This ideology is happy to destroy Pakistan for its gain. It's parasitic and psychologically abuses its host where it gains control and can trigger unreasonable behavior at will. I've been studying this since 2005. I always wanted to know what was the driver for TTP sympathizers in Pakistan.
Just the other day
View attachment 798824
To be fair, I don't think that guy's last post was wrong either. From what I learned, Islam doesn't agree with Nationalism. Islam in this context should be borderless and not restricted to a country or borders.
Islam is a religion with asocial and philosophical worldview, and provides for economic and political principles. Nationalism, too, has its own social and political principles based however on different beliefs and criteria. Therefore, conflict between Islam and nationalism is inevitable. The Islamic ideology is not compatible with any other ideology on the question of sovereignty over the private and social life of Muslims. A Muslim cannot at the same time be a Muslim and a polytheist, or a Muslim and communist(like the famous leftist muslim on here
@jamahir 
). In Islam, there is no room for one to be a loyal and genuine nationalist. It is a question of identity, and one negates the other.
Nationalism is incompatible with Islam, both schools having two opposite ideologies. These two assume two totally opposite poles in their spirit, essence, direction and goal in itself to be honest.
A common ideology is the basis of the unity of the Islamic ummah, not race, country, language or even culture. The goal of nationalism is to create national units, whereas the goal of Islam is universal unity. To nationalism what matters the most is loyalty and attachment to the homeland, whereas to Islam, it is God and religion. Nationalism gives authenticity to geographical boundaries and racial distinctions, whereas Islam negates them. Nationalism inclines to limitation and race, but Islam assumes a universal outlook.
Nationalism attaches value only to the historical traditions, culture, civilization, ideas and historical figures of its own nation, but Islam's vision goes beyond the frontier, race, tribe and nation. Moses, Jesus, Muhammad and Ali are considered as belonging to all mankind. Islam wishes all nations to regard the Quran as their Book, and true leaders of Islam as their leaders. Whereas nationalism totally contradicts this. Atarurk is revered by the nationalists Turks for example but he will be (or is being) cursed by some Islamic figures(even many members on here I believe. Lol) who see him as probably anti Islamic, similarly we ca take example of nationalistic regime of Pahlavi in Iran, the creeds of Zoroastrianism and Baha'ism which were regarded as Iranian faiths, were encouraged by the regime etc.
So nationalism and Islam often clash in alot of ways. So that member might sound like an extremists but he isn't completely wrong either. It just comes across that way the modern world we live in has changed so we have to adapt to new realities and have come to accept them, doesn't means the guy is wrong though, especially if he really wants to follow his religion by the word(which isn't always realistic ).
minority with 2.6 million votes?
