I think there are a few flaws in your statements/comments:
Thanks to Afghanistan and Pakistan borders, majority of drug dealers choose to come to Iran and go to Europe and rest of ME, and because of that we seize the largest amount of drugs in the world annually.
1. majority of drug dealers choose to come to Iran and go to Europe and rest of ME
--> Do you have
references to back that up -- I've never heard Iran is a bigger conduit over Pakistan
-->
Why would it be? -- the level of corruption in Pakistan exceeds Iran
--> The level of internal security in Pakistan is less compared to Iran
--> would be interested if you have references -- you may be right on this but I am skeptical
2. because of that we seize the largest amount of drugs in the world annually.
--> Again this is a false inference, your statement depends on the proposition that:
-->
more drugs caught ==> more drugs must have been shipped [sorry but wrong]
--> clearly this proposition
cannot be true for example a larger quantity shipped with poor law enforcement
--> would lead to smaller quantities seized
So you are deeply mistaken if you think you are getting more drugs compared to us. Flow of drugs is already towards Iran. It can't get worse.
3. Flow of drugs is already towards Iran. It can't get worse.
--> again this is a repeat of you you have said so again I challenge it
And btw, improving economic ties between Iran and Afghanistan doesn't mean dealers will stop drug smuggling into Pakistan, it's the opposite. The more prosperous the area gets, the less space for criminals exists.
4. Again this is simply not true in the general sense -- I mean we are not talking about Baltimore here but Afghanistan
--> As counter example:
under the Taliban the annual poppy cultivation was 9,000 hectares
--> After economic conditions improved post 9/11 --
the poppy cultivation has soared up to ~100,000 hectares
Again facts, references and sound inference please -- sound bytes just make you feel good ;-)
.
Why do you have to always spin stuff into a zero sum game, Pakistan is earning a couple billions in relation to the Afghan commerce, those may sound small to you but still its commerce.
Part A
1. Why do you have to always spin stuff into a zero sum game,
. mmm so I don't know how you arrive at this -- zero sum mean for me to win you loose
. I disagree with this completely
. For example it escapes me why Afghanistan/Pakistan are two different countries
. It would seem to me Afghans would be clamoring for a confederation with Pakistan
kinda like Turkey wants to be part of Europe -- that's not a Zero Sum Game is it.
. Now I do advocate
considering the use of all levers to get Afghans to comply
. Again operative word being
considering and not necessarily using
2. Pakistan is earning a couple billions in relation to the Afghan commerce, those may sound small to you but still its commerce.
. This may be true but Pakistan is losing orders of magnitudes more than that per year
. It's pretty simple arithmetic
3. I am referring to the fact that our region should utilize all the routes for commerce, not Either Or situation.
. I totally agree
. So for example China should become part of SAARC
. Since Pakistan is so narrow minded Afghanistan should have granted
transit to Pakistan 50 years to ago
. Funny how your laws of physics only apply to Pakistan
. I think Pakistan should apply all instruments at it;s disposal to get trade routes to CARs
. Now if they do not pass through Afghanistan ... so be it.
4. I hope that Afghans return back to Afghanistan, sooner rather than later to rebuilt their country.
. As many wise scholars of policy have said
.
Hope is not a policy
PS : You also need to take chill pill, stop responding emotional, look at the bigger picture. Seems you are a person with higher IQ but very low EQ.
Part B
1. So interestingly I would agree that I probably have lower a EQ than I should
2. On the Chill pill -- I assure you I don't remember the last time Afghanistan or an Afghan made my blood boil -- perhaps not in the past five years -- I actually sympathize with the condition of Afghans -- I just live in
Realpolitik
3. "Stop responding emotional," -- again I do not know where you get this from -- as you yourself have pointed out -- I'm rather low on emotion.
4. more on "stop responding emotional," -- you do realize I'm probably one of the older member here -- I could be 20 years your senior easily -- unless I mistake your age
5. look at the bigger picture -- what makes you think I do not do that ??
How about this: evaluate yourself on the advise you have given me. Again brains my dear, brains ... not soundbites