What's new

All patriotic Indians will reject such a subordinate role to US imperialism : CPM

It is unlikely India would say no.


In order for India to use US bases in non-US territory, they'd require the permission of the host government, rendering this deal even more worthless.


Pakistan isn't so much worried about the US base in India, it is worried that the US is enabling India to continue destabilizing Pakistan.
Thats your opinion not fact.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...ses-manohar-parrikar/articleshow/53919182.cms
Logistics pact with US not for bases: Manohar Parrikar
By Manu Pubby, ET Bureau | Aug 30, 2016, 01.35 AM IST
Post a Comment
READ MORE ON » US | ogistic exchange pact | Manohar Parrikar | LEMOA | Defence Minister | Ashton Carter | India
india-us-sign-logistic-exchange-pact-boosting-defence-ties.jpg

LEMOA facilitates the provision of logistical support, supplies, and services between the US and Indian militaries on a reimbursable basis, and provides a framework to govern them.
NEW DELHI: Defence minister Manohar Parrikar has said that the pact India signed for sharing military logistics with the US was not an agreement for America to set up bases here, dispelling doubts raised by the Opposition that it would hamper strategic autonomy.

He was speaking in Washington after signing the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (Lemoa), signed after over a decade of discussion. The pact facilitates provision of supplies like fuel, spare parts, medical assistance and food to visiting warships, aircraft or personnel from either country but does not provide for permanent or even temporary basing facilities.
 
Khizr you started trolling from post 1.




But he is right. US needs us to control the fallout ......
We tell our points of view, may be wrong may be correct.
We all Members of PDF can't play any role in the politics of the world but can show our point of view and share to each others.
I will say the crow is white,
You will say it is black.
We both will prove our points of view.
I always try to comment according to title,not to Kashhmir or kargil in every title.
 
We tell our points of view, may be wrong may be correct.
We all Members of PDF can't play any role in the politics of the world but can show our point of view and share to each others.
I will say the crow is white,
You will say it is black.
We both will prove our points of view.
I always try to comment according to title,not to Kashhmir or kargil in every title.


Yes, do that. Dont troll and then tell others that they are indulging in it. You trolled saying battle in soil or something.
 
It is unlikely India would say no.


In order for India to use US bases in non-US territory, they'd require the permission of the host government, rendering this deal even more worthless.


Pakistan isn't so much worried about the US base in India, it is worried that the US is enabling India to continue destabilizing Pakistan.

Question is when your country was stable...??... Till date most of the time of your country spent under dictatorship...no proper Democracy ...not even it was ever respected... You are using terrorism as a strategic asset... You are defining terrorist as Good and Bad Terrorist....Try to calculate honestly from 70+ years what your country did....?
 
To 'manage' the security aspects for ourselves and the region as a whole.

Region.... fine.......... But do we need external support to "manage" our security aspects???
 
India is going 10 countries such as asam, nagaland, Aronchal perdesh is the part of China, North and south India, Kashmir is the part of Pakistan,East Punjab is coming to Pakistan,The Indian Muslim will demand for their own Muslim country,The history of USSR is repeat once again.

Would you consider changing your user name to Nostradamus ?
 
Posting the Editorial from the Hindu......

The signing of the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA)during Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar’s visit to Washington is a significant step forward for India and the U.S. The agreement, which comes after more than a decade of negotiations, puts an automatic approvals process in place for the two militaries to share each other’s bases for various operations. These include port visits, joint exercises, joint training, and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts; other uses are to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. The agreement will aid the sort of operations India has undertaken to rescue stranded Indians in conflict zones. Further, as the Indian military continues to expand its role to aid in disaster relief, as it did during the 2004 tsunami, it will benefit from easier access to America’s network of military bases around the world. The pact will also enhance the military’s capability to be an expeditionary force, at a time when Indian interests are distributed around the world with major investments planned both onshore and offshore in oilfields. The U.S., too, has required the help of India, as it did when emergency planes were refuelled in Delhi during the Nepal earthquake relief operation. As India and the U.S. explore plans for maritime cooperation in the Asia-Pacific as a part of the joint vision statement, LEMOA is going to add value.


