What's new

60 Most Failed Countries of the World: Postcards From Hell

No! How is ISRAEL a failed state? It produces some really advanced medical and military tech, has a stable economy, good education, health care, a "democratic" government...

Same for Egypt (has a stable economy)

Its not just about economy I guess but over all aspects of stability, govt's control over the land mass and population, military controls, conflicts and future of that country.

I feel there are some mistakes in the report like about Bhutan. I will say its one of the most stable country in the region.

Wiki mentions about the attributes of the index...

"A failed state has several attributes. Common indicators include a state whose central government is so weak or ineffective that it has little practical control over much of its territory; non-provision of public services; widespread corruption and criminality; refugees and involuntary movement of populations; sharp economic decline."

4. Zimbabwe
postcards-from-hell-04.jpg

:hitwall:

Unfortunate.
 
.
what about countries in EU.. :/
one common trend ..most countries are the ones invaded/occupied by outsider
 
. .
Kinetic, but then by that standard a nation that is economically viable, has a democratic government, and good MDG indicators can be labelled a "failed" state because of a period of unrest and instabliity.

If that is the bench mark then would it not apply to countries in the EU like France, Spain, Greece and Ireland?

In my humble opinion, these indicators are made up in a very wishy washy way and ignore the facts on the ground, facts that matter. Like Human Development, Economic Viablity, Governance, rule of law and sustainability.

So in my humble opinion, just like the last "Failed State" report, this one is going in the dustbin.
 
.
No! How is ISRAEL a failed state? It produces some really advanced medical and military tech, has a stable economy, good education, health care, a "democratic" government...

Same for Egypt (has a stable economy)

Same for Philippines - Strong economy, well developed IT sector, in 2008 the country saw a 38% Growth in Philippines IT Sector.

Colombia - Just look at the economic growth and the increase in per capita income from 2008 - to present. Look at the reforms in governance? Increased domestic security..

Pakistan - Well i was expecting Pakistan to be on that list, despite this numerous reports proving Pakistan is anything but a failed state.

There indicators and analysis of what qualifies a "failed" state are just nonsense.

The ranking is done on the basis of 12 indicators:

Social Indicators​

1. Mounting Demographic Pressures

* Pressures deriving from high population density relative to food supply and other life-sustaining resources
* Pressures deriving from group settlement patterns that affect the freedom to participate in common forms of human and physical activity, including economic productivity, travel, social interaction, religious worship
* Pressures deriving from group settlement patterns and physical settings, including border disputes, ownership or occupancy of land, access to transportation outlets, control of religious or historical sites, and proximity to environmental hazards
* Pressures from skewed population distributions, such as a "youth or age bulge," or from divergent rates of population growth among competing communal groups

2. Massive Movement of Refugees or Internally Displaced Persons creating Complex Humanitarian Emergencies

Forced uprooting of large communities as a result of random or targeted violence and/or repression, causing food shortages, disease, lack of clean water, land competition, and turmoil that can spiral into larger humanitarian and security problems, both within and between countries

3. Legacy of Vengeance-Seeking Group Grievance or Group Paranoia

* History of aggrieved communal groups based on recent or past injustices, which could date back centuries
* Patterns of atrocities committed with impunity against communal groups
* Specific groups singled out by state authorities, or by dominant groups, for persecution or repression
* Institutionalized political exclusion
* Public scapegoating of groups believed to have acquired wealth, status or power as evidenced in the emergence of "hate" radio, pamphleteering and stereotypical or nationalistic political rhetoric

Economic Indicators​

5. Uneven Economic Development along Group Lines

* Group-based inequality, or perceived inequality, in education, jobs, and economic status
* Group-based impoverishment as measured by poverty levels, infant mortality rates, education levels
* Rise of communal nationalism based on real or perceived group inequalities

6. Sharp and/or Severe Economic Decline


* A pattern of progressive economic decline of the society as a whole as measured by per capita income, GNP, debt, child mortality rates, poverty levels, business failures, and other economic measures
* Sudden drop in commodity prices, trade revenue, foreign investment or debt payments
* Collapse or devaluation of the national currency
* Extreme social hardship imposed by economic austerity programs
* Growth of hidden economies, including the drug trade, smuggling, and capital flight
* Increase in levels of corruption and illicit transactions among the general populace
* Failure of the state to pay salaries of government employees and armed forces or to meet other financial obligations to its citizens, such as pension payments

Political Indicators


7. Criminalization and/or De legitimization of the State


* Massive and endemic corruption or profiteering by ruling elites
* Resistance of ruling elites to transparency, accountability and political representation
* Widespread loss of popular confidence in state institutions and processes, e.g., widely boycotted or contested elections, mass public demonstrations, sustained civil disobedience, inability of the state to collect taxes, resistance to military conscription, rise of armed insurgencies
* Growth of crime syndicates linked to ruling elites

8. Progressive Deterioration of Public Services

* Disappearance of basic state functions that serve the people, including failure to protect citizens from terrorism and violence and to provide essential services, such as health, education, sanitation, public transportation
* State apparatus narrows to those agencies that serve the ruling elites, such as the security forces, presidential staff, central bank, diplomatic service, customs and collection agencies

