What's new

Lebonan🇱🇧-Israel🇮🇱 Warr

Reports suggest that a significant number of Yemeni Ansarullah troops, commonly known as the Houthis, have entered Syria with the intention of participating in ground operations against Israel. This development highlights the expanding scope of regional involvement in the ongoing conflict. Ansarullah, a Shia-led militant group from Yemen, has long been aligned with Iran and its axis of resistance, which includes Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Their involvement in ground operations against Israel signals a broader mobilization of allied forces from across the Middle East, potentially escalating tensions further in the region. This move could bring additional complexity to the already volatile situation, drawing in more actors and raising concerns of a wider regional conflict.

1728036910765.jpeg
1728037013191.jpeg
 
Reports suggest that more Israeli troops have been injured following intense clashes with Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. The fighting appears to be intensifying, with Hezbollah exerting significant pressure on Israeli forces in the region. Helicopters have been deployed to evacuate the injured troops, underscoring the severity of the engagements.

This escalation highlights the volatility of the Israel-Lebanon border, where Hezbollah, a powerful militant group backed by Iran, has long posed a formidable challenge to Israeli military operations. As the conflict deepens, there are growing concerns about further regional instability and the potential for a broader confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah.

 
Reports suggest that more Israeli troops have been injured following intense clashes with Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. The fighting appears to be intensifying, with Hezbollah exerting significant pressure on Israeli forces in the region. Helicopters have been deployed to evacuate the injured troops, underscoring the severity of the engagements.

This escalation highlights the volatility of the Israel-Lebanon border, where Hezbollah, a powerful militant group backed by Iran, has long posed a formidable challenge to Israeli military operations. As the conflict deepens, there are growing concerns about further regional instability and the potential for a broader confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah.

helicopters evacuating injured troops are very nice targets for Hezbollah's manpads.
 
Last edited:
Not pan-Islamists. They are Pakistani Shia holding pictures and flags of Iranian/Shia leaders and organizations.

The worldwide community of Islam is far bigger than that and most don't have idolatrous affinity to either Iran or Saudi Arabia.

Those bonded sentences compared to one another.
 
Those bonded sentences compared to one another.
Every religious group has a sense of affinity within it. This does not translate to idolatrous loyalty to countries and religious or political figures (different from affinity actually). Pakistanis display idolatrous loyalty which is weird to me. In Islam, a Khalifa is supposed to be the head of the worldwide Islamic community, their defender and defender of the faith, essentially. A Khalifa does not exist, but if he did, I wouldn't be holding his pictures, he would exist because he has a job to do.
 
Every religious group has a sense of affinity within it. This does not translate to idolatrous loyalty to countries and religious or political figures (different from affinity actually). Pakistanis display idolatrous loyalty which is weird to me. In Islam, a Khalifa is supposed to be the head of the worldwide Islamic community, their defender and defender of the faith, essentially. A Khalifa does not exist, but if he did, I wouldn't be holding his pictures, he would exist because he has a job to do.

Fair enough. But that video I linked is what you described. It's a trait commonly found in South Asian Muslims.
 
Fair enough. But that video I linked is what you described. It's a trait commonly found in South Asian Muslims.
It wasn't like that from the beginning. There was no idolatrous culture, atleast it was not powerful, for over a thousand years of Hindustan led by the original Kshatriya Deva ruling caste at the top. Neither is there evidence of strong idolatrous culture in the previous Indus Valley civilization.

Idolization occurred after Scythians began pouring in from 500 BCE onwards, for a thousand years, who appropriated and changed the original Vedic order and put Brahmin caste at the top. Mahabharat relates to Scythians. Ramayan is in the early Vedic period. Buddh from the original ruling caste (ancient Sharif/Deva) rejected the idolatry and asserted the original order.
 
Better to disband the Lebanon Arab military, sell the weapons, and save their public money for refugees and rebuilding. The military has no purpose, other than perhaps to shoot at Lebanese people. What a disgrace. When it comes to Israel, the state seeks the 'international community', meaning the West, on what to do next. That is basically the gameplan of the moderate (vassal) Arab states.
 
It was a mistake to not to transfer enough air defence equipment to Labennon. Many Hezbollah leaders were attacked by israeli planes freely flying over Beirut. It is about a month for Usa next elections. There is one month left to transfer enough air defences to Iraqi resistance, Yemeni resistance and Hezbollah. I dont mean low altitude manpads but the high altitude ones that can threaten israeli(or usa) aircraft. After elections trump will immediately start attacking Iraqi and Yemeni resistance more aggressively. If air defences are transferred from Iran Usa public will react more harshly to loss of planes and trump cannot start air campaigns easily. If air defences are not transferred until next month there is nothing to complain from Iran as prime responsible to support the resistance(The main responsible for thinking-devising-creating solutions for these types of problems are not the forum users here. the responsibility for this job is Iranian think tanks and other officials before anyone else) after trump starts the air campaign.

How:
Labennon: Air defences can be transferred through Tartus port. Albuqamal pass is easily bombed so only small less detectable equipment can be passed from land from there. Air cargo planes to Syria are intercepted by israel they have more chance if they are escorted by fighter planes. But still it is risky.
Iraq: It is next to Iran and easier to transfer air defence equipment to Iraqi resistance from Iran. Similar to transferring drones and other equipment transfferred to them.
Yemen: Just like how ballistic missiles and current air defenses(scoring many mq9 kills) are transferred.

The same missile system Yemen uses( IIR ground based sensor+ radar-laser rangefinder + large long range anti air missile-rocket) can be transferred. Or similarly the one that I proposed on other threads is also very feasible for shorter ranges still high altitude(IIR ground based sensor + radar-laser rangefinder + small 80kg rocket-missile copied from pantsyr)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom