Alauddin Khilji item number

[AshishDelhi]

Why blame baniya, they were not the one who wrote this fiction, blame Mohammed Jaysi who originally wrote this story named Padmavat, Hindu presented him like story told.

Hindu hate us more then any other cult,its in holy Quran that Jews and pagan are most hostile toward Islam.. but they are not responsible here, its Muhammad jayasi..

AlQuran 5:82

"Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the believers wilt thou find those who say, "We are Christians": because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant."

Sabse zyada tumhari Christian hee maar rahe hai...look up a drone

 

[Mrc]

Khilji was a great and simple person loved by common folk and ranis alike... even.on opposing sides....

 

[Max]

Sabse zyada tumhari Christian hee maar rahe hai...look up a drone

Christian are not blind in their religious hatred, the current hate in west is driven by zionist media and lobbies most notably Evangelists who worship Israel and zionists and hate Islam like pagans. Moreover Quran is not saying that all of them are lovey dovey toward Islam. Quran is saying amongst them you can find more reasonable people with good attitude towards you then other groups.

Quran 5:82

"Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the believers wilt thou find those who say, "We are Christians": because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant."

 

[Ocean]

enjoy

I watched it again for comedy. Its such a comedy song it gives fits of laughter.

@lastofthepatriots incase u missed

 

[Kambojaric]

 

[Kabira]

I watched it again for comedy. Its such a comedy song it gives fits of laughter.

@lastofthepatriots incase u missed

Yes its awesome. maja agheya

 

[My-Analogous]

Dont know why Pakistanis r so much concerned about alauddin khilji image. Alauddin khilji's ancestors r Turkic tribe,he has nothing to do with present day Pakistanis.

Something beyond your mental caliber

 

[Ajaxpaul]

The movie shows how much hate and anger the hindu has for Islam.

Yeah, only.indian muslims saw the film...Hindus just sat in a corner sulking.

 

[Kabira]

your theory is so twisted and factually wrong.

Explain how?

This movie glorify sati and slavery of dalits by rajasthan king who was defeated by great Khilji.

 

[Ocean]

The guy who is playing Khilji in the film

@Kabira

Kheekhee

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

Khilji was an innovative administrative and military genius.Many of his reforms particularly in the price control and standing army maintainence were copied by akbar and sher shah centuries later.He defeated the ilkhanate mongols.
These were admirable parts of his character.

Negative traits -
Completely unscrupulous tyrant and pervert.Abducted/raped women at will.Killed his own uncle to get the throne.Left Zafar khan,his best general - the one who contributed most to defeating the mongols to die because he was becoming too popular.Slaughtered any of the ulema that dared even speak to him of wrongdoing.He didn't need any support from religious people because he was military despot.Reduced the farmers to poverty with crushing 50% land revenue to support his army.On purpose imposed huge dues on hindu zamindars and village headmen so that they never had resources to rebel(this worked during his reign,but empire rapidly disintegrated after his death with rebellions).Caused widespread loot and destruction in his raids of south india.Engaged in bachabaazi/homosexual paedophillia with eunuchs/mailk kafur and other slaves.Went partially insane during the last years of his reign.

The conquest of mewar and this padmini story has no long term historical significance,mewar was back in sisodia hands(ratan singh's nephew hammir) by the time of alauddin's successor and actually mewar's period of ascendance was about to begin under hammir and then kumbha who built the tower of victory .Idon't think the padmini tale is entirely false,there is no smoke without fire -why would a 15 th century muslim historian write such a story out of nowhere - he said his sources were local ballads of rajputana which generally derive from some history highly romanticized.Padmini could have been part of the equation,but also highly likely that alauddin after his conquest of gujarat felt necessary to control the trade routes going from delhi and the gangetic valley to the great ports of western india through rajputana which were at the mercy of the rajputs(mewar being the most prominent kingdom),very similar to akbar's advance into rajputana after his coquest of gujarat early in his reign.

 

[Mirzah]

The movie shows how much hate and anger the hindu has for Islam.

There is a reason for this jealousy lol

Alauddin invaded, conquered and plundered the Hindu kingdoms of Gujarat (raided in 1299 and annexed in 1304), Ranthambore (1301), Chittor (1303), Malwa (1305), Siwana (1308), and Jalore (1311). These victories ended several Hindu dynasties, including the Paramaras, the Vaghelas, the Chahamanas of Ranastambhapura and Jalore, the Rawal branch of the Guhilas, and possibly the Yajvapalas. His slave-general Malik Kafur led multiple campaigns to the south of the Vindhyas, obtaining a considerable amount of wealth from Devagiri (1308), Warangal (1310) and Dwarasamudra (1311). These victories forced the Yadava king Ramachandra, the Kakatiya king Prataparudra, and the Hoysalaking Ballala III to become Alauddin's tributaries. Kafur also raided the Pandya kingdom (1311), obtaining a large number of treasures, elephants and horses.

 

[Kabira]

Khilji was an innovative administrative and military genius.Many of his reforms particularly in the price control and standing army maintainence were copied by akbar and sher shah centuries later.He defeated the ilkhanate mongols.
These were admirable parts of his character.

Negative traits -
Completely unscrupulous tyrant and pervert.Abducted/raped women at will.Killed his own uncle to get the throne.Left Zafar khan,his best general - the one who contributed most to defeating the mongols to die because he was becoming too popular.Slaughtered any of the ulema that dared even speak to him of wrongdoing.He didn't need any support from religious people because he was military despot.Reduced the farmers to poverty with crushing 50% land revenue to support his army.On purpose imposed huge dues on hindu zamindars and village headmen so that they never had resources to rebel(this worked during his reign,but empire rapidly disintegrated after his death with rebellions).Caused widespread loot and destruction in his raids of south india.Engaged in bachabaazi/homosexual paedophillia with eunuchs/mailk kafur and other slaves.Went partially insane during the last years of his reign.

The conquest of mewar and this padmini story has no long term historical significance,mewar was back in sisodia hands(ratan singh's nephew hammir) by the time of alauddin's successor and actually mewar's period of ascendance was about to begin under hammir and then kumbha who built the tower of victory .Idon't think the padmini tale is entirely false,there is no smoke without fire -why would a 15 th century muslim historian write such a story out of nowhere - he said his sources were local ballads of rajputana which generally derive from some history highly romanticized.Padmini could have been part of the equation,but also highly likely that alauddin after his conquest of gujarat felt necessary to control the trade routes going from delhi and the gangetic valley to the great ports of western india through rajputana which were at the mercy of the rajputs(mewar being the most prominent kingdom),very similar to akbar's advance into rajputana after his coquest of gujarat early in his reign.

Your list of negative traits have no basis in history and is just hindutva propaganda. For example millions dalits celebrate defeating Peshwas in real life today.

http://indianexpress.com/article/re...-maratha-peshwa-maharashtra-protests-5010172/

Same is the case here, Khilji freed dalits of Rajasthan after defeating rajput king. He also saved women from sati which is glorified in this movie. Remember rajput king was foreign indo-aryan elite and for native Indian dalits he was another cruel king.

 

[Mentee]

Khilji was an innovative administrative and military genius.Many of his reforms particularly in the price control and standing army maintainence were copied by akbar and sher shah centuries later.He defeated the ilkhanate mongols.
These were admirable parts of his character.

Negative traits -
Completely unscrupulous tyrant and pervert.Abducted/raped women at will.Killed his own uncle to get the throne.Left Zafar khan,his best general - the one who contributed most to defeating the mongols to die because he was becoming too popular.Slaughtered any of the ulema that dared even speak to him of wrongdoing.He didn't need any support from religious people because he was military despot.Reduced the farmers to poverty with crushing 50% land revenue to support his army.On purpose imposed huge dues on hindu zamindars and village headmen so that they never had resources to rebel(this worked during his reign,but empire rapidly disintegrated after his death with rebellions).Caused widespread loot and destruction in his raids of south india.Engaged in bachabaazi/homosexual paedophillia with eunuchs/mailk kafur and other slaves.Went partially insane during the last years of his reign.

The conquest of mewar and this padmini story has no long term historical significance,mewar was back in sisodia hands(ratan singh's nephew hammir) by the time of alauddin's successor and actually mewar's period of ascendance was about to begin under hammir and then kumbha who built the tower of victory .Idon't think the padmini tale is entirely false,there is no smoke without fire -why would a 15 th century muslim historian write such a story out of nowhere - he said his sources were local ballads of rajputana which generally derive from some history highly romanticized.Padmini could have been part of the equation,but also highly likely that alauddin after his conquest of gujarat felt necessary to control the trade routes going from delhi and the gangetic valley to the great ports of western india through rajputana which were at the mercy of the rajputs(mewar being the most prominent kingdom),very similar to akbar's advance into rajputana after his coquest of gujarat early in his reign.

Alaudin gets all the blame due to him being an alien to that region and a follower of a different religion. Otherwise many locals rajas were indulging In the vices you listed above. And this is what you could expect form a king - - - - - - -.

 

[lastofthepatriots]

Is this a joke?