Not lying smartass.
You are looking at GDP(Nominal), whereas GDP(PPP) of India is a $1000 ahead of pak, the later should be the preferred barometer for developing countries.
Oh wow, some random individual facts.
India's
HDI is better than Pakistan that should tell you about the living conditions of both our people.
Better than our soldiers?
LOL YOUR SPECIAL FORCES LOST TO OUR REGULAR INFANTRY so much for better soldiers.
That is just something your generals told your soldiers so that they would over confidently participate in their own slaughter and it seems you lot still believe it.
Get this, every other war of attrition in history has been won by a force with superior numbers, and in such wars a military with a larger force will always have more casualties that is consistent all over the world. You lot are no special either. That is just the way of the world.
You are just another kid who has been brainwashed to believe otherwise.
IN THE END VICTORY IS ALL THAT MATTERS, but Pakistanis need some consolation or they won't be able to sleep, so people like you concoct ridiculous theories about how you "
could have won" or how
"your numbers were smaller" or that
"in another parallel universe Pakistan has actually won".
You can console yourself by these notion but that's all they are, "mental masturbations".
WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO?
What we are, are a BRICS nation, with the fastest growth rate in the world projected to increase to 8%(when Pakistan lags at 4%), a $2 Trillion economy, with one of the largest military in the world, and what we are doing is slowly surrounding you with our geopolitical clout, diplomatic missions and overall money that we give to countries who oppose you and making your friends oppose you with it, coz guess what? Money does work, it always has and US' dominance is proof of this very fact.
If you weren't scared, this thread wouldn't have so many Pakistani posters replying with this much fervor, just like Bangladeshi threads don't.
THAT IS WHAT WE ARE DOING.
1965 was no stalemate.
But you won't believe an Indian so....
"The superior Indian forces, however, won a decisive victory and the army could have even marched on into Pakistani territory had external pressure not forced both combatants to cease their war efforts."---Gertjan Dijkink in National identity and geopolitical visions
"India won the war. It gained 1,840 km2 (710 sq mi) of Pakistani territory: 640 km2 (250 sq mi) in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 km2 (180 sq mi) of the Sailkot sector; 380 km2 (150 sq mi) far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 km2 (140 sq mi) on the Lahore front. Pakistan took 540 km2 (210 sq mi) of Indian territory: 490 km2 (190 sq mi) in the Chhamb sector and 50 km2 (19 sq mi) around Khem Karan."---David Van Praagh.
In 71 we did tear you into 2, Pakistan could have dominated Bangladesh and the civil war was very close to being quashed by your forces, it was not predetermined like you say. But we intervened and rest is history.
Yes you can go into denial about what happened but it won't change the fact.
Oh and wiped off more than half your population, don't forget that, almost forgot that.
Rest of your "could be", "would be", "was more", "was less" are just conjectures.
In 99 you saw an EMPTY region that had
no Indian presence(because
that is what Pak does, attack where there is no challenge) and made camp on high ground, and when IA did arrive you were trounced badly.
Again, failing the objective and losing positions, classic Pakistan.
LOL point 5353? We have all the surrounding points, what can pakistan possibly do now?
Pakistan never really won anything in Kargil. You lot infiltrated and captured some over 100 peaks when there was no Indian army presence and then lost them, one after the other and now you have only 1.
Pressured you to leave? LOL it has been years since Kargil and Pakistanis are still trying so desperately to salvage their ego.
"Pakistan's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif desperately sought US intercession to prevent an escalation by India, and requested urgent intervention by President Clinton."----
Bruce Riedel
Former White House Aide
Special Advisor, NATO, Brussels, Belgium (2003–2006)
Member, Royal College of Defence Studies, London, UK (2002–2003)
Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Near East and North African Affairs, National Security Council (2001–2002)
Special Assistant to the President, and Senior Director for Near East Affairs on the National Security Council (1997–2001)
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Near East and South Asian Affairs, Office of the Secretary of Defense (1995–1997)
National Intelligence Officer for Near East and South Asian Affairs at the National Intelligence Council (1993–95)
Director for Gulf and South Asia Affairs, National Security Council (1991–1993)
Deputy Chief Persian Gulf Task Force, Central Intelligence Agency (1990–1991)
Various assignments, Central Intelligence Agency (1977–1990)
Pakistanis being Pakistanis, you lot engaged in a low intensity skirmish and in turn have made us so strong today.
Our presence in Siachin and everywhere in Kargil has been fortified twice over.
Kashmir issue was gathering sympathy for the whole of 90s and you lot ruined it in one instant LOL.
You have gained notoriety since then and US challenges Pak everywhere, whereas we once were at the mercy of sanctions are now having US sell us military hardware and signing pacts like LEMOA and opening up the chance to sign even more military co-operation pacts.
Oh yeah, Pakistan soooooo won the 1999 war.
.
Peaceful resistance?
So our security personnel die because Kashmiri insurgents sit down and protest peacefully?
They throw grenades from between stone throwers" peacefully", use Aks to ambush "peacefully"?
Yeah right, fool someone else.
Our media may be overactive and hyperbolic, but they can take 2 different sides of the issue .
See unlike in
"some countries" we don't assassinate journalists or curb media by force just coz they don't agree with our side of the dialogue, be glad that you are even getting some news from our side of the valley.
What was that now?
Militancy will only get bigger?
Completely distorted analogy, so here's a bitter pill for you to swallow.
5% take part in militancy, while 76% of the rest of the Kashmiris come out to vote and then a democratic non Pakistani state government is chosen.
BS?
You keep saying that, and yet you keep abandoning your pedestal to reply to BS, so much for taking the high road.
In the end, what maybe BS is to you is factual truth to the rest of the world.