LEMOA is not without its drawbacks, however, as is evident from the fact that it took so many years to agree upon. Even after the Centre had cleared the “foundational agreement”, as it is known, it took several months and at least four high-level meetings to finalise the text. A major reason for this was that although India embarked on closer defence ties with the U.S. years ago, there was no consensus or support within the establishment for an alliance of any kind, which the LEMOA had come to symbolise. As Mr. Parrikar pointed out during his joint appearance with U.S. Defence Secretary Ashton Carter, the finally negotiated text has nothing to do with setting up U.S. bases in India, and there is no “obligation” on either side to carry out any joint activity. Mr. Parrikar also mentioned a need to explain to the people the import of the agreement by bringing it into the public domain before the government considers discussions on the other foundational agreements the U.S. is keen to draw India into. The caution from Mr. Parrikar shows a nuanced understanding of the benefits and reservations about the Centre’s latest move, which is a welcome trend.
 
Why are patriotic Chinese (CPM) talking about Indian patriotism
 
Posting the Editorial from the Hindu......

The signing of the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA)during Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar’s visit to Washington is a significant step forward for India and the U.S. The agreement, which comes after more than a decade of negotiations, puts an automatic approvals process in place for the two militaries to share each other’s bases for various operations. These include port visits, joint exercises, joint training, and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts; other uses are to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. The agreement will aid the sort of operations India has undertaken to rescue stranded Indians in conflict zones. Further, as the Indian military continues to expand its role to aid in disaster relief, as it did during the 2004 tsunami, it will benefit from easier access to America’s network of military bases around the world. The pact will also enhance the military’s capability to be an expeditionary force, at a time when Indian interests are distributed around the world with major investments planned both onshore and offshore in oilfields. The U.S., too, has required the help of India, as it did when emergency planes were refuelled in Delhi during the Nepal earthquake relief operation. As India and the U.S. explore plans for maritime cooperation in the Asia-Pacific as a part of the joint vision statement, LEMOA is going to add value.


LEMOA is not without its drawbacks, however, as is evident from the fact that it took so many years to agree upon. Even after the Centre had cleared the “foundational agreement”, as it is known, it took several months and at least four high-level meetings to finalise the text. A major reason for this was that although India embarked on closer defence ties with the U.S. years ago, there was no consensus or support within the establishment for an alliance of any kind, which the LEMOA had come to symbolise. As Mr. Parrikar pointed out during his joint appearance with U.S. Defence Secretary Ashton Carter, the finally negotiated text has nothing to do with setting up U.S. bases in India, and there is no “obligation” on either side to carry out any joint activity. Mr. Parrikar also mentioned a need to explain to the people the import of the agreement by bringing it into the public domain before the government considers discussions on the other foundational agreements the U.S. is keen to draw India into. The caution from Mr. Parrikar shows a nuanced understanding of the benefits and reservations about the Centre’s latest move, which is a welcome trend.
People Only Talking about Bases
The Term used by Legal document is Assets as As Well

If People Actually Know what Assets are stand In Technical terms in International Document
:disagree:
 
It is unlikely India would say no.


In order for India to use US bases in non-US territory, they'd require the permission of the host government, rendering this deal even more worthless.


Pakistan isn't so much worried about the US base in India, it is worried that the US is enabling India to continue destabilizing Pakistan.


There will not be even a single US soldier on Indian bases. Its not possible. When India was USSR's ally we did not allow that, not now not in 1000 years. US ha already bases in Pakistan why they need other countries? If they want they can have another abottabad, thats it.
 
Ignoring the message itself, the deal really is bad for India.

It is unlikely that India would ever use US bases, at least not for the next few decades, while the US not only immediately gets to use Indian bases, but use it to keep its current strategic interests going in the region. The main benefactor here is the US; India got a really bad deal.

Don't be surprised to see Su-30's operating out of Bagram Air Base in the near future.
 
Don't be surprised to see Su-30's operating out of Bagram Air Base in the near future.

Why Su-30? I say, send some of our old Mig 23s over to the Afghan Air Force. Not to mention post a few 'trainer' aircraft.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom