most prominent Pakistani religious revivalist organisations, based in Islamabad, which aims to educate women about the Quran and the Sunnah.’
Haroon Khalid · Today · 08:30 am
article-uwvaasndoq-1453875556.jpeg

Photo Credit:Wikimedia Commons
The burqa has globally become the symbol of Muslim women. A common misconception is that all Muslim women cover themselves with it. “I was surprised to see that hardly any women in Lahore were wearing a burqa,” noted a friend from Mumbai who was visiting Pakistan. I could relate to what she said.

On my visits to India, I had noticed that the Muslims there exerted their religious identity much more than the Muslims in Pakistan. On the roads of Mumbai and Bengaluru, one came across many women wearing burqas. While wearing one has been a minority practice till now, at least in the urban centres of the country, there has been an increasing trend to “revert” to a display of religious symbols like the beard and hijab in the past few years.

I use the word “revert” with caution here because it implies going back to certain practices or searching for some historical roots. I believe that this is, in fact, a new phenomenon that might have parallels in Islamic history but remains a product of historical contingencies – 9/11 in particular.

In a post 9/11 world, marred with religious terrorism and counter-insurgency terrorism, it seems the world is divided into two large camps – Muslims and everybody else. In these times of heightened search for identity, Muslims have turned towards their religion to grapple with the new emerging political realities.

This soul searching, in many cases, has resulted in urban, educated Muslims adopting a version of Islam that is puritanical.

In Pakistan, there has been an increasing trend of people being drawn towards religiosity, an Islamic tradition that is not a legacy of religious syncretism like Chistiya or Barelvi, but reactionary and exclusivist, originating out of the Deoband and Ahle-Hadith schools of thought. Given the fact that this renewed interest in Islamic identity is a product of Muslim separateness from the rest of the world, it doesn’t come as a surprise that the schools of thought in vogue are those which are exclusivist.

While the impact of Islamic revivalism has trickled down to rural and “underdeveloped” places, for the most part it remains confined to urban centres due to the existing biases of the educated class in relation to non-Muslims propagated through the Pakistani education system.

In order to understand the phenomenon better, I decided to visit my former professor of Anthropology at LUMS (Lahore University of Management Sciences), Dr Sadaf Ahmad, who has recently written a book calledTransforming Faith: The Story of Al-Huda and Islamic Revivalism among Urban Pakistani Women. Al-Huda is one of the most prominent Pakistani religious revivalist organisations, based in Islamabad, which aims to educate women about the Quran and the Sunnah. Established in 1994, in the past few years, it has spread rapidly across the educated middle class of Islamabad.

Now Islamic lectures of Al-Huda are available online and are widely consumed. I was particularly interested in understanding Islamic revivalist movements in the country as a threat posed to the shrine culture discussed in this book.

Sitting across from Sadaf in her office in one of the leading universities of the country, I looked out of the window behind her and saw girls wearing jeans and freely intermingling with boys. The School of Social Sciences and Humanities has played a major role in protecting the secular culture of the university from the onslaught of fundamentalist Islamists. “It [LUMS] is an interesting island,” I remember Ayesha Siddiqa, a well-known political analyst, saying once.

But over the past few years, there have been rumours about the religious right slowly dominating the administration of the university and transforming its culture. Every time a liberal or a leftist professor leaves LUMS, there are rumours about the internal politics being the cause of his or her departure. The number of students at the university who have a beard or wear an abaya has increased considerably. I asked Sadaf if “Islamic revivalist” movements like Al-Huda were also spreading into places like LUMS.

Sadaf was conscious of the fact that the display of Islamic religiosity in the university was on the rise, much like it was in general Pakistani society, but she was not sure if that could be attributed to any particular religious movement.

“I sometimes receive emails from students saying that they cannot study Anthropology of Religion. ‘Our faith is not strong enough at this stage,’ is what they say,” she told me. “Study of anthropology allows one to understand concepts from different perspectives. It means recognising that different people have different truths. This, some students feel, will undermine their faith.”

I asked Sadaf if the women who were attracted to Al-Huda and were critical of shrine culture were aware of the cultural and philosophical underpinnings of these shrines.

“No,” she said. “They criticise the rituals and rites at these shrines but beyond that they have little understanding of its culture. Most of the women who had joined Al-Huda at the time I studied them were those who had a disconnect with the local traditions. They respected the saints but were also apologetic about them. ‘The saints did what they did because of the conditions prevalent at that time’ is a common argument they give.

It is said, for example, that Muslim Sufis had to turn to qawwalis to attract Hindus who enjoyed bhajans. On the other hand, it is interesting to note that women who come from backgrounds imbued in Barelvi ethos are not easily attracted to this movement.”

“This means, according to them, that there is no longer any need to practise that form of Islam because there aren’t any Hindus around,” I added.

“At the classes the women are instructed about Islamic culture and ethos that is not indigenous but Arabic in essence. Local cultural practices like Basant or Mehndi are looked down upon and discouraged. Particularly, attention is given to da’wa [preaching of Islam] and dars. Women who are trained at this institution take up an active role in spreading their messages within their communities and societies through dars.

