What's new

Al-Qaeda claims responsibility of Bhutto's assassination

TV news says that Pakistani home ministry is saying that she did not suffer any gun shots. The death was due to hitting the head with the car!

watch it with open eyes im listening the press conferenc is still going on and it was said that she suffered gun shots and only if she did not popped up her neck like idiots she might not met that fate
 
AM, I have seen enough of you to know that you don't get into personal attacks.

You and Neo are the reason, I came to this forum from WAB.
 
watch it with open eyes im listening the press conferenc is still going on and it was said that she suffered gun shots and only if she did not popped up her neck like idiots she might not met that fate

Jana, I guess you are right about her ignoring security concerns while doing this.

This happens all the time with Indian politicians too, where they want to get near the public, shaking hands et al., giving sleepless nights to the security agencies.

Guess it is difficult for the politicians to remain isolated from their supporters. You may call them stupid, but they do it to get close to the masses.
 
I saw the press conference and the gentleman clearly said that there was no bullet hit on Benazir. He explained stuff about left and right side of the head.
 
Is Sri Lanka not part of South Asia now, or only when it suits you?

He was a Hindu suicide bomber who assasinated a Hindu leader of South Asia, the parrallels can be drawn.

We are talking of India.

The Sri Lankan bomber was not an Indian.

Unlike you, who is so narrow minded, where religion is the be all and end all of all issues, we are not. Whether the terrorist was a Hindu, Christian or a pagan, it matters not. What matters is that she was a suicide bomber and a scourge on civilised society.

When will you understand that we are not brainwashed in religious jiggery pokery to identify everything in terms of religion.

I am astounded that religion is brought in for everything that you all have to say.

Leave religion where it belongs.

Look at issues bareboned with practicality.

Religion is a private thing and not a flag to be flaunted in public as a badge of all cure.



I was thinking of the Sheikh Hasina attacks.

And she was killed?



Please Salim :cheesy: There is no flag that a covert terrorist organization would plant in the ground to give themselves a base be it along the Durand Line or anywhere. They would have been flattened if not by the Pak forces, by the B52s on sight. They rely on stealth, not on bases or "strongholds".

True. No flags are planted.

But then the terrorists who a plaguing Pakistan are also not planting flags on Pakistani roads to declare it is there ground! Did the terrorist who killed Benazir fly a flag and said it was his ground?

Give some tangible arguments and not go off the handle.



I agree the elections have been ruined. But Bhutto was not deserving for a third opportunity in power (not to say she deserved a fate as this). Someone new, someone fresh should form the coalition with Musharraf. The best possible scenario would be like this. Musharraf should hold the majority vote, as I think he would (despite what I seem to be reading in some media outlets that PPP would have won).

If there is no elections where people can canvass openly and without fear, it will never be recognised as a fair election.

That is the whole problem!
 
I heard Imran Khan, the cricketer and politician.

He said there should be a consensus govt.

He also stated the Musharraf must immediately resign.

Given the threat to the lives of politicians, he said there would be hardly anyone who will hold rallies to canvass for votes and thus the election would not be free and fair.

It is good to say that elections be held as per schedule, but if you were a politician in such unruly circumstances, would you like to hold any rallies and give an election speech?

There has been bomb blast in SWAT and other places and things are still not under control.

The Colonels comments recently on lack of leadership are striking a chord with me. Is there no opposition leader with the basic intelligence to call for calm rather than vengeance or unrest?
As for the elections, let them do what ours do, small stage managed meetings shown on tv.
 
AM, I have seen enough of you to know that you don't get into personal attacks.

You and Neo are the reason, I came to this forum from WAB.


My appology if i did :)

and you were also right about guns shots statment my appology
 
Jana,

Can you get your hands on and post the transcript of the alleged taped conversation of Baitullah Mehsud in which he was offering congratulations on her assassination?
 
The Colonels comments recently on lack of leadership are striking a chord with me. Is there no opposition leader with the basic intelligence to call for calm rather than vengeance or unrest?
As for the elections, let them do what ours do, small stage managed meetings shown on tv.

Parihaka,

I don't blame the Pakistani politicians for what they are saying or doing or even the Pakistani public.

Unlike you all, the sub continentals are very emotional and take everything to heart. The whole thing becomes very personal.

And once the heart rules supreme, the head cannot function!

This is not unique to Pakistan. It happens in India, Nepal and even Sri Lanka.

You should see the reaction of the common man in India over this assassination. Everyone is aghast and full of sorrow!

Given the Indo Pak history, you would feel that it would be natural that Indians should gloat. But then that is not the case. The heart weeps for Pakistan and our radio and TV channels are a witness to the fact. The common man is outraged at this terrorist's action as any human being with a heart would!
 
We are talking of India.

The Sri Lankan bomber was not an Indian.

Unlike you, who is so narrow minded, where religion is the be all and end all of all issues, we are not. Whether the terrorist was a Hindu, Christian or a pagan, it matters not. What matters is that she was a suicide bomber and a scourge on civilised society.

When will you understand that we are not brainwashed in religious jiggery pokery to identify everything in terms of religion.

I am astounded that religion is brought in for everything that you all have to say.

Leave religion where it belongs.

Look at issues bareboned with practicality.

Religion is a private thing and not a flag to be flaunted in public as a badge of all cure.

We were talking about South Asia, not just India. So why the need to point out Sri Lanka like it's some foreign place? Tamil Hindus are the same whether they're in Sri Lanka or Bangalore. The point, as I'll remind you again, is that there's no need to distinguish this attack on Bhutto from the ones on Hasina or on Gandhi in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, or wherever else in South Asia.

And I don't quite get who you're calling a religious fanatic here. If it's me, then I sure am glad to learn something new about myself. If it's Pakistan as a whole I totally disagree. I believe Hindutva fanatics in India are the most radical bigots stagnating in their state of religious stupor, not only in South Asia but on the whole PLANET! One look at who the radical Indian population voted in in the mid 90s (BJP fundamentalist) is testimony to the fact that Indians are the most bigotted people on the planet. If India had any oil, or was more centrally positioned in the world geographically instead of butting out into the ocean beneath Asia, you can bet it would be Hindu fundamentalism that would be the biggest threat to world peace. And the case would be extremely easy to make against it.
 
Agno in the converesation Baitullah Mehsud is congradulating the Maulana


after salam he says

Baitullah: Kar usshoo (kam ho gaya) (had the task accompalished)

Maulana : Umbarak sha (Mubarik ho) (congradulation)

B: who done it
Maulana: our people were there.

He was mentioning the names of two boys

Bilal and Karim ( iam not sure about second name) But the maulana says

Bilal had done it.

Agno let me get it but it will take some time.
---------

But let me provide you another development.

Last night the men of Baitullah have celebrated the death of Benazir, in Bajaur Agency, they resort to festive firing.

Anothe information Govt was going to couduct a full scale operation Bajaur When yesterday this happened BB was killed by Baitullah Mehsud men
 
Baitullah Meshsud can be very much Behind and behind him much more powerful powers .
 
Baitullah Meshsud can be very much Behind and behind him much more powerful powers .

Whats the opinion on the Saudi's continuing to bankroll him, indirectly even, through funding Madrassa's? And the money from the drug trade would not be insignificant by any means.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom