Looking at the balance of power right now, its quite clear that there is going to be destruction on both sides. PAF is a fast and agile force; within minutes PAF can launch sorties and fire cruise missiles, PGM's and long range precision guided glide bombs. Similarly, India can manage to do the same too. Even with all this modernization, IAF is equally vulnerable today as it was 40 years ago. If they were not, believe me their posture would have been a lot more different and very confrontational.
Ahahahahhhhahhahhha
This post reminds me of the statement that your AVM made after the Mumbai attacks. "We have 5000 targets earmarked in Pakistan and our adversary fears our power".
How about you guys put your words into action and actually follow this up by actions instead of words. Feel free to cross the border and we will see who survives

. IAF did try to act naughty Post Mumbai, but we all know the results of that and they didn't dare repeat that mistake again.
There are routine IAF aircraft incursions over Pakistan. In 2008, an Su-30MKI and
a Mirage-2000 came right into the Lahore sector, back in 1997, MiG-25s used to fly
freely over Islamabad. I don't think PAF has acruired the capability to detect enemy aircraft
movements before they intrude well into Pak territory, just imagine what if they were
equipped with air-dropped nukes, Lahore & Islamabad will be reduced to ashes even
before you can detect what ac came over your land. Where were your Erieyes sleeping?
The BrahMos is an a exceptional weapon to take out PAF airbases first thing in war, this
is massively cut down Pak ac sortie rates and air operations close to Indian border will take
a massive beating, there are close to 200 Block-II PJ-10s deployed near the Pak border
alone, and they can strike even Islamabad giving you the least possible reaction time
of any operational land-attack cruise missile in the world.
I think you need to stop living in the 1960s and 1970s. A lot has changed now. Back then
PAF had qualitative superiority over IAF and you also recieved the best search radars and
stuff from US, while IAF had poor capabilities in these aspects.
In 2012 of today, you have lost the qualitative superiority as well. IAF has not just numbers
but operates Asia's best operational jet fighter after Su-35S. Which is all set to become
more lethal. IAF pilot's training levels have vastly improved, and so have our tactics
and equipment. And secondly, PAF has completely lost the capability to carry out an
effective offensive against IAF without losing their whole air force.
And would you plz take the trouble of explaining to me how an air force can survive
if it keeps on sticking to the same level of battlefield effectiveness with their
aircraft for decades while the opponents are vastly increasing they're numbers as
well as strategic versatility of striking hard and striking deep day by day?