All new CX-1 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) - Chinese Answer to Brahmos

[Akasa]

Hi, Henri K. Can you provide further information regarding the YJ-18? Is it based off the Klub? Is it supersonic? Is it a stealthy missile? Does it have the 400-600 km range as some PLAN sailors claim?

I am asking you since you seem the most informed regarding these matters. Thanks in advance!

 

[GR!FF!N]

You mean you who come into Chinese thread to bit$h about your sourgrape indian cheap non competitive product?

Another expertise by Indian troll is they always like to slander others of things which is a perfect description of themselves.

Non Competitive Product???

Brahmos----> Operational

CX-1-----> a mock up for now.let make it kid,then test.them compare it with operational one.

 

[S10]

except US, tell me china has slower sea skimming missiles, other than their old YJ-62, YJ-82, YJ-8 and their short ranged one, their all strategic ASCM is supersonic

China has had supersonic anti-ship missiles since the 1980's. It's in parallel development the the subsonic missiles. It was never adopted. The disadvantage of these missiles greatly outweighs their benefits.

 

[GR!FF!N]

About an year ago, I had read a US congress report that DF 21 is far away from being operational. JL was to get IOC by 2013. Chinese are giving impression that they are operational for a long time.

that was DF-21D.I was talking about DF-21 provided to SA by China.and IRBM export is completely against MTCR.but then again,PRC doesn't care about MTCR.

 

[HariPrasad]

that was DF-21D.I was talking about DF-21 provided to SA by China.and IRBM export is completely against MTCR.but then again,PRC doesn't care about MTCR.

Ok I am talking about anti ship version.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Ok I am talking about anti ship version.

ASBM is still no good.multiple countries tried it and found ASCM is far more applicable than ASBM.the reason,enemy can't distinguish it from a Nuclear Armed Missile and may strike accordingly.China never faced Missile Crisis like US and Soviets did.thats why they didn't take this approach.plus,in current position,US is armed with SM-2 and SM-3 can intercept ballistic missiles.but a supersonic ASHM is still a tough nut to crack.

 

[feilong]

Russia going to sell the blueprints of bra bonker(brahmos) to Vietcong soon, Putin shook hands with Vietnamese prime minister and they agrees to built brahmos version. So now Indian eggo will go bonker soon, even brahmos Vietcong won't buy from Indian.

 

[Beast]

that was DF-21D.I was talking about DF-21 provided to SA by China.and IRBM export is completely against MTCR.but then again,PRC doesn't care about MTCR.

Yes yes, US sold trident ICBM to UK. Since you are so against violator of MTCR perhaps you indian shall not buy any more P-8 from US since they don't care about MTCR too.

 

[Akasa]

Non Competitive Product???

Brahmos----> Operational

CX-1-----> a mock up for now.let make it kid,then test.them compare it with operational one.

The video posted above shows the missile undergoing tests.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Yes yes, US sold trident ICBM to UK. Since you are so against violator of MTCR perhaps you indian shall not buy any more P-8 from US since they don't care about MTCR too.

USA sold Trident before MTCR came into effect.but that doesn't apply for China as the reason below....

1994: On 4 October, the United States and China issued a joint statement on "missile proliferation." The United States agreed to lift sanctions imposed on China (in August 1993) for missile exports to Pakistan. Once sanctions were lifted, China agreed not to export missiles "featuring the primary parameters of the MTCR." This Chinese commitment, according to the statement, goes beyond the MTCR's "strong presumption of denial" language. China also agreed to the US formulation on "inherent capability," that is, any missile capable of generating "sufficient energy to deliver a 500 kg payload at least 300 km, regardless of its demonstrated or advertised combination of range and payload."

Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) | Treaties & Regimes | NTI

 

[GR!FF!N]

The video posted above shows the missile undergoing tests.

what video my friend??

 

[Akasa]

what video my friend??

Post #6469645, courtesy of Navyrecognition

 

[GR!FF!N]

Post #6469645, courtesy of Navyrecognition

any chance you could post it here???

 

[Akasa]

any chance you could post it here???

Will do later; currently using smartphone.

 

[Abhishek Das]

If Cx-1 is better than Brahmos & if China has deployed their CM-400 AKG wrecker having a so called speed of Mach-5.5 but actually the speed is slightly higher than Mach-3, still then India don't feel worry because we are developing hypersonick version of Brahmos-2 with a speed of Mach-7 above, it has already achieved the speed of Mach-6.5 in the labratory in India where it is under-development, DRDO & Russian counterparts are working together to lift-up its speed more than Mach-7 or almost Mach-10..........this time India is investing heavily on this version of Brahmos from all type of Cyber Hackings by which China have stolen the design & partial technology of Brahmos-1 missile to make their own version of Brahmos-Copy "CX-1".......!!!!!