There should be consistency in arguments.
If the guy who wants to build a statue in Porus' memory claims that Porus was a Pakistani Punjabi hero since his(poster's) folks belong to Porus' clan, surely he cannot refute the fact that Porus was a Hindu and therefore an Indian king as several posters have already established with references that Porus was a Hindu.
Calling Porus a Pakistani is just so much humbug and with such bigotted views of history this gentleman will never get the stautue up.
Also by claiming ancestry of Porus clan, he is also rubbishing the oft heard Pakistani claim that Pakistanis are not Indians but are of Irano-Turkic-Afghano-Arab origin.
If the guy who wants to build a statue in Porus' memory claims that Porus was a Pakistani Punjabi hero since his(poster's) folks belong to Porus' clan, surely he cannot refute the fact that Porus was a Hindu and therefore an Indian king as several posters have already established with references that Porus was a Hindu.
Calling Porus a Pakistani is just so much humbug and with such bigotted views of history this gentleman will never get the stautue up.
Also by claiming ancestry of Porus clan, he is also rubbishing the oft heard Pakistani claim that Pakistanis are not Indians but are of Irano-Turkic-Afghano-Arab origin.