What's new

Afzal khan and treachery of Shivaji

No offence but couple of temples are not worthy archivements. Certanly not compared to the ones who passed that knowledge to your kind. Good thing we were getting invaded so some of our ancestors got to your kind and made them civilized. Anyway current day 60% of Indians defecate openly compared to 18% Pakistanis. I would say you guys and Pakistanis also have alot of catching up to do with modern world. Instead of living in past non-existant glory. Because lets face it i bet 95% of population was banned to enter these temples in ancient times.

And you guys need to do even more faster then us.

You boast about foreign invaders accomplishment against your land and claim they made you civilized.But we Indians like our culture and believe our culture is more civilized than your foreign masters and we are descendants of an advanced vedic culture.
Friend that is the difference between us.
 
So, blame of murder of Ghori goes to West Punjab. :yes4:
Ghakkars of potohar were enemies of Afghans. They supported babur and then hamayun against Afghans. Sher shah suri built rohtas fort to keep eye on them, his son islam shah crushed them mercilessly. They were in good shape during mughal times , on behalf of mughals they fought many wars with turbulent afghans on other side of indus. They tried to put up resistance against afghans of abdali but were crushed and destroyed , relieving pressure from niazi pashtuns who were enemies of ghakkars. They sided with ranjeet singh against their historical enemy pashtuns/afghans.
Kayanis are ghakkars, they are in very large number in pak army.
@Nuri Natt @Multani
 
Last edited:
True Yousafzai's along with Khattak's are usually the educated city folk , yes they have left Tribalism and it is time for the rest to leave it to!
Btw population wise they are the largest now
They have not left tribal infracture. Infact khattaks are one of the most tribalistic people with tribal nationalism...remember FCR is not tribalism. Khattaks (of karak) are traditional pashtuns
yousafzai is a large tribe with varieties. Yousafzai of dir or torghar is as ferocious and traditional as those of FATA compared to those of swat, mardan and swabi. But yeat their tribal society is story of past.Yousafzais are traditional at some places but are losing some traditions in plains but at national level they are still regarded as traditional.
Nothing wrong with keeping traditionalism while getting educated. Pashtuns, no matter how much educated they are, do not give up on their langauge, culture, dress, music, traditions etc, in general. Dont tell me you are wearing pant shirts?:D
 
Ghakkars of potohar were enemies of Afghans. They supported babur and then hamayun against Afghans. Sher shah suri built rohtas fort to keep eye on them, his son islam shah crushed them mercilessly. They were in good shape during mughal times but tried to put up resistance against afghans of abdali but were crushed and destroyed , relieving pressure from niazi pashtuns who were enemies of ghakkars.
Kayanis are ghakkars, they are in very large number in pak army.
@Nuri Natt @Multani

you speak like in legends. If Ghakkars were defeated and destroyed, then how come they are still there and the strongest Muslim Rajputs of all? you speak as if Muslims are enemies of each other. Your mind set is like Dog eat Dog.

A true Afghan never speaks like you. A true Afghan is spiritual, and merciful. Niazis are now Punjabis.

you are an enemy of Pakistan and Pakistanis, and Muslims of Pakistan.
 
you speak like in legends. If Ghakkars were defeated and destroyed, then how come they are still there and the strongest Muslim Rajputs of all? you speak as if Muslims are enemies of each other. Your mind set is like Dog eat Dog.

A true Afghan never speaks like you. A true Afghan is spiritual, and merciful. Niazis are now Punjabis.

you are an enemy of Pakistan and Pakistanis, and Muslims of Pakistan.
Militarily defeated and destroyed. I didnt say afghans committed massacre of general ghakkar population.
Bareilwi sahab its you who speak in legends. Muslims spilled the blood of muslims for most of the time in subcontinent. Both mughals and afghans were hanafi muslims yet they spilled the blood of each other for two centuries.
If @Nuri Natt is to be believed, then ghakkars sided with ranjeet singh against their historical enemies pashtuns. Stop living in naseem hijazi fantasy
 
Historians agee that pashtuns original and primary abode was koh e sulieman (balochistan) , from there they expanded into present day Afghanistan in unknow time line. It is known that during mahmood ghaznavi times they were already in eastren afghanistan while of the tribe dilazak had migrated to present day KPK and were settled in malakhand division, peshawer, hazara and attock. Dilazak pashtuns were supporters of mahmud ghaznavi. So khyber pakhtunkhwa was colonized by pakhtuns one thousand years ago.

Durranis, yousafzais, kakars, mohmands eta are considered true afghans/pashtuns. While ghilzais, ghorids etc are considered assimilated ones. According to Pashtun oral history, which is passed down generations, ghiljay and lodhi were children of a pashtun lady bibi mato and prince of ghor, shah hussain ghori.

Karlanri pakhtun tribes who inhabit FATA, have unknown origins but are oldest inhabitants, aborigines.
Northren pakhtuns speak hard dialect, kheen. They modify sheen word with kheen. E.g hoshiar (clever) is modified to hokhiar. Southren pashtuns speak original sheen dialect.
Thanks Pak-one. You would be surprised to know that in kashmir there is a village of pashtuns who still speak pashto at home and have maintained their culture. There is areport about them somewhere on youtube. Also i was reading a paper and it mentioned that there is greater genetic diversity in pashtuns from the north compared to those from the south.
 
you speak like in legends. If Ghakkars were defeated and destroyed, then how come they are still there and the strongest Muslim Rajputs of all? you speak as if Muslims are enemies of each other. Your mind set is like Dog eat Dog.

A true Afghan never speaks like you. A true Afghan is spiritual, and merciful. Niazis are now Punjabis.

you are an enemy of Pakistan and Pakistanis, and Muslims of Pakistan.

History is always full of surprises and it seems even Pakistanis aren't aware of it. :laugh:
 
Thanks Pak-one. You would be surprised to know that in kashmir there is a village of pashtuns who still speak pashto at home and have maintained their culture. There is areport about them somewhere on youtube. Also i was reading a paper and it mentioned that there is greater genetic diversity in pashtuns from the north compared to those from the south.
You mean this? Khyber TV a raging hit amongst Kashmiri Pashtuns
Its very interesting, it means pashto is one of the langauges of India :)
 
What achievements what history what civilisation?.

Indus etc is not yours it belongs to people who live in it who have brought it.

Another Dravidian trying to claim This as his ha ha ha ha

ghilzai,

u have zero auqaat to say that pathan conquered this and thus we?

those are individual conquests,unko apnana hain toh kam se kam army mein toh shamil ho jaa?

yahaan baitke zabaan chalaane,kuch nahi hoga.
 
ghilzai,

u have zero auqaat to say that pathan conquered this and thus we?

those are individual conquests,unko apnana hain toh kam se kam army mein toh shamil ho jaa?

yahaan baitke zabaan chalaane,kuch nahi hoga.
Ghilzai is confused person with identity crisis. He said that he spits on afghans and dont want to associate with afghanistan. On the other hand is associating himself with ghaur here.
He is so stupid that by calling pritviraj chauhan coward and weak, he is actually reducing the wieght of shahbudin ghauri's final victory over chauhan. If ghauri got defeated in first war then it means chauhan was quite powerful.
 
Ghilzai is confused person with identity crisis. He said that he spits on afghans and dont want to associate with afghanistan. On the other hand is associating himself with ghaur here.
He is so stupid that by calling pritviraj chauhan coward and weak, he is actually reducing the wieght of shahbudin ghauri's final victory over chauhan. If ghauri got defeated in first war then it means chauhan was quite powerful.
rajputs are not rajputs anymore, nor are the pathan. New warrier race are made every so often, I dont know why we are still living in the past.
 
Ghilzai is confused person with identity crisis. He said that he spits on afghans and dont want to associate with afghanistan. On the other hand is associating himself with ghaur here.
He is so stupid that by calling pritviraj chauhan coward and weak, he is actually reducing the wieght of shahbudin ghauri's final victory over chauhan. If ghauri got defeated in first war then it means chauhan was quite powerful.

Stop living in past dude,those days are long gone.with modern training everyone is almost at same level
 
Back
Top Bottom