Peshwa
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
- Messages
- 4,918
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
I have posted the picture of the only Irani document he had now accept it or not he will be hanged. So stop crying and get a life. The Indian Gov has no balls to save their own agent why are you putting out your frustration on Pakistan. Go and protest in front of Modi.
Oh how the cowards scurry from battle..
What was all this bravado for then? LOL
Boy he was caught with an Irani passport not Indian. Pakistan and Iran have a treaty of executing Baloch terrorists and Jadhav falls under that treaty. If Iran catches a Baloch terrorist trying to disrupt Irani interests Iran can do what ever Iran wants with him and If Pakistan catches a Irani Baloch terrorist Pakistan can do what ever Pakistan wants. Jadhav is a Baloch terrorist from the Irani side of the border and Pakistan can hang him without any restriction. Call the Irani ambassador to India and protest in front of him not on PDF.
What you should be worried about is the U turn your politicians and army are contemplating as we speak. I will be here to shove egg on your face! Watch this space!
and where does that article says that field court martial is not a proper court? infact it was a norm in world war 2 and nearly all subsequent wars... this is how spies are dealt with
"Article 30 is extended thus:The Convention contains several provisions in this respect which extend the principle and make it precise. Thus Article 3 prohibits "the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples".Article 3 although it applies only to armed conflicts not of an international character, contains rules of absolutely general application. The prohibition mentioned is, moreover, confirmed by Article 5 and Articles 64-76.It should also be noted that paragraph 2 of Article 68
authorizes the Occupying Power under certain conditions to inflict the death penalty on protected persons found guilty of espionage."
Please learn to read. The article above describes precisely (see the use of the word in the above highlighted).
Where are the "regualarly constituted courts"? Where is judicial guarantee? Who was even defending Jadhav in court?
So what it doesn't give you is an option outside of this manner of dealing with spies. Field court martial is not an option.
Why don't you show me where a secret military court ruling and exceptions to it in the Geneva convention are mentioned? I'm all ears.