9. Suspension or Arbitrary Application of the Rule of Law and Widespread Violation of Human Rights

* Emergence of authoritarian, dictatorial or military rule in which constitutional and democratic institutions and processes are suspended or manipulated
* Outbreak of politically inspired (as opposed to criminal) violence against innocent civilians
* Rising number of political prisoners or dissidents who are denied due process consistent with international norms and practices
* Widespread abuse of legal, political and social rights, including those of individuals, groups or cultural institutions (e.g., harassment of the press, politicization of the judiciary, internal use of military for political ends, public repression of political opponents, religious or cultural persecution)

10. Security Apparatus Operates as a "State Within a State"

* Emergence of elite or praetorian guards that operate with impunity
* Emergence of state-sponsored or state-supported private militias that terrorize political opponents, suspected "enemies," or civilians seen to be sympathetic to the opposition
* Emergence of an "army within an army" that serves the interests of the dominant military or political clique
* Emergence of rival militias, guerilla forces or private armies in an armed struggle or protracted violent campaigns against state security forces

11. Rise of Factionalized Elites

* Fragmentation of ruling elites and state institutions along group lines
* Use of nationalistic political rhetoric by ruling elites, often in terms of communal irredentism, (e.g., a "greater Serbia") or of communal solidarity (e.g., "ethnic cleansing" or "defending the faith")

12. Intervention of Other States or External Political Actors

* Military or Para-military engagement in the internal affairs of the state at risk by outside armies, states, identity groups or entities that affect the internal balance of power or resolution of the conflict
* Intervention by donors, especially if there is a tendency towards over-dependence on foreign aid or peacekeeping missions


Source
 
.
I am sorry and please pardon me for this post. But i don't know why i have a feeling this thread was created just to show Pakistan at Number 10.

Had Pakistan was not there i am sure nobody would bothers to create such a thread mentioning failed states as it should be irrelevant for indian members since their name is not in this list
 
.
^^ if that was the case the counting should have been stopped by 10 itself,but it continued up to 60,why do u people every time feel that anything done by Indian is just to show Pakistan the dust,so far it is evident from the thread itself,even their r Indians who dont consider Pakistan in the failed list
 
.
I am sorry and please pardon me for this post. But i don't know why i have a feeling this thread was created just to show Pakistan at Number 10.

Had Pakistan was not there i am sure nobody would bothers to create such a thread mentioning failed states as it should be irrelevant for indian members since their name is not in this list

lol....zaki..I took all the pain of copying the image src's of 60 different countries,60 different country names,edited them a little bit and posted in the relevant section of the forum for the sake of information to many others,and all u have to say about it is this?????
U disappointed me man..I did not expect this from u......

If my aim was to focus on Pakistan then I could have done that by talking about top 10 only or say,top 20,why go all the way to 60???

It is so because thats the way I found it in the report...

Here is the report

Postcards from Hell
 
. . .
They have included five developing countries, in which 2 of them are nuclear power, sirlanka, Iran, Pakistan, Egypt,Israel. Thats totally BS
 
.
Kinetic, but then by that standard a nation that is economically viable, has a democratic government, and good MDG indicators can be labelled a "failed" state because of a period of unrest and instabliity.

If that is the bench mark then would it not apply to countries in the EU like France, Spain, Greece and Ireland?

In my humble opinion, these indicators are made up in a very wishy washy way and ignore the facts on the ground, facts that matter. Like Human Development, Economic Viablity, Governance, rule of law and sustainability.

So in my humble opinion, just like the last "Failed State" report, this one is going in the dustbin.


France ranks #159

Spain ranks #151

Greece ranks #147

Ireland ranks #173
 
.
lol....zaki..I took all the pain of copying the image src's of 60 different countries,60 different country names,edited them a little bit and posted in the relevant section of the forum for the sake of information to many others,and all u have to say about it is this?????
U disappointed me man..I did not expect this from u......

If my aim was to focus on Pakistan then I could have done that by talking about top 10 only or say,top 20,why go all the way to 60???

It is so because thats the way I found it in the report...

Here is the report

Postcards from Hell

i apologized in advance before making my post :P

that was my own opinion only :)
 
.
India should have been included in top 30 atleast. Few of the states of India have a pathetic condition considering other nations in the list while some states are doing good.



Check list

1. Mounting Demographic Pressures- yes.

2. Massive Movement of Refugees or Internally Displaced Persons creating Complex Humanitarian Emergencies- Yes

3. Legacy of Vengeance-Seeking Group Grievance or Group Paranoia. -Yes


Economic Indicators


5. Uneven Economic Development along Group Lines -Yes

6. Sharp and/or Severe Economic Decline - Nope

Political Indicators

7. Criminalization and/or De legitimization of the State - Yes

8. Progressive Deterioration of Public Services- Nope

9. Suspension or Arbitrary Application of the Rule of Law and Widespread Violation of Human Rights- Nope

10. Security Apparatus Operates as a "State Within a State"- Nope

11. Rise of Factionalized Elites -Nope

12. Intervention of Other States or External Political Actors- Nope


Just my 2 paisa
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom