TMA
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2015
- Messages
- 4,425
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
So the Pakistani family members have a choice. They either stay here or go with their Afghan family member. It is a very hard choice. But unless they were forced into the marriage....Just imagine if a Pakistan man committed a crime and he received the 30 years on prison or the death penalty... what about his family members, won't their family life be destroyed? Now you can argue that being a refugee is not a crime...and I would say as long as it was within the framework of Pakistani law yes...but remember a refugee is not a legal resident, he is meant to return to his homeland.Right...I'm not worried about what the world would say...I know that their stay was to be temporary...and had it been JUST AFGHANS...I would say no problem...send them all back.
My argument is for the Pakistanis...those Afghans who are not found to be against Pak(not involved in anti Pak activities)...and have Pakistani families(spouses/children)...if they are sent back...
What are we to do with their Pakistani family members? Hold their Pakistani family members back in Pakistan and tear apart families? Or send these Pakistanis to Afghanistan(which u say is safe according to India)?
Obviously any Afghan(whether refugee or illegal immigrant), if he/she has no Pakistani family members should be sent back right away...but it's a little more complicated in case of those who have families here.
The complexities like marriage, family, etc. are there whether we like it or not. They are not a separate issue and have to be addressed when deporting someone out of the country. Which option would u pick? Would u only send back Afghanis and hold back their Pakistani family members? Or would u also send their Pakistani family members to Afghanistan?
Above all else one must cast aside individual sympathies...of course it is in the interests of Afghans to get citizenship. I do not blame them. But is it in the interests of Pakistan to acquiesce? My answer is a NO. (Of course there are exceptions but they are exactly that, exceptions). Of course being given a legal status like legal resident is much better than citizenship and much better than an illegal refugee.
Even if that Afghan who was born and bred in Pakistan but in the case of a border skirmish is with Afghanistan?Anyone who lives in Pakistan for 10 years... should get citizenship.
Those born in Pakistan, if lived 5 years should be given citizenship.
Those Afghans, whom Zardari regime imported and even gave them ID cards during his rule, such Afghans should be arrested along with Zardari and Rehman Malik.
Length of stay or birth place is not a marker for loyalty. Look at Pakistanis! Why add to this burden of giving Afghan refugees citizenship?