“One of the main reasons behind the success of the movement is the religious background of its students. Most of the women who come to Al-Huda already have faith in Islam by virtue of growing up in a Muslim household and nation and also being educated in an Islamised education system. What they don’t have is scriptural knowledge, which is then provided to them through their study of Islam at Al-Huda.

“Even though Al-Huda claims that it doesn’t adhere to any particular school of thought, their interpretation of Islam is similar to the Ahle-Hadith strand. They thus propagate a particular understanding of Islam as ‘true’ Islam and that is how it is perceived by its students who have no access to alternate approaches to Islamic scriptural knowledge. Another key reason why Al-Huda is successful in spreading its understanding of Islam among middle-class women is that its approach resonates with the kind of women who come to the school to study Islam.

“The middle class values education and as such they lean towards an institute that offers scriptural knowledge [as opposed to leaning towards a religious group which focuses on traditional rituals]. Their reason for deeming the Islamic discourse that they are exposed to as authoritative is not just related to their lack of alternative scriptural knowledge but also because they deem Farhat Hashmi, who began the school, to be a religious authority.

“Farhat Hashmi has a PhD in Hadith Sciences from Glasgow and heavily relies upon scientic concepts and logic to explain her religious arguments. Such credentials and such an approach resonate in a class that values education and science, and enhances the credibility of the school and subsequently its message.”

Sadaf explained that Al-Huda’s proselytising takes place in a faith-based framework that is already extant in Pakistani society through its politics and educational system. Here at the school, for the first time, these women study primary texts and understand them literally. I told her about the shrine of Baba Naulakha where the visitors who are generally uneducated are made to believe that the natural marks on the rocks are miraculous names of God and the Prophet, and thus sacred.

“For an educated mind, such a tradition would be difficult to absorb,” I commented.

“Faith or belief has little to do with education. But certainly, the fact that Al-Huda is making inroads into the elite class of the society and is able to spread a particular understanding of Islam within it, is significantly due to the fact that no other spiritual movement has been able to provide an avenue for the educated class to explore the scriptural texts in a manner that resonates with them,” Sadaf replied.

“When a puritanical religious approach becomes the dominant school of thought, could it be said then that Pakistani society would eventually become an extremist state in terms of its politics?” I asked.

“Al-Huda claims that it is an apolitical organisation and strictly forbids political discussions in its classrooms. ‘Focus on becoming better Muslims’, is what the teachers tell their students who wish to discuss political matters. They also strongly discourage participation in political rallies. So they essentially have a bottom-up approach: they train the women who Islamise the environment in their households and neighbourhoods. This eventually would create an environment in which the implementation of Sharia would be the next logical step.”

“When that happens I will grow a beard and you can wear a burqa to fit in,” I joked with her. “That would be the time to leave the country,” she replied with a straight face.

“In this growing environment of religious puritanism, how do you think these shrines are likely to fare in the future? Would shrine culture eventually end?” I asked her.

“I don’t know. I think for shrine culture to end, things would have to become much worse than they are right now, and stay that way for a considerably long period of time. This is because shrine culture is so deeply embedded in our society that it would be hard to remove it. In order to get rid of it, the next generation needs to internalise the concept that it is wrong and unIslamic. On the other hand, you can also see that there is resurgence in the interest in Sufi poetry and music. Admittedly this section of society is still a minority and for it to have any serious impact it needs to grow in size. But that is where hope lies,” Sadaf said.

“Oh my God, Haroon. If you were at the session you would have killed her,” my sister told me at the end of the three-hour long dars. “She said that the youth of our country have strayed away from our culture. They mimic the West or India by celebrating Valentine’s Day or Basant. These festivals have nothing to do with our culture and also that women should not work because their incomes bring ill-fate to a household.”

“You don’t know how I controlled myself,” Anam told me.

“I thought the session was nice,” said Uzma, my sister’s friend. She has done her Master’s in Journalism from a leading women’s college of the country and is now a housewife. “Some of the things she said were informative.”

“How can she even say it is unIslamic for women to work?” I asked. “What about Hazrat Khadijah, the first wife of the Prophet? Wasn’t she a businesswoman? She can only impress people who don’t know history or culture. What ‘our’ culture is she talking about? Isn’t Heer Ranjha part of Punjabi culture? It is the most celebrated folk story here. For centuries it has been sung and dramatised. It is essentially a celebration of love. How is it any different from the celebration of Valentine’s Day? In fact, the celebration of Heer Ranjha’s love is much more profound than Valentine’s Day. In our culture it has taken metaphysical dimensions, by becoming part of the folk religion. We worship love, not only celebrate it.”

Excerpted with permission fromIn Search of Shiva: A Study of Folk Religious Practices in Pakistan, Haroon Khalid, Rupa Books.
There is an Islamic revival everywhere.
 
Back
Top Bottom