What's new

93,000 Pakistani soldiers did not surrender in 1971 because….?

Status
Not open for further replies.

GlobalVillageSpace

Media Partner
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
993
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
93,000 Pakistani soldiers did not surrender in 1971 because….?
Global Village Space |

Dr. Junaid Ahmad |

December 16, 1971, was an ominous day for Pakistan, because the Pakistani army finally decided to stop their activities to bring law and order to East Pakistan. But the exact numbers of army personnel involved that surrended have been widely exaggerated. It is said that 93,000 Pakistani army personnel surrendered and were later taken by India as Prisoners of War (PoWs).

To this day, this highly exaggerated figure is sustained by Indian, Bangladeshi and defunct Soviet propagandists. Ironically, this propagated number has remained unchallenged and is also widely believed in Pakistan, as few accounts have been written to challenge it.

Actual Facts of the Soldiers on Ground
It is a well known and recognized fact that Pakistan had only one corps comprising three divisions in East Pakistan during 1971. The three divisions comprised a total force of 45,000 including combatant and non-combatant troops. Out of these, there were 34,000 combatant troops and the remaining 11,000 were non-combatant / supporting men and CAF personnel.

This one corp was pitched against three corps of Indian Army from the West and North West and another two corps from the North East and East, a total of five Indian Corps plus 175,000 Indian backed and trained Mukti Bahini and many thousands of Awami League miscreants. When there were only 34,000 fighting troops, how could 93,000 soldiers surrender?

According to Lt Gen Naizi, Corps Commander of Eastern Command in 1971.

The total fighting strength available to me [Gen Naizi] was forty-five thousand – 34,000 from the army, plus 11,000 from CAF and West Pakistan civilian police and armed non-combatants”who were fighting against the insurgents. Even if the strength of HL, MLA, depots, training institutes, workshops, factories, nurses and lady doctors, non-combatants like barbers, cooks, shoemakers and sweepers are added, even then the total comes to only 55,000.

Air Marshal Rahim khan, CNC Pakistan Air Force (1969-1972), has stated

The number of regular Pakistani troops in East Pakistan never exceeded 33,000-34,000. The rest is just propaganda by India and the Awami League, to magnify their success….”

Air Marshal Zulfiqar Ali Khan, who commended Eastern Wing of Pakistan Air Forces has asserted

At the maximum, our regular fighting force in East Pakistan in December 1971 stood at 34,000. This figure does not include paramilitary personnel, military police, etc. Even if you include the auxiliaries, the total does not cross 45,000”.

General Akhtar Abdul Rehman. Former Vice Chief of Army Staff, speaking on the 1971 conundrum stated

It was impossible for the 34,000 Pakistani troops in East Pakistan or for that matter any army in the world to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and 170,000 Mukti Bahini, If not more, that too in a hostile environment 1200 miles away from West Pakistan …… Keeping into account all this, if the Indians still feel that they achieved a stunning military victory against Pakistan, I can only say they have fallen prey to their own propaganda”.

US congressman, Charles Wilson in a discussion with Pakistani diplomats in Washington DC remarked.


Read full article:
93,000 Pakistani soldiers did not surrender in 1971 because….?
 
I have the utmost respect for the 34,000 or so troops that did bravely serve Pakistan in the war. But yes, there were far too many traitors and foreign abettors to overcome. Geography was always an enormous issue as well.

Separation was indeed good for Pakistan in the long run, however. No reason to have a part of the country separated and surrounded by a large adversary. We are in a much better position without it.
 
I have the utmost respect for the 34,000 or so troops that did bravely serve Pakistan in the war. But yes, there were far too many traitors and foreign abettors to overcome. Geography was always an enormous issue as well.

Separation was indeed good for Pakistan in the long run, however. No reason to have a part of the country separated and surrounded by a large adversary. We are in a much better position without it.
We too respect those 93000 who did the right thing by not fighting...

We alway think of the long run,you would have hated us when 71 happened ,thank god now you realise we where doing good for you .
 
Look 34000 or 93000. Fact is they were outnumbered. Outgunned and stabbed in the back and not supported politically. They fought the best they could.
Pakistan was carved out of.India. it was Indian territory. Indian cannot claim victory until every inch of pakistan is India. That my friends will never happen and until such time India will always be a loser.
 
93,000 Pakistani soldiers did not surrender in 1971 because….?
Global Village Space |

Dr. Junaid Ahmad |

December 16, 1971, was an ominous day for Pakistan, because the Pakistani army finally decided to stop their activities to bring law and order to East Pakistan. But the exact numbers of army personnel involved that surrended have been widely exaggerated. It is said that 93,000 Pakistani army personnel surrendered and were later taken by India as Prisoners of War (PoWs).

To this day, this highly exaggerated figure is sustained by Indian, Bangladeshi and defunct Soviet propagandists. Ironically, this propagated number has remained unchallenged and is also widely believed in Pakistan, as few accounts have been written to challenge it.

Actual Facts of the Soldiers on Ground
It is a well known and recognized fact that Pakistan had only one corps comprising three divisions in East Pakistan during 1971. The three divisions comprised a total force of 45,000 including combatant and non-combatant troops. Out of these, there were 34,000 combatant troops and the remaining 11,000 were non-combatant / supporting men and CAF personnel.

This one corp was pitched against three corps of Indian Army from the West and North West and another two corps from the North East and East, a total of five Indian Corps plus 175,000 Indian backed and trained Mukti Bahini and many thousands of Awami League miscreants. When there were only 34,000 fighting troops, how could 93,000 soldiers surrender?

According to Lt Gen Naizi, Corps Commander of Eastern Command in 1971.

The total fighting strength available to me [Gen Naizi] was forty-five thousand – 34,000 from the army, plus 11,000 from CAF and West Pakistan civilian police and armed non-combatants”who were fighting against the insurgents. Even if the strength of HL, MLA, depots, training institutes, workshops, factories, nurses and lady doctors, non-combatants like barbers, cooks, shoemakers and sweepers are added, even then the total comes to only 55,000.

Air Marshal Rahim khan, CNC Pakistan Air Force (1969-1972), has stated

The number of regular Pakistani troops in East Pakistan never exceeded 33,000-34,000. The rest is just propaganda by India and the Awami League, to magnify their success….”

Air Marshal Zulfiqar Ali Khan, who commended Eastern Wing of Pakistan Air Forces has asserted

At the maximum, our regular fighting force in East Pakistan in December 1971 stood at 34,000. This figure does not include paramilitary personnel, military police, etc. Even if you include the auxiliaries, the total does not cross 45,000”.

General Akhtar Abdul Rehman. Former Vice Chief of Army Staff, speaking on the 1971 conundrum stated

It was impossible for the 34,000 Pakistani troops in East Pakistan or for that matter any army in the world to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and 170,000 Mukti Bahini, If not more, that too in a hostile environment 1200 miles away from West Pakistan …… Keeping into account all this, if the Indians still feel that they achieved a stunning military victory against Pakistan, I can only say they have fallen prey to their own propaganda”.

US congressman, Charles Wilson in a discussion with Pakistani diplomats in Washington DC remarked.


Read full article:
93,000 Pakistani soldiers did not surrender in 1971 because….?

please put that question to your own govt.


stamp1.jpg
 
The "actual" facts of the war (1971) are surely way too different than the ones we've been provided with so far. May it be the astonishing figure of the number of soldiers surrendering or the innocents killed in the so-called 'genocide'. History has always been, and is being, ruthlessly used by nations. One can only for the facts to be straightened out.
 
So we attacked India with 90k troops.. Oh wow look how hostiles we were towards India, a big question to 1.2 billions well educated hindus and there mantle capabilities
 
Look 34000 or 93000. Fact is they were outnumbered. Outgunned and stabbed in the back and not supported politically. They fought the best they could.
Pakistan was carved out of.India. it was Indian territory. Indian cannot claim victory until every inch of pakistan is India. That my friends will never happen and until such time India will always be a loser.
We are glad Pakistan is not with India else Musharaf would have been a dictator of combined India. Or may be another Aurangzeb in India or may be India would have been still divided in a few princely states. Thank God for Pakistan, just that the Partition could have been complete had the entire Muslim and Hindu Populations migrated. So we in India are very happy with the status quo. If Pakistan doesnt trouble India in Kashmir like Kargil and support to separatists then India wouldnt need to plan against Pakistan.
We in India dont go after imaginary victories.

So we attacked India with 90k troops.. Oh wow look how hostiles we were towards India, a big question to 1.2 billions well educated hindus and there mantle capabilities
Fair enough but before that would you answer what was Pakistan doing in Kargil with 5000 odd soldiers ??
 
This has been discussed to death in this forum itself. 93000 figure includes Pakistani paramilitary, police, families and civil administration people who surrendered. They were all PoWs, not just soldiers...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom